July 2011 - P2P-Foundation - lists.ourproject.org

Fwd: The Beach Beneath the Street
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

The Beach Beneath the Street: The Everyday Life and Glorious Times of the Situationist International A fresh history of the Situationist International by the author of A Hacker Manifesto. Over fifty years after the Situationist International appeared, its legacy continues to inspire activists, artists and theorists around the world. Such a legend has accrued to this movement that the story of the SI now demands to be told in a contemporary voice capable of putting it into the context of twenty-first-century struggles. McKenzie Wark delves into the Situationists' unacknowledged diversity, revealing a world as rich in practice as it is in theory. Tracing the group's development from the bohemian Paris of the '50s to the explosive days of May '68, Wark's take on the Situationists is biographically and historically rich, presenting the group as an ensemble creation, rather than the brainchild and dominion of its most famous member, Guy Debord. Roaming through Europe and the lives of those who made up the movement—including Constant, Asger Jorn, Michèle Bernstein, Alex Trocchi and Jacqueline De Jong—Wark uncovers an international movement riven with conflicting passions. Accessible to those who have only just discovered the Situationists and filled with new insights, The Beach Beneath the Street rereads the group's history in the light of our contemporary experience of communications, architecture, and everyday life. The Situationists tried to escape the world of twentieth-century spectacle and failed in the attempt. Wark argues that they may still help us to escape the twenty-first century, while we still can ... The book's jacket folds out into a poster, Totality for Beginners, a collaborative graphic essay employing text selected by McKenzie Wark with composition and drawings by Kevin C. Pyle. http://www.versobooks.com/books/980-the-beach-beneath-the-street _____________ McKenzie Wark Associate Dean, Eugene Lang College 65 w11th st New York NY 10011 USA -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

