September 2022 - P2P-Foundation - lists.ourproject.org

Fw: Fw: Info
by Natalie Golovin 10 Mar '26

10 Mar '26

Mark: You and your compatriots on P2P view the world from revisionism. Go ahead and keep looking through your microscope-provided by your "teachers." Or take the time and read some very old documented evidence available at a library near you= but you may need to stay there awhile on microfiche. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Janssen Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 4:39 PM To: P2P Foundation mailing list Subject: Re: [P2P-F] Fw: Info On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Natalie Golovin <10natalie(a)cox.net> wrote: > The European Tribes treated the Natives no worse than they treated each > other. Whoa. You should really stop talking. You have NO idea what you're talking about. How about forced acculturation, not allowing them to speak their own language (which hold the record of their own history), confined them under threat of violent force into reservations, among other things. But, really, that's probably not even the worst of it -- the worst of it is that for reasons they couldn't ever understand is why you were doing all of these cruel things when they were willing to share it it all with you. Why, when they handed out their hand to be friends, you chopped it off. Remember, they're the ones who gave us Thanksgiving which is still "celebrated" in this nation today. Read the reports made of making first contact with the Native peoples here. You really should read up before propagating the attitudes of conquest. Sorry.... marcos _______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

3 4

New book: Digital Humanism: A Philosophy for 21st Century Digital Society (Christian Fuchs)
by Christian Fuchs 21 Sep '22

21 Sep '22

Fuchs, Christian. 2022. Digital Humanism. A Philosophy for 21st Century Digital Society. SocietyNow Series. Bingley: Emerald. More information and sample reading: https://fuchsc.uti.at/books/digital-humanism/ Our contemporary global digital society is not always a good place to live. Authoritarianism, hatred, false news, post-truth culture, the COVID-19 anti-vaccination movement, COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and political polarisation are organised via the Internet. The public sphere is highly polarised. Today, many humans tend to think of other humans mainly in terms of friends and enemies. Robots and Artificial Intelligence-based automation have created new challenges for the world of work. Decades of neoliberalism have increased inequalities. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the vulnerability of humanity to viruses and health crises. Humanity and society are in a major crisis and digitalisation mediates this crisis. /Digital Humanism/ explores how Humanism can help us to critically understand how digital technologies shape society and humanity, providing an introduction to Humanism in the digital age. Fuchs introduces the approach of Digital Humanism and outlines foundations of a Radical Digital Humanism, analysing what decolonisation of academia and the study of the digital, media and communication means; what the roles are of robots, automation, and Artificial Intelligence in digital capitalism, and how the communication of death and dying has been mediated by digital technologies, capitalist necropower, and digital capitalism. In order to save humanity and society, we need Radical Digital Humanism now. “Digital Humanism is the book we have been waiting for. … Digital Humanism refuses to transform humans into machines and to think of machines as humans. This is why this book is such an important and timely intervention" Eva Illouz, Director of Studies at EHESS, Paris/ //Table of Contents /Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. What is Humanism? Chapter 3. What is Digital Humanism? Chapter 4. Decolonising Academia: A Radical Humanist Perspective Chapter 5. Robots and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Digital Capitalism Chapter 6. Policy Discourses on Robots and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the EU, the USA, and China Chapter 7. Necropower, Death, and Digital Communication in Covid-19 Capitalism Chapter 8. Conclusion

1 0

Fwd: Ending Discrimination Through Unity: The 2022 Counterweight Conference
by Michel Bauwens 18 Sep '22

