June 2016 - P2P-Foundation - lists.ourproject.org

Fw: Fw: Info
by Natalie Golovin 10 Mar '26

10 Mar '26

Mark: You and your compatriots on P2P view the world from revisionism. Go ahead and keep looking through your microscope-provided by your "teachers." Or take the time and read some very old documented evidence available at a library near you= but you may need to stay there awhile on microfiche. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Janssen Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 4:39 PM To: P2P Foundation mailing list Subject: Re: [P2P-F] Fw: Info On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Natalie Golovin <10natalie(a)cox.net> wrote: > The European Tribes treated the Natives no worse than they treated each > other. Whoa. You should really stop talking. You have NO idea what you're talking about. How about forced acculturation, not allowing them to speak their own language (which hold the record of their own history), confined them under threat of violent force into reservations, among other things. But, really, that's probably not even the worst of it -- the worst of it is that for reasons they couldn't ever understand is why you were doing all of these cruel things when they were willing to share it it all with you. Why, when they handed out their hand to be friends, you chopped it off. Remember, they're the ones who gave us Thanksgiving which is still "celebrated" in this nation today. Read the reports made of making first contact with the Native peoples here. You really should read up before propagating the attitudes of conquest. Sorry.... marcos _______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

3 4

Uncovering the Labour Coup
by Anna Harris 30 Jun '16

30 Jun '16

Detailed reporting of the names and connections behind the attempt to oust Corbyn! http://www.thecanary.co/2016/06/28/truth-behind-labour-coup-really-began-ma…

1 0

Re: [P2P-F] [NetworkedLabour] A note on the post-capitalist strategy of the P2P Foundation
by Eric Hunting 30 Jun '16