1 0

a p2p interpretation of bitcoin
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Hazel Henderson requested my opinion on Bitcoin: Dear Hazel, here are my comments: The great achievement of Bitcoin is that we have the very first "socially sovereign" digital currency, independent of government and corporation, that is workable, technically "peer to peer", and that it creates the enthusiasm of the hacker community, which almost certainly means it will be adapted and used later by more people. So, in this way, this is a tipping point. However, the Bitcoin design also has serious flaws. First of all, the way it is mined privileges the technical community itself as it can have access to networks of botnets to generate coins, in a way most people can't. Secondly it is a 'scarcity' based currency, subject to hoarding and wealth accumulation (only 21m bitcoins will be created, insuring a constant growth in value), that does not really change what is 'wrong' with the current currency system. As many so-called 'peer to peer' technologies (such as crowdfunding, crowdsourcing, etc..) it may increase wider participation and 'distribution' but without necessarily changing the dysfunctional neoliberal functioning of the market. There are also environmental concerns regarding the way Bitcoints are created through sometimes very long 'processing time'. Finally, it seems the current team behind Bitcoin is very libertarian in outlook and is supremely interested in evading taxation by the state, which depending on your own views, may be seen as politically and socially problematical. Nevertheless, what it really shows is that socially sovereign currencies are viable, and could be created as a tool of the countereconomy, though this would require a different ruleset for its functioning. so that true 'social' peer to peer values can be integrated in the design of future 'post-Bitcoin' currencies. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Hazel Henderson < hazel.henderson(a)ethicalmarkets.com> wrote: > Hi Kristy : Please post the two leading articles only at > www.ethicalmarkets.com on our Wealth of Networks page , thanks**** > > ** ** > > Hi Stuart, Susan, Leslie ,Gijs,Tom,Jordan,Michel,Ellen, Chris and Bernard : > So BITCOIN has now arrived , with articles in The Economist , Business > Week, etc I would like to publish a roundtable of your views on BITCOIN > on our site.**** > > ** ** > > Please send me your brief comments . Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > ** ** > > Hazel**** > > ** ** > > *From:* FeedBlitz [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:42 AM > *To:* hazel.henderson > *Subject:* P2P Foundation - 3 new articles**** > > ** ** > > **** > > Click here to read this mailing online.<http://archive.feedblitz.com/30834/%7E4037517/19757420/bccb0452b7b2bd0a0076…> > **** > > <http://www.feedblitz.com>**[image: Your email updates, powered by > FeedBlitz] <http://www.feedblitz.com/>** <http://www.feedblitz.com>**** > > > Here are the latest updates for *hazel.henderson(a)ethicalmarkets.com***** > > > **** > > <http://blog.p2pfoundation.net>**[image: P2P Foundation]<http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/> > ** <http://blog.p2pfoundation.net>**** > "P2P Foundation <http://blog.p2pfoundation.net>" - 3 new articles**** > > **1. **The revolt against financial predation in Greece is a historic > turning point in the awakening of European peoples<#130e7293c53dc6c7_130e098231495a87_30834_0> > **** > > **2. **Kevin Carson on Bitcoin and the Phyles: dystopia or utopia?<#130e7293c53dc6c7_130e098231495a87_30834_1> > **** > > **3. **Blue Labour’s relational state, a partner state?<#130e7293c53dc6c7_130e098231495a87_30834_2> > **** > > **4. **More Recent Articles<#130e7293c53dc6c7_130e098231495a87_30834_recap> > **** > > **5. **Search P2P Foundation <http://www.feedblitz.com/f?Search=30834> > **** > > **6. **Prior Mailing Archive <http://archive.feedblitz.com/30834>**** > The revolt against financial predation in Greece is a historic turning > point in the awakening of European peoples<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/V2Rh1i3kV_M/29> > **** > > “First they went for the Irish, and we did nothing; then they went for the > Greeks, and we did nothing; then they went for the Spanish, and we did > nothing; then they went for the Portuguese, and we did nothing; then they > went for the Belgians and we did nothing … this is how Europe was destroyed > and invaded, after the enemies of the people captured the EU and the > European state forms.”**** > > - history book, 2025**** > > *No, the above scenario is not going to pass, and the Greeks are fighting > for all of us!***** > > Excerpted from a very important editorial by *Jerome Roose* in ROARmag:*** > * > > (full article with links here<http://roarmag.org/2011/06/strike-protest-austerity-athens-greece/> > )**** > > “While the world holds its breath, some smart people are finally starting > to realize that this is not just a Greek crisis. Even the Wall Street > Journal now seems to recognize what we have been repeating endlessly on > ROAR, namely that *this is not a fiscal crisis in Greece, but a financial > crisis in the European banking sector*:**** > > What we have come to call the Greek crisis is, first, an international > banking crisis. Like Lehman Brothers, Greece is definitely not too big to > fail. It is too interconnected to fail, too interconnected to the > international banking system … What we are calling the Greek crisis is also > a crisis of structural economic dysfunction.**** > > Similarly, in an editorial yesterday, The Guardian wrote that:**** > > Discussions of the Greek debacle commonly assume that it’s a disaster made > in Greece that now requires the rest of Europe to step in and sort it out. > Wrong: this is a crisis of the eurozone, in which Athens is not a leading > actor but merely a stage set.**** > > Only dimly aware of the structural problems in the eurozone and the looming > insolvency of some of Europe’s largest banks, EU leaders met up with some of > the continent’s richest and most powerful bankers last night. In the > luxurious comfort of a Roman palace, they debated how the private sector > could contribute to a ‘real’ solution for the crisis.**** > > One of the options put on the table by the French was to roll over some > debt, buying Greece more time to get out of this mess. But while the idea > sounds appealing in theory, even the Financial Times has recognized that > “you’d have to be dropping acid to think that [this approach] is even going > to do its job of buying time for the next few years.”