18 Sep '22

very important conference about the frontiers about the re-emerging inclusionary anti-racism: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Steven J. Lawrence from Ground Experience < groundexperience(a)substack.com> Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 7:16 AM Subject: Ending Discrimination Through Unity: The 2022 Counterweight Conference To: <michelsub2004(a)gmail.com> The Counterweight Conference's contribution to the depolarization movement and my role as conference speaker, recruiter, advisor, and academic affiliate ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ Open in browser <https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=266471&post_id=73773475&u…> Ending Discrimination Through Unity: The 2022 Counterweight Conference <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…>The Counterweight Conference's contribution to the depolarization movement and my role as conference speaker, recruiter, advisor, and academic affiliate <https://substack.com/redirect/bbdccbd1-392d-466d-856d-ee462e00e9b0?r=3zjg0> Steven J. Lawrence <https://substack.com/redirect/bbdccbd1-392d-466d-856d-ee462e00e9b0?r=3zjg0> Sep 18 <https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=266471&post_id=73773475&u…> <https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=266471&post_id=73773475&u…> <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> ▷ Listen <https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=266471&post_id=73773475&u…> SAVE <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> On Saturday, September 24 at 10am, Eastern Standard Time, a recording of a talk I gave will be broadcast live during the third day of the Counterweight Conference for Liberal Approaches to Diversity and Inclusion <https://substack.com/redirect/671dc066-5e5b-4354-8553-c7e690f93180?r=3zjg0> followed by a live Q&A with me and the audience. My talk is titled, “Shaping a Workplace Culture: The Fundamentals,” and explores one of the most fundamental attributes of all in a leader who wishes to be authentically influential: the need to acknowledge when they are wrong. To sign up for my specific talk, please click here <https://substack.com/redirect/bc660815-a59a-47f2-b92c-6cf62e0e2139?r=3zjg0>*. <https://substack.com/redirect/bc660815-a59a-47f2-b92c-6cf62e0e2139?r=3zjg0>* All talks are free for everyone during the conference and for 24 hours after the conference. There are other options for those who wish to access the talks after the conference has ended. The conference links I’ve provided above will let people know what the options are and how to proceed. Ground Experience is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> <https://substack.com/redirect/2eca67bc-8a3e-4d82-adad-8f884c1e534b?r=3zjg0> *Why was I invited to give a talk at the conference?* I’ve known the founder of Counterweight, Helen Pluckrose <https://substack.com/redirect/8f2c1f45-e94e-4a77-bd24-38c233ee3d16?r=3zjg0>, for about seven years now. I was an early supporter of her scholarship and her advocacy for freedom of speech, conscience, thought, and expression from the beginning and especially of her moral courage and unwavering commitment to liberal humanism and the importance of what she calls “evidence-based epistemology <https://substack.com/redirect/58ab65c4-525a-4189-889c-d95a9cd5d341?r=3zjg0>”. As I mentioned in the introduction to “Beyond Cynicism” <https://substack.com/redirect/6bba7af5-a5f4-4c93-8407-525c52c45d8f?r=3zjg0>, Helen Pluckrose asked me to join Counterweight at the beginning of its founding as one of its Academic Affiliates <https://substack.com/redirect/b96a82c8-1731-4dbe-aa9a-56e08c6498fa?r=3zjg0>, alongside others she had asked to join, including Iona Italia <https://substack.com/redirect/de198318-1e33-4e2e-bc11-d1043a077db8?r=3zjg0>, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Steven Pinker, Ayaan Hirsi Ali <https://substack.com/redirect/16de3967-d672-43b4-b33c-093045076c85?r=3zjg0>, Erec Smith <https://substack.com/redirect/d1d73b4b-498a-458d-8f65-141c929072b8?r=3zjg0>, Eric Kaufmann, Jonathan Church, Lee Jussim <https://substack.com/redirect/94b959d6-8053-4b8b-b15e-b0988958cae6?r=3zjg0>, Ayishat Akanb <https://substack.com/redirect/972b658d-2ed2-4c1b-bf16-a93cebaff7e8?r=3zjg0>i, Thomas Chatterton Williams <https://substack.com/redirect/996be673-be02-4493-a5fb-0d3656abc204?r=3zjg0>, John McWhorter <https://substack.com/redirect/f7cec234-3801-4b57-8e27-e6eba7761fce?r=3zjg0>, Glenn Loury <https://substack.com/redirect/58c55e6f-8649-4c36-874d-c9a2e4705234?r=3zjg0>, Peter Boghossian, Jennifer Friend <https://substack.com/redirect/f5a84a38-43bd-436e-b9f5-4db696f8ce67?r=3zjg0>, and several others. As an Academic Affiliate, during the first year, I was handed a small caseload in which I advised people who came to Counterweight looking for advice on how to handle difficult situations in their workplaces or communities after extreme identity-based ideologies were formally installed throughout their