30 Jun '16

One of the interesting effects of advancing technology is a progressive reduction in economies of scale in many industries and systems. Some of the bottleneck technologies you note do have some interesting, if still speculative, alternatives. Railways, for instance. New proposed systems like SkyTran or Hyperloop have significantly lower economies of scale than conventional rail--deliberately so because they find themselves challenged by political conservatives increasingly resistant to 'big ticket' infrastructure investments. There have also been small scale systems overlooked in the conventional urban context, like cable car systems or, one of my favorites, the 'banana monorail' ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_mvBDdWJsM ) which has been experimentally adapted to passenger use in the developing world context. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icXHfnw-gaw ) These have always looked like a lot of fun to me, and could have potential space applications as the supports for the cableway can be designed to be self-supporting and quick-deployable. In Cambodia there was an aid program to encourage rural development through the supply of a kind of simple general purpose modular motor that could be adapted to many uses. One of the ingenious uses devised by locals was a simple rail car that could be used on the long-abandoned traditional rail system. Called the 'bamboo train', these have now become something of a tourist attraction in themselves. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilJAczgfmHk ) Satellites have also started to see hints of competition from new kinds of lower economy of scale systems, sometimes based on very old technology revived with new technology. Satellites have long had a problem of taking so long to deploy--because of their Faberge Egg mode of development--that they have frequently gone obsolete before they could pay for themselves. Sometimes as soon as they have been launched. And so the telecommunications industry has long been interested in alternatives that had some capability for continuous upgrade. Space stations proved too expensive for that, but it has compelled the development of alternatives like stratospheric airships and aircraft relying on solar power. I long corresponded with a developer of these, Michael Walden in Las Vegas. Though more limited in terrestrial footprint, these are so less costly and risky to deploy that using them in larger numbers to make up for the difference in coverage is practical, while offering benefits of much more transmission power, much lower latency, and much more bandwidth thanks to the potentially larger payloads and solar power capacity. Shipping now finds competition, at least in some niches, from revived sailing vessels, such as the Fair Trade Cruisers which now travel to the under-served markets of West Africa and South America. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzBKbWL_Mjs ) With the benefit of new technology, new kinds of sailing vessels based on technologies like rigid solar wingsails, offer potential to make this increasingly viable. I think these things represent a long term trend in the Post-Industrial era. Industrial demassification is driven by the shrinking economies of scale afforded by advancing technology--one of the key factors eroding Industrial Age paradigms from within. On 6/18/16 2:49 PM, p2p-foundation-request(a)lists.ourproject.org wrote: > Subject: > Re: [P2P-F] [NetworkedLabour] A note on the post-capitalist strategy > of the P2P Foundation > From: > Kevin Carson <free.market.anticapitalist(a)gmail.com> > Date: > 6/18/16, 2:49 PM > > CC: > p2p-foundation <p2p-foundation(a)lists.ourproject.org>, > "networkedlabour(a)lists.contrast.org" <networkedlabour(a)lists.contrast.org> > > > The technologies I'm thinking of are the kinds of open-source > micromanufacturing machine tools, smelting furnaces etc. being > developed by groups like Open Source Ecology, and tabletop CNC > machinery being developed by the open hardware community more > generally; open-source machinery like the tractors, compressed earth > block machines, sawmills and so forth also being developed by OSE; > small-scale intensive food production techniques like Permaculture; > and so on. > > I don't question that there are still many bottleneck technologies > that require large scale and capital outlay -- microprocessors > probably the most significant. > > Railroads are another bottleneck industry. > > I don't think electrical power generation is so much -- generating > capability can be pretty well dispersed. And if photovoltaic > generators still require larger, more capital-intensive facilities to > produce, other kinds of renewable power -- wind, or using solar > reflectors as heat source for a steam-powered generator -- are > producible at the local level. I may be wrong -- I'm a layman on > computer hardware issues -- but I think the hosting capability of > server farms can be pretty widely distributed among many small > facilities over a large area. > > But to my mind the most important thing is that the *preponderance* of > small-scale means of production for local consumption means a much > smaller portion of the economy than in the past, and probably a much > smaller portion in the near future than at present, will be critical > bottlenecks subject to capitalist control. > > And the fewer the bottlenecks, and the less time-sensitive they are > (as a result of the increasing availability of expedients like > reprogrammable micro-chips, recycling old hardware for functions where > lower levels of processing capacity are sufficient, increasing > cradle-to-cradle recycling of materials in landfills using local > processing facilities like mini-mills, and less dependance on > long-distance transportation in general thanks to economic > relocalization), the more slack/insulation local economies will have > for riding out periods of impasse before they actually have to be > restocked from the remaining bottlenecks. That means the bottlenecks, > while still remaining, will provide a lot less leverage. > > Not saying there won't be a final phase of violence at the last stage > of the transition as the most critical remaining centralized stuff > changes hands, but it will probably be a lot smaller in scale and with > a vastly shifted correlation of forces -- a mopping-up operation > against capitalist-state forces that have already been strategically > outmaneuvered. -- Eric Hunting erichunting(a)gmail.com

2 1

Fwd: [commoning] The Commons, The State & New Political Movements -> WSF Montreal
by Kevin Flanagan 29 Jun '16