**** > > As the German Green Joshka Fischer pointed out in an op-ed yesterday, this > leaves us with only one realistic policy option: to prepare for a controlled > default. But since Europe’s leaders seem unwilling and/or incapable of even > considering this as a legitimate policy option, the people are going to have > to drive this option home themselves.**** > > Unfortunately for Greece and for Europe, the only way to demand a sane > solution to this overwhelming crisis right now is through a full-blown > revolt against the Greek political establishment and the foreign powers to > which it has been so beholden. From Syntagma Square, we are hearing nothing > less than a cry for revolution.**** > > As Costas Douzinas just put it in The Guardian:**** > > Syntagma has become Tahrir Square in slow motion. It is a peaceful, > democratic revolt that was easier to start because the fear of brutal > repression is smaller, but will be harder to complete as it faces the > enormous might of the European Union and global finance capital.**** > > Whatever the outcome, in the next 48 hours, the future of Greece, Europe > and the world hangs in the balance.”**** > > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=V2Rh1i3kV_M:0uaHhYxfb-o:7…><http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=V2Rh1i3kV_M:0uaHhYxfb-o:D…><http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=V2Rh1i3kV_M:0uaHhYxfb-o:2…> > **** > > **** > > > <http://www.feedblitz.com/f?FBLike=http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFound…> > **** > > • Email to a friend<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Fwd2FriendEdit=30834;690791;http://feedpro…>• Article > Search<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Search=30834;690791;P2P%20Movements,Empire…>• > Track comments<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Track=http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-re…>• > <http://www.talkr.com/app/text_to_audio.app?feed_url=http%3a%2f%2ffeeds.feed…> > •**** > > ** ** > Kevin Carson on Bitcoin and the Phyles: dystopia or utopia?<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/OGCR4rsk3DU/29> > **** > > *Kevin Carson*‘s take on Bitcoin <http://p2pfoundation.net/Bitcoin>, as > reproduced from The Bitcoin Sun<http://thebitcoinsun.com/post/2011/06/09/Bitcoin,-the-Darknet-Economy,-and-…>: > **** > > *“Neal Stephenson’s “The Diamond Age<http://p2pfoundation.net/Diamond_Age>” > was set some years after encrypted currencies and e-commerce removed most > economic transactions into darknets beyond the government’s capability of > monitoring and regulating, and thus caused tax bases around the world to > implode. This was followed, in short order, by the collapse of most > nation-states. In the ensuing Interregnum, the defunct nation-states were > replaced by city-states and by networked global civil societies called > “phyles.” The major phyles leased enclaves in most major city-states around > the world, much as the Venetian merchant guilds leased “Venetian quarters” > in the major port cities of the Mediterranean.* > > *Membership in the phyles <http://p2pfoundation.net/Phyles> was voluntary, > and the provision of the kinds of public services and social safety nets > formerly associated with states was generally tied to voluntary membership > subscriptions of some sort. This is, incidentally, the model of > service-provision in some unions like the Screen Actors’ Guild. Unemployment > benefits and health insurance are covered by a sliding scale premium, paid > as a percentage of income when a member is working.***** > > *This has been promoted as a real-world model for darknet economies and > resilient communities, in the impending age of hollow states, by such > thinkers as Daniel de Ugarte and John Robb.* > > *So you can imagine my reaction to Bitcoin, the “Peer-to-Peer Electronic > Cash System.”* > > *Jason Calacanis and his colleagues at LAUNCH describe it as “The Most > Dangerous Project We’ve Ever Seen” (May 15, 2011). Not only is it “the most > dangerous open-source project ever created,” but “possibly the most > dangerous technological project since the Internet itself.” It “could topple > governments, destabilize economies and create uncontrollable global bazaars > for contraband.”* > > *The beauty of it is there’s no central server network to shut down. Just > as with file-sharing, Bitcoin is traded from one desktop or mobile device to > another via public key encryption. So, short of catching and prosecuting > end-users with harsh punishments, there’s no way to stop it. And we all know > how well that’s worked out for the proprietary content companies.* > > *There are currently 6 million bitcoins, with a total value of around $40 > million. Bitcoins are generated by a complicated algorithm, with the total > number to top out at 21 million. After that, increases in exchange of goods > and services will be offset by the appreciation of bitcoins in value and the > deflation of bitcoin-denominated prices.* > > *This fixed upper limit and the requirement for price deflation thereafter > is one ground on which Bitcoin has been criticized. Another is that, since > it’s not denominated in a familiar unit of measure like dollars, it’s > confusing as an instrument of exchange for the average person.* > > *As an alternative currency geek, I’d add that you can only engage in > bitcoin-denominated exchange if you’ve already obtained bitcoins from > previous transactions. This is definitely a downside, compared with the > kinds of “mutual credit clearing networks” proposed by Tom Greco. Greco’s > mutual credit isn’t a store of value from past transactions — just a measure > of value for denominating exchanges of present or future goods and services. > The backing comes entirely from the goods and services themselves. Even if > neither party to an exchange has any credit, one party can incur a debit to > her account by purchasing a good or service from another, and then remove > the debit by selling a good or service of her own. The floating bank balance > works exactly like a checking account, except the system permits limited > negative balances for limited periods of time. Like the many local barter > networks that flourished during the Depression, it’s a system for > facilitating exchange even when there’s “no money.”*** > > *Despite my reservations, I consider Bitcoin to be grounds for enormous > excitement. Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge calls it “the Napster of > Banking” (May 11, 2011).