organizations causing division and open hostility. Throughout this work, my advice has mostly involved providing information about the ideologies themselves and helping the “client” find the right wording to advocate for symmetrical conversations in their workplaces where people can learn to “speaking across” so that they don’t feel they have to “speak out”. But this was hard work, and the organization was getting a lot of distressing messages from people across the English-speaking world, so some of Counterweight’s staff had to take a step back and figure out how to proceed in a universe that was fast becoming ideologically entrenched with almost no end in sight. Helen herself advised me on a Zoom call in the winter of 2021 to step back from my own advocacy for more humane approaches to inclusion in the workplace, saying “I’m afraid, Steven, that America is lost for now.” And she was right. If the detailed description of some of the beliefs and practices laid out in Erec Smith’s Free Black Thought’s Substack piece Six Unsettling Features of DEI in K-12 <https://substack.com/redirect/a5621f67-3bf6-4c44-aa0d-b07f92e9efc9?r=3zjg0> doesn’t offer a chilling enough glimpse into where we are finding ourselves in the current cultural zeitgeist, then hopefully we might be persuaded by the writings of Frances Lee, a self-identified transgender nonbinary Asian “intersectional activist” and cultural studies doctoral candidate, who describes the atmosphere of fear and worry that has emerged in recent years in activist spaces (and activist workplaces) that focus on diversity and inclusion in dehumanizing ways. In “No Justice Without Love: Why Activism Must Be More Generous” <https://substack.com/redirect/d885e184-b62d-45bf-9e27-c826dfea8b86?r=3zjg0>, they write: “After publishing an essay <https://substack.com/redirect/453fa6cd-1e95-4d6d-8546-a5b8ac9f578e?r=3zjg0> in YES! Magazine about this anxiety I received countless letters from readers around the world expressing similar stories. Many of them identified as *former* activists and leftists, having been pushed out of activist spaces for ‘not being radical enough’ or ‘being too privileged.’ Some readers relayed that they wept with relief to read that they weren’t the only ones feeling utterly ostracized… Readers who identified as having privilege expressed feeling turned off by the ways they had to perform unquestioning allyship to marginalized people and respond to the guilt by shrinking themselves into nothingness.” This is something I witnessed as a caseworker for Counterweight and also as a member of a private Heterodox Academy email group for “cancelled'“ professors who have made the smallest of errors that only ran afoul not of any objectively moral code, but of an extreme ideology’s most recently designed orthodoxy. Some of these professors are quite well-known, and more than a few of their cases are in court, with some having settled financially with their institutions for some pretty outrageous acts in the name of high ideals. I have been writing about this topic for a few years now in various places, and most recently on the Ground Experience Substack page in the “All We Are” <https://substack.com/redirect/6bba7af5-a5f4-4c93-8407-525c52c45d8f?r=3zjg0> series of essays. In many ways, what has been emerging in these movements runs counter to the principles I’ve outlined in my website, Support Your Mission <https://substack.com/redirect/075621d5-3482-4062-81df-8ef104fde5ea?r=3zjg0>, which explores what I call the Three Supports for Community and Organizational Development <https://substack.com/redirect/a0e4de99-5707-49e1-ba41-cbfcf46db8d9?r=3zjg0>, which includes building agency <https://substack.com/redirect/fc9ead16-d413-41a0-903f-9dc9acfaac1f?r=3zjg0> in those closest to the action, designing a mission-based environment <https://substack.com/redirect/d3d26f17-c439-4f87-ab58-ab07bbc680e0?r=3zjg0>, and nurturing a culture of inquiry and open exchange <https://substack.com/redirect/ac8eadca-c1de-4168-a9ee-deea6a1e0125?r=3zjg0>. The great majority of DEI trainings today foster a more authoritarian approach which emphasizes ideological conformity and close-minded opposition to all questioning. For a more immersive experience of how these types of atmospheres can manifest in an organization and why it is absolutely crucial for us to find alternative approaches to diversity and inclusion that are more compassionate and empirically based (rather than ideologically based), I highly recommend Benjamin A. Boyce’s documentary series on the 2017 meltdown of Evergreen State College. <https://substack.com/redirect/d885e184-b62d-45bf-9e27-c826dfea8b86?r=3zjg0>*Counterweight Shifts to Depolarization as Central Mission* Fortunately, many of us are learning to adjust to the times and are continuing to evolve in our perspectives and in advocacy. After nurturing the mission for two years and desiring a break from public life, Pluckrose stepped down from Counterweight in 2021, and handed the reigns to a new