29 Jun '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Silke Helfrich <silke.helfrich(a)gmx.de> Date: 29 June 2016 at 20:55 Subject: [commoning] The Commons, The State & New Political Movements -> WSF Montreal To: COMMONING LIste engl <commoning(a)lists.commons-institut.org> Cc: Tomislav Tomasevic <ttomislav(a)gmail.com>, Heike Loeschmann < Loeschmann(a)boell.de>, Sophie Bloemen <sbloemen(a)bits-of-information.org>, David Hammerstein <hammerstein.david3(a)gmail.com> Dear all, within the "Commons Space" of the next WSF in Montreal (August 9 to August 14); we plan to organize a session on The Commons, the State and New Political Movements! (probably on Thursday, August 11 in the Self-Organized Workshop slot of the WSF) We would love to have this discussion with people who plan to go to Montreal anyway and are concerned with the issue. Therefore, I need your help: Please let me know if you: - participate in the WSF and are interested in the topic - know other ppl. who go and should be part of the discussion (from Greece, Spain, Brasil, Croatia, France, the USA, Bolivia etc, etc?) - have in mind ppl. you would love to involve in this discussion and who need to be part if it but don't plan to go to Montreal, let me know anyway for some further coordination (Name dropping is ok, I can do some further research, an e-mail contact would be fine however) For more commons related activities at the WSF, you might consider to subscribe at: https://lists.p2pfoundation.net/wws/info/wsf2016 (there is also a hackpad we are using for some basic coordination, you might have seen it on this list.) Thanks a lot in advance, Warm greetings Silke SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE SESSION: 6. The Commons, the State and New Political Movements (Commons Strategies Group) The Market/State is in crisis, and the Commons offers a way to go beyond both Market and State. So can the Commons help us move beyond the current crisis? Does this moment represent a window of opportunity to widen the space for commoning -- or will the deep structural crisis of neoliberalism simply accelerate enclosures, hyper-nationalism and repression as it struggles to retain its hegemony? If we understand the state as a complex institutional system that solidifies power relationships in society, the question for our time is whether commoners are capable of re-imagining state power to shift legality, resources and support for the commons. We need to assess the achievements and limitations of the many system-change movements to date. What lessons can we learn from the Occupy movement worldwide, "Nuit debout" in France, M15/Podemos in Spain, the Bolivian social movements that spurred political change years ago, Brasilian movements, the climate justice movement and, more recently, the surprising success of the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign? Each of these movements have shown that change comes from the edges and from below, not from within the system. But it remains an open question how transformative and "commonistic" these movements have been or could be. How do they frame their work, strategies and slogans? What role do they play in the fight for the commons and what role does the commons as a discourse and paradigm play for them? This topic is fairly unexplored. Therefore, we suggest an open space for discussion with 4-5 inputs, 5 minutes each and a moderated discussion (evt. fishbowl) Organizers: Silke Helfrich, Commons Strategies Group Elizabetta Cangelosi (transform, Coordinator, Logistics) Participants: from, Mexico, Bolivia, Spain, Europe, USA, Greece -- Silke Helfrich www.commonsblog.de _______________________________________________ Commoning mailing list Commons-Institut e.V. Germany Commoning(a)lists.commons-institut.org https://lists.schokokeks.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/commoning -- https://twitter.com/flgnk Skype: kev.flanagan Phone: +353 87 743 5660

1 0

Re: [P2P-F] New article from Michel Bauwens
by Eric Hunting 29 Jun '16

29 Jun '16

Please feel free. I have no blog of my own at the moment. On 6/18/16 8:42 PM, p2p-foundation-request(a)lists.ourproject.org wrote: > Subject: > Re: [P2P-F] New article from Michel Bauwens > From: > Kevin Carson <free.market.anticapitalist(a)gmail.com> > Date: > 6/18/16, 7:01 PM > > To: > P2P Foundation mailing list <p2p-foundation(a)lists.ourproject.org> > > > This would make an AMAZING standalone blog post, Eric (with a few > added paragraph divisions). If you don't publish it anywhere else, can > I use it for C4SS? -- Eric Hunting erichunting(a)gmail.com

2 1

Fwd: [commoning] Connected Action for the Commons!
by Kevin Flanagan 26 Jun '16

26 Jun '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Silke Helfrich <silke.helfrich(a)gmx.de> Date: 26 June 2016 at 20:58 Subject: [commoning] Connected Action for the Commons! To: COMMONING LIste engl <commoning(a)lists.commons-institut.org>, Kommening Liste <kommening(a)lists.commons-institut.org> FYI Featured, on 22 June, 2016. *Connected Action for the Commons! * The call for ECF’s third Idea Camp was launched last month. Titled Moving Communities <http://goteo.org/mail/link/14712564> it will focus on the current positive, radical resistance movements that are daring to counteract anti-democratic practices. A total of 50 disruptivel and transformative ideas will be selected to participate in co-creation workshops and encourage their growth. Of these, 25 will be eligible for an R&D grant of €10,000 for one year. The event will be held in Spain and our team is responsible for its production. Download the bases here and start preparing your idea. www.goteo.org <//goteo.org> SUPPORT OUR MISSION <https://fundacion.goteo.org/donaciones/> Descubre proyectos <//goteo.org/discover> Crea un proyecto <//goteo.org/project/create> Síguenos -- Silke Helfrich www.commonsblog.de _______________________________________________ Commoning mailing list Commons-Institut e.V. Germany Commoning(a)lists.commons-institut.org https://lists.schokokeks.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/commoning -- https://twitter.com/flgnk Skype: kev.flanagan Phone: +353 87 743 5660