* > > *As Falkvinge argued, it’s usually not the most feature-rich version of a > new technology that achieves the critical mass needed for popular > acceptance. Rather, it’s the most user-friendly. “…It takes about ten years > from conception of a technology, or an application of technology, until > somebody hits the magic recipe in how to make that technology easy enough to > use that it catches on. And when it does, boy, does it catch on.”* > > *Technologies for sharing digitized music had been around for ten years > when Shawn Fanning launched Napster. Video sharing had been possible for > geeks for a decade when YouTube came along. Falkvinge thinks Bitcoin will do > the same thing for encrypted e-currency. Bitcoin will do to banking what > BitTorrent is doing to the music industry.* > > *Here’s how Falkvinge describes the ramifications:* > > *“The governments of the world are on the brink of losing the ability to > look into the economy of their citizens. They stand to lose the ability to > seize assets, they stand to lose the ability to collect debts. No > application of force in the world is going to help: everything is encrypted, > and destroying a computer with any amount of police firepower will > accomplish zilch.* > > *All the world’s weapons in all the world’s police hands are useless > against the public’s ability to keep their cryptographic economy to > themselves….* > > *….The decentralized, uncontrollable economy where one lifetime employment > is no longer central to every human being is something I’ve called the swarm > economy, and I predict it will redefine society to an immensely larger > extent than the ability to get rap music for free.”"* > > *This is vitally important to a central theme in my work: the emergence of > non-state spaces within which the low-overhead informal and household > economy can function, outside the state’s ability to create entry barriers, > impose artificial capitalization and overhead costs on low-overhead > producers, and collect rent on artificial scarcity rents. It’s the > enforcement of their iniquitous “laws” that prolongs the corporate > dinosaurs’ feeble grip on life, and enables the usurers, landlords and > proprietary content owners to collect tribute from us.* > > *There are all sorts of possibilities for the alt economy, with a major > part of economic activity taking place via an encrypted e-currency.* > > *Until now, patents have been enforceable largely as a result of the low > transaction costs involved when a handful of oligopoly producers in a given > industry (who’ve often exchanged or pooled the patents) market a limited > number of models of goods through mass-distribution retail chains. What > happens when a garage micromanufacturer produces knockoffs of patented > mass-production goods – much like the Shanzhai job shops today running > knockoffs on the third shift, but with only 10k worth of homebrew CNC > machinery that can be bought for three or four months’ factory wages – and > there’s no verifiable record of the purchases?* > > *What happens when the unemployed and underemployed start taking advantage > of the technical possibilities for low-overhead household microenterprise, > in defiance of zoning and licensing and bogus “safety” and “health” > standards whose real purpose is to impose artificially high capitalization > and overhead costs and make it impossible to stay in business without a > sufficient revenue stream to amortize them? Say hello to household > micro-bakeries using ordinary kitchen ovens, home-based cab services using > the family car, household daycare and beauty salons, raw milk and meat from > animals without RFID chips, etc. — all bartering with each other and with > those above-mentioned garage manufacturers in an encrypted darknet economy. > And all while the state, aka the executive committee of the ruling class, > blindly gropes in the dark to prevent it.* > > *The biggest effect of file-sharing was to destroy all the artificial > scarcity rents of the content owners and cause an entire sector of the > economy to implode to marginal reproduction cost. As Chris Anderson said, > atoms also want to be free — they’re just not as pushy about it.* > > *Bitcoin’s importance can’t be exaggerated. Encrypted currency has been at > the Altair stage of development. If Bitcoin isn’t actually the Apple II – > and it may not be – we’re very close to it. If Bitcoin isn’t the Messiah of > the darknet economy, at the very least it’s John the Baptist preaching its > immanent arrival.”***** > > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=OGCR4rsk3DU:kaPGj7ypch4:7…><http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=OGCR4rsk3DU:kaPGj7ypch4:D…><http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=OGCR4rsk3DU:kaPGj7ypch4:2…> > **** > > **** > > > <http://www.feedblitz.com/f?FBLike=http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFound…> > **** > > • Email to a friend<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Fwd2FriendEdit=30834;690791;http://feedpro…>• Article > Search<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Search=30834;690791;P2P%20Economics,P2P%20…>• > Track comments<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Track=http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/kevin-…>• > <http://www.talkr.com/app/text_to_audio.app?feed_url=http%3a%2f%2ffeeds.feed…> > •**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > [image: List Building for Bloggers: Proven email stategies that build your > audience, increase engagement and grow your income. Launch pricing available > thru May 23, 2011.] <http://listbuildingforbloggers.com>**** > Blue Labour’s relational state, a partner state?<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/G3jtvijRth8/29> > **** > > *Jon Wilson* explains the relational bias of Blue Labour and its > conception of the state, which is quite related to our own conception of the > Partner State.**** > > Excerpted<http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/jon-wilson/blue-labour-realism>from a Open Democracy debate: > **** > > “The problem is that left-liberal politics imagines abstract values rather > than strong relationships bind us to act together for the common good. The > purpose of Blue Labour is to remind us how weird that is. Practically and > theoretically, it points out what it might be like to live a Labour politics > based on reciprocity and solidarity rather than abstract norms that have no > real meaning in people’s lives.