team of energetic social entrepreneurs <https://substack.com/redirect/30bc2a25-bdb6-43ff-8f2a-ba331d81ae91?r=3zjg0>, Laura Walker-Beaven, Jennifer Friend, and Harriet Terrill. Since this transition, the organization’s mission <https://substack.com/redirect/45084327-5747-4b00-ba99-928acc2c20af?r=3zjg0> has evolved even further, and Counterweight’s main focus now is to discover and promote ways to reduce the political polarization that has been growing in our society, including our political parties, social media spaces, workplaces, and local communities. In the mission statement, Counterweight identifies “political polarization” as “the meta-problem” we must all work collectively to resolve—a mission similar to Braver Angels <https://substack.com/redirect/f314cd3b-598a-48cb-b85b-72c2bf499215?r=3zjg0>, the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism <https://substack.com/redirect/566b6759-12c0-42da-a9e2-80c081681d8d?r=3zjg0> (F.A.I.R.), the Protopia Lab <https://substack.com/redirect/6386aafc-d62c-40d9-879e-7989a8cb92c1?r=3zjg0>, and others. “Division between different political and ideological factions is making it almost impossible for us to agree not only on the solutions to these problems but on the nature of the problems themselves. In fact, it has even become difficult for us to agree on the nature of reality. This is why at Counterweight, we believe political polarisation is the meta-problem we must resolve so we can protect liberal democracy and ensure we have the capability to address all of the other threats we face.” Although I don’t explicitly address political polarization in my talk at the Counterweight Conference, I do talk about an important “fundamental” that I believe can contribute to depolarization on any scale: humility and “the willingness to be wrong” in front of others. In the talk, I made the choice to speak plainly in a less academic way, noting that I wanted to leave the more complex ideas and higher-level conceptualizing to the other presenters, as many of their ideas are a direct influence on my own, and I wanted them to speak for themselves. In fact two of the presenters I personally recruited for the conference have had a direct influence on my own thinking around racial depolarization: George Yancey and Christine Louis Dit Sully. This summer, I had just read both of their recent books, Yancey’s “Beyond Racial Division” <https://substack.com/redirect/989ac01a-8dd4-4f6d-99f6-2b08075cfa62?r=3zjg0> and Dit Sully’s “Transcending Racial Divisions” <https://substack.com/redirect/bcdf9bb3-7720-4d36-b09d-7002132bcf2d?r=3zjg0>. I found both of their books very useful for different reasons. Yancey’s book offers a much-needed “middle path” that doesn’t reject the very real challenges faced by people of color in Western societies (which Yancey calls the colorblind approach) or over-indulge in hatred, hostility, and identity-based separateness (which is deftly called ideological antiracism). And Dit Sully’s book offers a well-researched intricate journey into the history of racialism, race theories and their damaging impact on societies in the past and present. In fact, I was so inspired by these writings that I recruited both of them to present at the Counterweight Conference. To my great delight, the conferences organizers accepted their late entries into the conference lineup, and at the time of this writing they both informed me that they have completed the recording of their talks. <https://substack.com/redirect/6e19de45-853e-4f6e-b2cf-7e359f8c78dd?r=3zjg0> *How the Depolarization Movement Is Influencing My Work at a Minority Serving Institution* The writings of George Yancey, Christine Louis Dit Sully, and the writings of others at the conference, including Erec Smith, Angel Eduardo, Ian Rowe, Roland Fryer, Greg Thomas have provided much-needed inspiration for me in my work at a college that serves mostly underserved populations. As the chair of the Faculty Development Committee at the Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology <https://substack.com/redirect/04edb3f6-5129-4e82-b50e-fd9b6519db6f?r=3zjg0>, I’ve been charged with the responsibility to help organize trainings around diversity and inclusion, and workshops around teaching strategies that can increase access to learning for students with disabilities. Additionally, I have been working with a specialist in trauma on a series of workshops on the creation of trauma-informed environments. So, inclusion and empathy for human beings is on the very top of my list of priorities in my professional life. Thus, a conference like this one could not have been better timed. It’s quite fascinating to be teaching and leading committees at a college that was founded by Benjamin Franklin. Franklin, one of the most famous Founding Fathers and one of only six people who signed both the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution bequeathed a sizable sum of his inheritance to the City of Boston to create a technology institute for