1 0

Fwd: Fw: TECHNOCALYPS back in the cinemas
by Michel Bauwens 25 Jun '16

25 Jun '16

last day indeed <g> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Frank Theys <votnik(a)yahoo.com> Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:15 AM Subject: Fw: TECHNOCALYPS back in the cinemas To: Last show this Sunday 26th of June at the Galeries Cinema in Brussels, Galerie de la Reine 26, 1000 Brussels [image: technocalyps announcement cinéma galeries.jpg] -- Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/

1 0

Fwd: Introducing the how, why and what of the Decentralized Society Research Project
by Michel Bauwens 25 Jun '16

25 Jun '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mathijs de Bruin <mathijs(a)dsrp.eu> Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:08 PM Subject: Introducing the how, why and what of the Decentralized Society Research Project To: Dear all, Last thursday I had the honour to give a first presentation on the preliminary results of the Decentralized Society Research Project. In this 20-minute talk I explain the overall why, how and what and will touch upon some of the practicalities of moving forward. The video and the slides are available on: http://dsrp.eu/post/146300647328/dsrp-intro Please do not refrain from sharing your thoughts, reflections and comments. I might not respond individually but would love to compile a FAQ or initiate some structured form of discussion. During my talk I have referred several times to the preceding talk, no less interesting than mine, introducing Zeitgeist’s idea of a Resource Based Economy, by Serf Doesborgh. I hope to be able to share the video of his talk with you soon. Meanwhile, you might want to look for the Zeitgeist Adde Both talks were part of the Ons Systeem meetup, a gathering of incorrigible progressive thinkers on culture, sustainability, economy and social innovation. Meetups are held every third Thursday of the month in Utrecht (NL). https://www.facebook.com/OnsSysteem.elke.3eDonderdag/ With warm regards, Mathijs P.S. Should you be interested in personally discussing views relating to these matters, I will likely be available in The Netherlands for the upcoming months. Likewise, I would be delighted to perform this talk at your convenience in order to further and refine some of the ideas presented. — Decentralized Society Research Project http://dsrp.eu / http://dsrp.eu/hackpad mathijs(a)dsrp.eu +31 6 44 838 131 -- Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/

1 0

Fwd: The War on Weed Is Winding Down, But Will Monsanto/Bayer Be the Winner?
by Anna Harris 25 Jun '16

25 Jun '16

> From: Ellen Brown <Ellen.Brown(a)PublicBankingInstitute.org> > Date: 25 June 2016 at 18:02:55 BST > To: <anna(a)shsh.co.uk> > Subject: The War on Weed Is Winding Down, But Will Monsanto/Bayer Be the Winner? > Reply-To: Ellen Brown <Ellen.Brown(a)PublicBankingInstitute.org> > > Hi, here is my latest article, posted on Global Research -- > The War on Weed Is Winding Down, > But Will Monsanto/Bayer Be the Winner? > > Best wishes, > Ellen > http://EllenBrown.com > http://PublicBankingInstitute.org > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe anna(a)shsh.co.uk from this list. > > Update your profile >