**** > > For me, Blue Labour combines a challenge to capitalism with a belief that > the state doesn’t have all the answers. That’s an attractive political > philosophy for an activist and academic who’s never sure whether he’s on the > left or right of the Labour party. But it isn’t just about political > thought. It’s also about renewing real relationships that stretch across the > Labour party and beyond. As a participant in discussion which led to the > Soundings e-book ‘The Labour Tradition and the Politics of Paradox’ and > since, its been an honour to be part of some of the new connections and > conversations that have the greatest chance now of renewing the Labour > party. As a historian, my role in the Blue Labour enterprise has been to > remind the politicians and political theorists of something which Saul > Alinsky and Michel Foucault would have agreed: power has always only ever > been relational. It’s relationships, not just values, which change real > people’s lives.**** > > Alan Finlayson argues in his wonderful post ‘Making Sense of Maurice > Glasman’ that Blue Labour’s emphasis on relationships and reciprocity rather > than abstract values makes it disconcerting for many Labour people. For both > Finlayson and Stuart White, it is Blue Labour’s hostile relationship to > liberal universalism that is at issue. Finlayson suggests that this > hostility will ensure Blue Labour’s take up is limited. As he notes, “Blue > Labour has inadvertently proven just how hard it is in England to think > beyond the assumptions of the Liberal tradition”. White, by contrast, asks > for Blue Labour’s celebration of the history of local political struggle to > be blended with a left-liberal tradition of universal rights, that has > Thomas Paine at its centre. Neither are right, I think, because they > over-estimate the power of liberal concepts to explain how people actually > live their lives.**** > > …**** > > To judge when and how it should act, what I’d call the Liberal/Fabian state > relies on abstract values that impose universal rules. These days, its sole > criteria for success are statistics. As I was told by the Chief Executive of > the authority where I was once a councillor a few years ago, if you can’t > measure it, it doesn’t count.**** > > Maurice Glasman and the group who’ve come together under the banner ‘Blue > Labour’ argue that this political philosophy is, literally, worthless. The > free market and the centralised, statistically-obsessed state try to > subordinate the local peculiarities of life to universal values, whether > those values are established by the price mechanism or a language of > universal rights. In reality our lives only make sense within concrete > contexts and relationships. If the market or centralised state annihilate > those local contexts, life literally loses its meaning. Happily – and this > is our source of hope – such devastation happens rarely.**** > > Following Karl Polanyi, Glasman goes on to argue that local organisation > doesn’t only sustain the skills and virtues which makes life meaningful, but > the cash values that allow the market economy to work. Markets are only > sustainable when they’re driven by what Finlayson describes as “real > production carried out by real people making things that they care about”. > **** > > Alan Finlayson’s sharpest point is to note that this is an ‘ontological’ > critique of capitalism: to believe money is the source of value or power is > to believe something wrong rather than bad. But the point can be extended to > encompass the critique that Glasman and others offer of liberal politics > more generally. The problem with the liberal idea of the identical, > relation-less self-determining individual is not that it is bad (although it > is that) but that it is a false description of the way human beings act.** > ** > > My point here is that Blue Labour is not offering an alternative vision of > how the world should be, nor is it harking back to a by-gone past. What it > argues is that politicians should use the resources of a forgotten Labour > tradition to describe the way the world is now. Its realistic capacity of > describing how people actually are is why I’m far more optimistic than > Finlayson about its chance to politically succeed.” **** > > *The anti Liberal-Labour Ontology of Blue Labour: choosing relationships > and reciprocity over abstract rights and ideals***** > > “So what does this anti-liberal Labour ontology look like? I’d like to > emphasise two aspects. First of all, Blue Labour starts with the fact that > human existence happens in relationships. Everyday life, from birth to > death, is structured by the way we relate to other people, whether our > parents, lovers, children, colleagues or friends. The passions and reasons > that drive our politics are rooted in the concrete relational connections we > have with others. It is only after having a politically relevant > relationship that we can talk of abstract moral values to start with, even > if that simply means (as is rarely the case) a friend gives us a work of > political philosophy which inspires us, or a hostile relationship to a > figure in authority. The stories people tell about why they are Labour > always begin with an account of the concrete relations with others.**** > > This emphasis on the centrality of relationships does not make Blue Labour > a branch of ‘communitarian’ political thought, as both Alan Finlayson and > Stuart White think. Finlayson is wrong to suggest Glasman “fall[s] back on > the notion of a natural community” for example. Blue Labour’s political > philosophers – Jonathan Rutherford and Marc Stears as well as Glasman – use > the word ‘relationship’ far more often than ‘community’ in the recent > Soundings e-book. ‘Community’ has a nebulous abstraction that contradicts > Blue Labour’s concrete sensibility.**** > > Unlike communities, relationships occur all around us, and they provide the > basis for challenging the dominance of unrestrained capitalism. Most people > most of the time are doing things which are not ruled by the instrumental > logic of the market, or its statist surrogate. And both the market and state > rely on relationships that contradict the official logic of each. The > question is how, in increasingly difficult times, those relationships allow > us to do more than barely survive, and create lives in which we flourish and > find true meaning and fulfilment.**** > > Blue Labour’s argument is that for that to happen, the kind of > relationships which allow the good life to thrive need to be organised in > institutions which provide a basis for common action. What matters is not an > institution’s formal structure or the abstract principles supposed to rule > it, but how far it brings disparate people together in solidarity and > friendship to act together for the common good.