working tradesmen. With matching funds from Andrew Carnegie and the implementation of a sophisticated investment scheme that Franklin imposed upon the endowment, the Benjamin Franklin Institute of Technology was founded in 1908. It’s important to acknowledge that at the time he created this endowment, Franklin stipulated that it was white workers who would be the beneficiaries of his estate. And now, nearly a century and a quarter after its founding, this very same institute is not only led by the first Black woman president in its history <https://substack.com/redirect/f9522c4e-1eb8-463f-9e08-9a75ed24e5f3?r=3zjg0> but serves more than 74 per cent students of color—and is officially designated by the U.S. Office of Civil Rights as a Minority Serving Institution (MSI) <https://substack.com/redirect/395758c7-d527-4a32-be2d-6b0829f2a123?r=3zjg0> . In a sense, we have an opportunity at the college to honor both the traditionally celebrated way-showers from our country’s history (in this case the legacy of Benjamin Franklin, a person of European-American origin) and to forge a path forward <https://substack.com/redirect/ff7ab850-a44f-4f8a-a050-e49a4ece2584?r=3zjg0> for Black and brown workers and industry pioneers in the multiple and greatly-diversifying fields of technology that Franklin himself could not have dreamed of. Thus, we have an opportunity at the college to honor both past and future legacies by experimenting with high-resolution, productive, fair, and even healing approaches to increasing the diversity of the workforce and building an inclusive environment on the scale of the college, the city it serves, and even entire fields of technology. And that’s what the Counterweight Conference was created for. *Details About the Counterweight Conference* The conference is an international virtual gathering of educators, scholars, thought leaders, public policy advocates, social workers, and human rights activists who are working to forge a new, more productive path for building a fair and inclusive society, which includes pathways for building fair and inclusive workplaces. In the press release announcing the event, the organizers of the conference describe the surrounding circumstances that have made such a conference necessary: “In the past few years, companies and employees have felt increasing pressure to engage with D&I initiative. Some programmes offer useful insights into how we can create more inclusive workplaces. Too often, though, the ways in which people approach D&I come from ideological foundations that are divisive and sectarian in nature. In addition to this, companies continue to spend large sums of money on D&I trainings that simply aren't effective <https://substack.com/redirect/18703925-5001-47c1-933c-e748b3063e76?r=3zjg0>. At Counterweight, we think that D&I is important, but we worry that these ideological and identitarian approaches flatten us as individuals, stripping us of our complexity and nuance. So, we started asking a lot of questions… In light of these developments, they further ask: - *What would a liberal approach to D&I look like? * - *How can we tackle discrimination and racism through a unifying lens? Do these approaches already exist? * - *Is there a more unifying way to tackle discrimination and racism than the divisive tactics of many mainstream D&I programmes?* These are very good questions. As I have already explored in my essay on the dangers of divisive and ideology-based diversity and inclusion trainings <https://substack.com/redirect/764c6e5e-078a-4679-ae05-b700062de048?r=3zjg0>, there are many negative consequences for the bottom line of the organization’s mission and for the relationships that we count on to deliver the services that the organization was set up for. This is true for just about every type of organization, whether it is for-profit or non-profit, which is why we need to find alternative models. The alternative models presented by the many speakers at the conference all fall under the larger umbrella of what Counterweight is calling “liberal democracy”. It’s important to note that Counterweight is a British non-profit, and so some of the terminology (and spelling!) will be British in flavor. It’s for this reason that I mentioned during my interview with Lauren Walker-Beaven that she might want to add a brief description of the word “liberal” which has a different meaning for Americans and perhaps other English-speaking countries. Here is what they came up with for the conference description page <https://substack.com/redirect/671dc066-5e5b-4354-8553-c7e690f93180?r=3zjg0> : We use the term 'liberal' to refer to all that is aligned with liberalism, rather than the newer US-meaning of the term connoting left-wing politics. Counterweight is a non-partisan organisation that believes that the binaries of left and right wing politics do little to help the polarised, sectarian world we now find ourselves in. We believe that universal liberal values such as tolerance, critical