1 0

Fwd: [NetworkedLabour] Call for Papers: State of Power 2017
by Michel Bauwens 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nick Buxton <nick(a)tni.org> Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:34 PM Subject: [NetworkedLabour] Call for Papers: State of Power 2017 To: networkedlabour(a)lists.contrast.org Hi folks, This list has always been a great place for some thinking around these issues. Welcome any contributions! Nick Call for Papers: State of Power 2017 <https://www.tni.org/en/article/call-for-papers-state-of-power-2017> *The Transnational Institute (TNI) in the Netherlands is issuing an open call for essays/short papers for its forthcoming State of Power report launched in late January 2017 to coincide with the World Economic Forum in Davos. In 2017, we are particularly looking for accessible, engaging essays that interrogate the relations** between culture and power.* TNI’s annual State of Power reports have, since their launch in 2012, become a must-see reference point for citizens, activists and academics concerned with understanding the nature of power in our globalised world in order to inform struggles for justice. With a mixture of compelling infographics and insightful essays, State of Power has examined dimensions of power (economic, political, social), exposed the key players who control power, and highlighted movements of counter-power seeking to transform our world. Power and Culture There is growing public awareness of the concentration of economic power in the world, and TNI has in previous reports exposed the legal, political and international processes that have facilitated this power grab. However, power only becomes hegemonic when it is reinforced continuously through cultural processes that make the exercise of power seem ‘natural’ and irreversible. This is the process that has converted neoliberalism into an accepted fact of everyday life, rather than an ideology that has been designed to benefit certain interests. Cultural hegemony has also sustained powerful structures from the military through to the banking sector. At the same time, culture is a key arena for struggles and has provided dynamism and force to the most effective social movements; and one could argue is the most important area for work if we are to really embed and sustain transformative practices in our communities and states over the long-term. Most of all, at a time when the world seem beset by multiple crises and the disturbing rise of reactionary forces, it seems apt to remember what Antonio Gramsci once wrote: “The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new is yet to be born. And in the interregnum, a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.” How ultimately can social movements assert their own power through cultural forms to reject the dangerous symptoms of morbidity and bring the new into being? Here are a number of important and diverse questions that we would like to interrogate: - What are the cultural roots that have bolstered neoliberalism or more generally capitalism? - What have been the main cultural mechanisms for embedding and reinforcing power structures in politics, institutions and everyday life? - How do cultural norms reinforce unjust power relations in different spheres of life – schools/universities, parliaments, governments, corporations, the military? What shape is this likely to take in the future? - What role does the media play in reinforcing structural power and cultural hegemony? How has growing concentration and consolidation of the media industry played a role? What examples are there where media has played an important role in confronting entrenched power? What can we learn from this? - What role have thinktanks, policy experts, academia and civil society played in reinforcing political and economic concentrations of power? Conversely what role have some institutes and researchers played in confronting unjust power structures? - What role has the technology industry played in reinforcing power or confronting power? How has the concentrated power in the ‘Silicon Valleys’ of the world used cultural exchange and shaped culture to further increase their power – and the power of other elites? - What examples are there where cultural norms that bolster entrenched power have been successfully challenged? - How have cultural memes been used successfully to build counter-power or to embed new transformative practices? - How have corporations used culture and the arts to bolster their power? And how have activists successfully countered this power through cultural expression? - What cultural shifts do we need to imagine and construct just alternatives? How we build a culture that reinforces values of the commons, solidarity, and harmony with nature? This is not an exclusive list. We welcome a wide range of perspectives and analysis on the broad theme, however TNI does appreciate essays that relate to areas we most closely work on such as corporate impunity, trade and investment policies, land and agrarian issues, resource grabbing, public services, security and civil liberties, social movements and counter-power (see https://www.tni.org/en/projects) To encourage submissions from activists on low-incomes and people from the Global South , we also have a small number of grants of 600 euros for selected essays from individuals that fit this category. Please indicate with evidence in your submissions whether you would like to apply for this grant. The money will only be distributed if your essay is chosen for the main report. For an idea of the kind of essays we are interested in, please read the essays featured in State of Power 2016: <http://www.tni.org/stateofpower2016>http://www.tni.org/stateofpower2016 Style TNI is a research and advocacy organisation but not an academic institution, and seeks to provide accessible analysis that can be read and used by a broad range of activists and social movements. We are therefore looking for analysis that is not over-theoretical and written in a style that is accessible. We are interested in new and insightful analysis, and also encourage the use of: - stories - concrete examples - metaphors - journalistic techniques We discourage the overuse of academic jargon literature analysis and academic debates that mean little to the public. In our experience the more accessible the material, the more widely it is used and shared. Process The final report will be made up of a mixture of essays from this open call and a number of pre-commissioned essays. We have designed a process to feature what we consider the best essays in the main report. The decision on which papers are featured will be decided by an Editorial Panel made up of the Director, the editor of the report and the Communications Manager. The selection process will follow three stages: 1. In the first stage, researchers will be asked to provide abstracts, a short bio and some links to previous work. It will help your application if your previous work is not just limited to academic texts but includes some more accessible journalistic pieces. Abstracts can be based on existing papers or be provisional ideas of what you hope to explore. If you would like to apply for the grant – available to low-income participants – please indicate this at this stage. 2. Those whose abstracts are chosen will be asked to submit an essay. The top four or five essays will be selected for the report by the Editorial Panel. 3. The selected essays will go through a final round of revisions based on feedback by the Editorial Panel, and subject to final copyedit. We hope to feature one essay as an infographic. 4. Essays that do not make the top eight – and are considered good essays by the Editorial Panel - will be available as downloadable PDFs linked from the main report. *Remuneration unfortunately won’t be available though for these essays that don’t appear in the main report. * *Instructions for submission* Abstracts must be emailed to <stateofpower(a)tni.org>stateofpower(a)tni.org by 16 September 2016. Final essays will be due on 4 November 2016. - Abstracts/essays must address the issue of power from a critical perspective, seeking to provide useful knowledge and analysis for movements engaged in the struggle for social and environmental justice - Abstracts/essays can be based on reworked versions of existing or previously published essays/papers but must be made accessible to a non-academic audience - TNI particularly welcomes submissions by young scholars and people based in the Global South. - Abstracts and essays can be written in English or Spanish. - Abstracts must be a maximum of 1000 words. They do not need to be of continuous prose but must capture the main arguments of the essay and can be expanded outlines. Bios should be 200 words. - Essay length: 5000 words. Shorter essays are acceptable, but not longer than 5000 words. - *Style: TNI has five basic criteria for its research and publications that will also be used to assess the abstracts and essays:* - Credible: Well researched and evidence-based - Accessible: Readable by a broad non-specialist audience (in other words please avoid too much academic jargon) and try to use stories, examples - Additional: Adds depth, new insights or detail to existing knowledge/research - Radical: Tackles the structural roots of critical issues - Propositional: Does not just critique, but also where relevant puts forward just alternatives - Please include an abstract at the top of the paper (maximum 500 words) and add a short bio (150 words) - Do not include references in brackets within the text. Instead provide a bibliography at end of essay and/or provide endnotes for references, preferably in Chicago style. Please do not overdo it on the endnotes (no more than 40 for each essay)– use it mainly for referring to facts/evidence that may be surprising, questioned or challenged. - *Please send as .doc file or .docx file* - *The decision of the Editorial Panel is final. If your abstract or essay is chosen for the book, please be ready to respond to peer reviews and copyediting comments based on the timeline below.* *Timeline* June Call for abstracts/papers 16 September Deadline for submission of abstracts 22 September Notification of chosen abstracts for final essays 4 November Submission of essays 11 November Notification of chosen essays and suggested comments for final draft 25 November Final version submitted by author 9 December Copyedits sent to author for final check/revision 19 January Launch -- ----------------------------------------------------- NICK BUXTON Communications m: +1 530 902 3772 e: nick(a)tni.org twitter: @nickbuxton skype: nickbuxton w: www.tni.org ----------------------------------------------------- Read my latest book, The Secure and the Dispossessed (November 2015)www.climatesecurityagenda.org CONNECT WITH TNI - Sign up to TNI's e-newsletters: http://www.tni.org/subscribe - TNI on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TransnationalInstitute - TNI on twitter: https://twitter.com/TNInstitute _______________________________________________ NetworkedLabour mailing list NetworkedLabour(a)lists.contrast.org http://lists.contrast.org/mailman/listinfo/networkedlabour -- Check out the Commons Transition Plan here at: http://commonstransition.org P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/

1 0