**** > > Our everyday lives are full of countless moments, in many institutions > where there is the potential to do this – where, in other words, > relationships of friendship and solidarity exist that might become the basis > for common action. Faith groups, which often actively nurture solidarity, > are one starting point. It is faith’s distance from the liberal official > discourse of politics that makes it such a powerful starting point for > political action. But they are many others: the informal networks that young > parents create at the school gates; the pub or the coffee shop; the extended > family; the alternative family structures of gay and lesbian life; the > conviviality which still exists at the margins of the workplace; as Daniel > Hodges notes even that most unlikely place, the shopping mall. Faced with > the capitalist, bureaucrat and manager’s ever greater demand that we produce > abstract, meaningless value, human beings nonetheless possess the remarkable > capacity to create meaningful forms of common life.**** > > We aren’t so atomised common action is impossible. There are places where > that may be the case – former Labour heartlands where the demise of dominant > industries and reliance on nothing but an utterly un-relational state has > devastated collective. But in most places, solidarity exists – it’s just the > liberal (and neo-liberal) official language of politics make it hard to > recognise. The assumption that our polity is made up of nothing but > individuals on the one hand and the state on the other allows us to ignore > the places where collective action already wields power, for good or ill. It > allows us to forget the extraordinary lobbying force of the City of London > for example. More importantly, it fails to recognise where people who feel > they can’t make a difference are able to develop their existing > relationships into power that can challenge the commodification of > everything around them.”**** > > *The State***** > > “The challenge, I think, is how the state might be organised to nurture > common life rather than annihilate it. That needs a democratic central power > which strongly leads, but which recognises that its role is to coordinate > and balance between institutions that are closer to people’s lives than it > is. But ways need to be found to root public institutions within the balance > of interests that exist in local society. Maurice Glasman proposes the > creation of public bodies owned and controlled by a partnership between the > state, workers and local citizens, and the growing number of Cooperative > schools have put a similar model into practice. Such a model rejects a > simplistic opposition between local and centralised control, and formalises > the actual partnership between funders, workers and users which public > service delivery in practice relies on. Again, Blue Labour proposes reforms > which reflect how we actually are.**** > > What matters is practical relationship-building within public institutions > and the real not merely formal incorporation of citizens into > decision-making at every scale. What White describes as “a democracy of > confident popular self assertion” can only be built by developing strong > relationships and common life in the institutions of a particular place – > something our short-term political and governmental culture makes almost > entirely impossible. As well as constitutional change, local democracy > requires stability and the art of good local leadership over the very long > term. Instead of political science or management studies, the knowledge > which the art of politics relies on is necessarily historical.” **** > > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=G3jtvijRth8:roCiiPHXv4U:7…><http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=G3jtvijRth8:roCiiPHXv4U:D…><http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Eff/P2pFoundation?a=G3jtvijRth8:roCiiPHXv4U:2…> > **** > > **** > > > <http://www.feedblitz.com/f?FBLike=http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFound…> > **** > > • Email to a friend<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Fwd2FriendEdit=30834;690791;http://feedpro…>• Article > Search<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Search=30834;690791;P2P%20Movements,P2P%20…>• > Track comments<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Track=http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/blue-l…>• > <http://www.talkr.com/app/text_to_audio.app?feed_url=http%3a%2f%2ffeeds.feed…> > •**** > > ** ** > More Recent Articles**** > > - Links for 2011-06-27 [del.icio.us]<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/D6iWsQU32fg/mbauwens> > **** > - Links for 2011-06-26 [del.icio.us]<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/XRBSV_Y4GQ0/mbauwens> > **** > - Links for 2011-06-25 [del.icio.us]<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/cOndRhdv9j0/mbauwens> > **** > - Links for 2011-06-24 [del.icio.us]<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/YNLcHGlnYV4/mbauwens> > **** > - Links for 2011-06-23 [del.icio.us]<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/P2pFoundation/%7E3/hE2NVyt62Fg/mbauwens> > **** > > ** ** > > [image: List Building for Bloggers: Proven email stategies that build your > audience, increase engagement and grow your income. Launch pricing available > thru May 23, 2011.] <http://listbuildingforbloggers.com>**** > ------------------------------ > > *Click here to safely unsubscribe<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?EmailRemove=_MTk3NTc0MjB8MzA4MzR8aGF6ZWwua…>from "P2P Foundation." Click > here to view mailing archives <http://archive.feedblitz.com/30834>, here > to change your preferences<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Subscriptions=30834>, > or here to subscribe <http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?Sub=30834> > <http://www.feedblitz.com/f>***** > ------------------------------ > > > **** > ------------------------------ > > Unsubscribe from all current and future newsletters<http://www.feedblitz.com/f/f.fbz?EmailRemove=_MTk3NTc0MjB8fGhhemVsLmhlbmRlc…>powered by > FeedBlitz <http://www.feedblitz.com> **** > ------------------------------ > > Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz<http://www.feedblitz.com>, > LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498**** > > > **** > ------------------------------ > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1388 / Virus Database: 1516/3735 - Release Date: 06/30/11*** > * > -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