thinking, individualism and freedom are key to eliminating discrimination and racism. Find out more about Counterweight's mission and values here <https://substack.com/redirect/a1576de4-298c-4bc8-a65f-81bba3bdeda6?r=3zjg0> ! These are values I can get behind, and I’m honored to have been invited. If any readers are interested in seeing my talk, please click on *this link <https://substack.com/redirect/bc660815-a59a-47f2-b92c-6cf62e0e2139?r=3zjg0>*. The talk is taking place at 3pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). Hope to see you all there. *More Information about the Conference* Below is some more information about the conference. <https://substack.com/redirect/0d5cfada-f044-4af7-8aa9-ee6ecc52e7f2?r=3zjg0> *CONFERENCE PRESENTERS:* Jennifer Richmond, Laura Walker-Beaven, Harriet, Terril, Ian Rowe, Eric Kaufmann, Winkfield Twyman, Amiel Handelsman, Will Reusch, Mike Bowen, Wenyuan Wu, Joe Nalvan, Beth Feeley, Mike Yates, Jake Mackey & Mike Major, Isobel Marston & James E. Petts, Angel Eduardo, Ellie Avishai, Val Thomas, Erec S Smith, Rio Veradonir, Brandi Shufutinsky, Sheena Mason, Dina McMillan, Greg Thomas <https://substack.com/redirect/8e392e1b-b8cb-4586-b646-58c4917ac3f0?r=3zjg0>, Jonathan Church & Kai Whiting, Zara Qureshi, Ye Zhang Pogue, Zander Geig, Mike Yates, Christine Louis, Dit Sully, Mark Palmer, George Yancey, Lyell Asher, Steven J. Lawrence, Amna Khalid & Jeff Snyder, Simon Fanshawe, Jason Littlefield, and Roland Fryer. PRIMARY SPONSORS: Free Black Thought, National Association of Scholars, Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism, Institute for Liberal Values, Jewish Institute for Liberal Values *Counterweight Conference Press Release**Tackling discrimination through unity:**The Counterweight Conference on Liberal Approaches to Diversity and Inclusion* cw.heysummit.com <https://substack.com/redirect/287c89b8-4462-41fd-a31e-b6694c9c404c?r=3zjg0> >From the 22nd-25th September, Counterweight will be hosting the online Counterweight Conference on Liberal Approaches to Diversity and Inclusion, featuring pre-recorded talks from over 40 experts. In the past few years, companies and employees have felt increasing pressure to engage with D&I initiative. Some programmes offer useful insights into how we can create more inclusive workplaces. Too often, though, the ways in which people approach D&I come from ideological foundations that are divisive and sectarian in nature. In addition to this, companies continue to spend large sums of money on D&I trainings that simply aren't effective <https://substack.com/redirect/18703925-5001-47c1-933c-e748b3063e76?r=3zjg0>. At Counterweight, we think that D&I is important, but we worry that these ideological and identitarian approaches flatten us as individuals, stripping us of our complexity and nuance. So, we started asking a lot of questions… What would a liberal approach to D&I look like? How can we tackle discrimination and racism through a unifying lens? Do these approaches already exist? Is there a more unifying way to tackle discrimination and racism than the divisive tactics of many mainstream D&I programmes? Throughout the conference, we'll hear from experts in the field of D&I who can answer some of these questions. We hope that you'll come away with an understanding of how important D&I is and how we can approach it in a way that values unity, critical thinking and liberalism. We believe that D&I is for everyone: individuals, small businesses, community groups, NGOs or big companies alike. For this reason, we will be making the event available for free (for a limited period of time). All-access passes to the event are available for £50. Get your tickets here: https://cw.heysummit.com Ground Experience is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> Like <https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=266471&post_id=73773475&u…> [image: Comment]Comment <https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=266471&post_id=73773475&u…> [image: Share]Share <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> You’re a free subscriber to Ground Experience <https://substack.com/redirect/bd041bc2-db94-45a1-a309-6f2fe25ff017?r=3zjg0>. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> Subscribe <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> © 2022 Steven J. Lawrence 548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 Unsubscribe <https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9ncm91bmRleHBlcmllbmNlLnN…> [image: Get the app] <https://substack.com/redirect/f234a5b5-d13f-41e2-a20a-670a4877ba8a?r=3zjg0>[image: Start writing] <https://substack.com/redirect/cdfddfb3-ddca-49b0-a6e2-7d85d6a7adfd?r=3zjg0> -- P2P Foundation: http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net <http://p2pfoundation.net> - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: ; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens Curation of news on p2p/commons developments: https://www.facebook.com/groups/p2p.open/

1 0

Fwd: Invitation lecture Michel Bauwens - 'The role of the commons in the decline and rebirth of societies'
by Michel Bauwens 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Dear all, After 2.5 years at home, studying macrohistory to deepen my understanding of the commons, it seems interest is re-igniting now that the pandemic fears and the effects of its related public policies have largely subsided. I am off for 3 trips this fall, the first one this September will bring me to Sweden (upsala) belgium (ghent, brussels) and France (Finistere,Paris), the 2nd one in Lisbon and Barcelona and the 3rd is under construction but will certainly stop in Antwerp, Belgium. Below is an invitation for 19 september in Ghent, see the pdf for the description, You can register here: https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=3hyB1-_sbEmPkaF4YkG5nCf… Summary: THE ROLE OF THE COMMONS IN THE DECLINE AND REBIRTH OF SOCIETIES HOW PEER TO PEER COOPERATION CAN CONTRIBUTE TO SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS CENTRE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Lecture by Michel Bauwens – Ghent – Monday 19th of September 2022 – 15:00-17:00 ABSTRACT Most people would look at the history of human civilization as an evolving relation between market and state forms, and modern political struggles have essentially been a battle for supremacy between these two institutional powers. But there is a third, forgotten institution that has played a vital role in revitalizing and regenerating societies in decline and environmental overshoot: the institution of the commons. After centuries of decline, since the last decennium of the previous millennium, the commons have made a comeback. First through the emergence of digital open source communities, then through a tenfold increase in the number of urban commons since the crisis of 2008, and more recently, through the emergence of 'cosmo-local' productive communities which combine a relocalisation of physical production with global coordination of knowledge. If the current world situation can be read as a struggle between the market- dominated model of western capitalism, and the state-dominated model of the Eurasian axis, then the cosmo-local can be seen as a commons-centric alternative, based on the creation of new global commons institutions that are linked with a smart localization of production for human need. In this lecture, we will also look at the history of how human modes of consciousness have reacted to geo- climactic challenges, and what kind of educational institutions we could re-imagine to accompany such deep changes in human perception and action.