1 0

Re: [P2P-F] look at end of article and you see I mention p2p
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

thanks Mark! On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Mark Petz <ravenwyn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.europeandme.eu/13legs/638-markus-petz-environment > -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

2 1

Fwd: Video : Message from Japanese about saving children from radiation in - Fukushima
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

moving message: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dante-Gabryell Monson <dante.monson(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:04 PM Subject: Video : Message from Japanese persons - Fukushima To: hc_ecology(a)yahoogroups.com, sustainable_solidarity(a)yahoogroups.com, econowmix(a)googlegroups.com http://www.universalsubtitles.org/ja/videos/o9gtNtWoaqpZ/ "We fear a horrible world in the future, if we don’t stand up now to protect the lives of children." -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

1 0

Fwd: syntagma
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: George Papanikolaou <georgepapani(a)gmail.com> Date: 2011/6/30 Subject: syntagma To: Michael Bauwens <michelsub2004(a)gmail.com> http://nomadicuniversality.**wordpress.com/2011/06/30/** becoming-cockroaches-syntagma-**square/<http://nomadicuniversality.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/becoming-cockroaches-sy…> -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

3 6

Fwd: China
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Quilligan <jbquilligan(a)comcast.net> Date: Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:17 AM Subject: China June 30, 2011 11:04 pm Working out what China wants By Philip Stephens [image: Pinn illustration] We know what the west wants from a resurgent China. We have a pretty good sense of what China doesn’t want from the west. What’s missing from this story of global geopolitical upheaval is a clear idea of what China wants from its rise to great power status. Like many European and American commentators I spend a fair amount of time listening to Chinese scholars, officials and diplomats. A few years ago such figures were a rare sighting on the international conference circuit. And visitors to Beijing were left feeling that their interlocutors had been carefully screened to admit only one view of the world. Not any more. Some months ago I listened to a Chinese vice-minister casually acknowledge divisions at the illustrious Central Party School about relations with Washington. Some among the keepers of the ideological flame thought the US would only ever understand the currency of raw power; others that China’s self-interest still lay in co-operation as well as competition. Chinese academics speak quite openly, albeit off-the-record, about the conflicting currents in Beijing – between nationalists and liberals, generals and party leaders. The implications of the coming generational change at the top of the party are keenly debated. One leading scholar was heard to say recently that Hu Jintao, who steps down next year as China’s president, had been little more than a “petty bureaucrat”. The west was in for a surprise when the generation of president-in-waiting Xi Jinping took office. These young leaders had been shaped and hardened by Mao’s Cultural Revolution. They would not be shy of wielding power. Others are not so sure. One prominent (and very rich) business leader argues that the grinding process of getting to the top in the Chinese system militates still against a radical break with the past. What’s clear from most such conversations, though, is that Deng Xaoping’s admonition that China should hide its strength is nowadays observed more in the breach than the observance. Talk that China wants to take back charge of its East Asian neighbourhood is no longer met with protestations about a misreading of more benign intentions. The west, which, absent a coherent European policy towards the rising powers, mostly means the US and Japan, is pretty clear what it wants from the new China. It was summed up in the worn, but still useful, phrase coined by Robert Zoellick, World Bank president, when he called for Beijing to behave as a “responsible stakeholder”. This sees China taking its place in defending and developing the rules-based global order. Beijing has a point when it protests this is a western construction. Yet the US can argue that it has provided the essential framework for China’s rise. On the other side of the fence, Chinese policymakers make few bones about what they don’t want from the west. Top of the list is any hint of a challenge to China’s territorial integrity. Support for more autonomy in Tibet or Xinjiang or for Taiwanese independence is a hostile act – an effort to foment the break-up of the Chinese state. Second on the don’t-want list is a confrontation that would disturb the course of China’s rising prosperity. As much as it is now more assertive than Mr Deng might have liked, Beijing is anxious to avoid any rupture abroad that might jeopardise growth and social order at home. China will retaliate against, say, US arms sales to Taiwan, but within carefully-calibrated bounds. A third taboo is western lecturing about China’s political and social order. David Cameron was reminded of this this week when he received Wen Jiabao<http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9a467244-a0e0-11e0-adae-00144feabdc0.html#ax…>in 10 Downing Street. The British prime minister got a public dressing down from the Chinese premier. China had had enough of British “finger-pointing” about human rights. The snub was calculated. Accompanying officials let it be known that Mr Wen’s subsequent stopover in Berlin was much the more important leg of his European trip. This was partly, of course, because of the much more valuable trade and investment relationship between Germany and China<http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/d0244274-1a71-11e0-b003-00144feab49a.html#ax…>. But Angela Merkel, it seems, is also careful to make rather less of a public fuss about dissidents. Beijing does not want to see any extension of intervention in the affairs of sovereign states. If China joins in telling others how to behave, others will claim legitimacy in telling it how to behave. Liberal internationalism also makes it harder for Beijing to strike dodgy deals with dubious regimes producing vital natural resources. Chinese officials will agree there is sometimes a balance to be struck. Beijing has signed up to United Nations principles on the rights of citizens as well as states. But it will only go so far. Thus, while it allowed UN authorisation for intervention in Libya, Mr Wen insists the western military action was a mistake not to be repeated elsewhere. So far, so clear. It is when you ask about China’s ambitions for its place in the world that inscrutability sets in. Yes, China wants a role commensurate with its history as a great and ancient civilisation. Yes, its economic rise has greatly expanded its strategic interests. But does it want to shape a different international order? How far will it extend its military reach? Does it see its own political and economic model competing more widely with western liberal capitalism? These are questions that rarely elicit illuminating responses. Inference provides some of the answers. The activities of the People’s Liberation Army in the South China Sea and the present tilt of military spending point to the desire to push back US forces. A close alliance with Pakistan<http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/417a48c4-a34d-11e0-8d6d-00144feabdc0.html#ax…>underlines the strategic weight given to safeguarding China’s supply lines to and from the oil-rich Gulf. A strategy of divide and rule suggests a conscious desire to capitalise on Europe’s present weakness and undercut the Atlantic alliance. The more China rises, the wider will be the spread of its interests. How wide? China is not bidding to fill the role of global hegemon recently vacated by the US. There are too many natural constraints on its power – think geography, India and Japan as well as the US. Beyond that, we do not really know. But then nor, I suspect, does China. philip.stephens(a)ft.com -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

1 0

syntagma for blog
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

hi amaia, I'm on the road, can you add this to the blog, under the title "The End of Social Democracy in Europe" with perhaps some small comment, I'm not aware myself aware of the context of this, but have no time to look it up now, but it's powerful footage I think, Michel ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <xekoukou(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [P2P-F] Fwd: syntagma To: P2P Foundation mailing list <p2p-foundation(a)lists.ourproject.org> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S20_JuaX8gg Shouting "Get out of the Square!! Get out of the Square!!, Don't hit me!!" 2011/6/30 Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004(a)gmail.com> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: George Papanikolaou <georgepapani(a)gmail.com> > Date: 2011/6/30 > Subject: syntagma > To: Michael Bauwens <michelsub2004(a)gmail.com> > > > > http://nomadicuniversality.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/becoming-cockroaches-sy… > > > > -- > P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net > > Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: > http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation > > Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; > http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > P2P Foundation - Mailing list > http://www.p2pfoundation.net > https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation > > -- Sincerely yours, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis _______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