1 0

Re-igniting the p2p revolution (\0xDynamite)
by Michel Bauwens 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Thanks for the update. The list may be dead, but p2p and commons initiatives are still growing. In terms of technical alternatives, there seems quite a bit available and many people have left mainstream social media, think of Urbit for the libertarians, Mastodon, etc ... Urban commons have grown tenfold from 2006 to 2016, and the organizations I work more closely with, are all growing at a brisk pace, I think what has derailed some of the momentum is the polarisation in the political and social movements, with various tribes going their own way, using their own politically filtered platforms, with technical centralization replaced by distributed moral censorship for the ideas of the competing tribes. Michel O > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re-igniting the p2p revolution (\0xDynamite) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:47:32 -0700 > From: "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward(a)gmail.com> > To: P2P Foundation mailing list <p2p-foundation(a)lists.ourproject.org> > Subject: [P2P-F] Re-igniting the p2p revolution > Message-ID: > < > CAMjeLr9RJZrhqQKaCBCTxfAtkazmdFFfCmti0GSuAm5eQ4TRVQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > This list is dead. Either people didn't fully understand the > potential of p2p networks or the need for it got magically sublimated > into everyday capitalism. Nah. > > But what happened to the revolution? Where are the nerds and > cyberpunks who wished to change the world? Have they assimilated with > their billion-dollar IPO jobs and climbing the new curve of > exponential growth? > > The Internet under the standard client-server model has turned > everyone, one again, into consumers. The curve of GDP has gotten > higher with its new access to these elite tools. But it's a sinking > ship. Everyone knows this, deep down. > > An adult's cellular network generally becomes hierarchical with some > sort of strict immune system code at the top, holding dominant beliefs > about the world forming a sort of religious order which is called > their "ego". People come to identify with this and protect it. > > A child's cellular network acts more like a p2p network -- each is > equal in a mind that has no religion. The attitude is "whatever > works" and, internally, "whoever can do the job". Everyone else will > protect themselves -- you don't need hierarchies of security, > political correctness, or whatever new religion the world is > demanding. > > Be like the child. > > Mark Janssen > > PS. http://github.com/thePastor/Singularity > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > P2P-Foundation mailing list > P2P-Foundation(a)lists.ourproject.org > https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation > > > ------------------------------ > > End of P2P-Foundation Digest, Vol 136, Issue 1 > ********************************************** > -- P2P Foundation: http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net <http://p2pfoundation.net> - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: ; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens Curation of news on p2p/commons developments: https://www.facebook.com/groups/p2p.open/

1 0

Re-igniting the p2p revolution
by \0xDynamite 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

This list is dead. Either people didn't fully understand the potential of p2p networks or the need for it got magically sublimated into everyday capitalism. Nah. But what happened to the revolution? Where are the nerds and cyberpunks who wished to change the world? Have they assimilated with their billion-dollar IPO jobs and climbing the new curve of exponential growth? The Internet under the standard client-server model has turned everyone, one again, into consumers. The curve of GDP has gotten higher with its new access to these elite tools. But it's a sinking ship. Everyone knows this, deep down. An adult's cellular network generally becomes hierarchical with some sort of strict immune system code at the top, holding dominant beliefs about the world forming a sort of religious order which is called their "ego". People come to identify with this and protect it. A child's cellular network acts more like a p2p network -- each is equal in a mind that has no religion. The attitude is "whatever works" and, internally, "whoever can do the job". Everyone else will protect themselves -- you don't need hierarchies of security, political correctness, or whatever new religion the world is demanding. Be like the child. Mark Janssen PS. http://github.com/thePastor/Singularity

1 0