1 0

documentary on shareable economy
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

http://www.indiegogo.com/Web-Series-Documenting-The-Shareable-Economy Dear Sepp, while I'm on this lecture tour, could you look if this is worth sharing (embedded video) on our blog? Michel -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

1 0

Fwd: [opennetcoalition] EU Commission Kicks Off Campaign to Defeat ACTA
by Michel Bauwens 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: La Quadrature du Net <jz(a)laquadrature.net> Date: Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:38 PM Subject: [opennetcoalition] EU Commission Kicks Off Campaign to Defeat ACTA To: opennetcoalition(a)laquadrature.net La Quadrature du Net - For immediate release Permanent link: http://www.laquadrature.net/en/eu-commission-kicks-off-campaign-to-defeat-a… EU Commission Kicks Off Campaign to Defeat ACTA *** Paris, June 30th, 2011 – The European Commission adopted proposals for the ratification of ACTA, the anti-counterfeiting agreement. This opens the door to concerted citizen action in defeating ACTA, as it will be voted upon by both the European Parliament and national Parliaments. Among the many texts and policies that try to pave the way for the private censorship of the Internet, ACTA symbolizes the worse circumvention of democracy by a few narrow interests. Democracy must fight back. *** After having adopted the two proposals for the signing [1] and adoption [2] of ACTA, the Commission transmitted both proposals to the EU Council of Ministers, who will soon adopt them as well. Member States will ask their national Parliaments across the 27 Member States to vote on the text, which will then be put to the vote before the EU Parliament [3]. This secretly-negotiated agreement – far from being limited to trade policy – would impose new criminal sanctions to signatories that are both ill-defined and extremely large in scope. These sanctions would apply even to not-for-profit infringements of copyright, patents or trademarks [4]. In the digital environment, its entry into force could result in the development of extra-judicial modes of copyright enforcement. Under the guise of “cooperation”, ACTA would actually violate the right to a fair trial and harm Net neutrality and freedom of expression [5]. This strategy was once again reaffirmed by the European Commission copyright strategy [6] and the G8 summit [7] last month, and just yesterday by the OECD principles on Internet policy-making [8]. The ratification process opens the door to the mobilisation of EU citizens, corporations and NGOs, to work together in defeating this totally undemocratic agreement, bound to harm freedoms and innovation across the world. “The time is now! This is a historic battle in the "war on sharing" that we cannot afford to lose. Every citizen who cares for a free Internet, the protection of fundamental freedoms and democracy must participate in defeating ACTA. European and national members of Parliament must follow the example of their Mexican counterparts, and reject ACTA. All democratic means should be used to defeat this massive circumvention of democracy attacking our freedoms to protect a few obsolete industries.”, says Jérémie Zimmermann, spokesperson for La Quadrature du Net. * Références * 1. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&f… 2. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?lang=EN&ssf=DATE_DOCUMEN… 3. Further analysis of the two proposals of the ratification of ACTA will follow. 4. See our analysis of ACTA, and in particular of the abusive definition of “commercial scale”: http://www.laquadrature.net/en/acta-updated-analysis-of-the-final-version 5. See our analysis of ACTA's worst provisions: http://www.laquadrature.net/en/acta-updated-analysis-of-the-final-versionSee in particular article 27.3: Each Party shall endeavour to promote cooperative efforts within the business community to effectively address trademark and copyright or related rights infringement while preserving legitimate competition and, consistent with that Party’s law, preserving fundamental principles such as freedom of expression, fair process, and privacy. 6. http://www.laquadrature.net/en/eu-commission-sticks-to-flawed-copyright-rep… 7. G8 Declaration – Renewed Commitment to Freedom and Democracy, of May 30th, 2011: “With regard to the protection of intellectual property, in particular copyright, trademarks, trade secrets and patents, we recognize the need to have national laws and frameworks for improved enforcement. We are thus renewing our commitment to ensuring effective action against violations of intellectual property rights in the digital arena, including action that addresses present and future infringements. We recognize that the effective implementation of intellectual property rules requires suitable international cooperation of relevant stakeholders, including with the private sector.” Address: http://www.g20-g8.com/g8-g20/g8/english/live/news/renewed-commitment-for-fr… 8. http://www.laquadrature.net/en/copyright-interests-force-private-censorship… ** About la Quadrature du Net ** La Quadrature du Net is an advocacy group that promotes the rights and freedoms of citizens on the Internet. More specifically, it advocates for the adaptation of French and European legislations to respect the founding principles of the Internet, most notably the free circulation of knowledge. In addition to its advocacy work, the group also aims to foster a better understanding of legislative processes among citizens. Through specific and pertinent information and tools, La Quadrature du Net hopes to encourage citizens' participation in the public debate on rights and freedoms in the digital age. La Quadrature du Net is supported by French, European and international NGOs including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Open Society Institute and Privacy International. List of supporting organisations : http://www.laquadrature.net/en/they-support-squaring-net-la-quadrature-du-n… ** Press contact and press room ** Jérémie Zimmermann, jz(a)laquadrature.net, +33 (0)615 940 675 http://www.laquadrature.net/en/press-room _______________________________________________ Opennetcoalition mailing list Opennetcoalition(a)laquadrature.net http://laquadrature.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opennetcoalition -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

3 2