- implementations-list - lists.ourproject.org

<backspace> not bound properly in haskell-mode
by Keshav Kini 25 Jul '14

25 Jul '14

When I have a .hs file open in a buffer (i.e. with haskell-mode activated), it seems that typing <backspace> in <N> state actually deletes characters. Investigating a bit, I see that in other modes - such as message-mode, in which I'm typing this email - doing describe-key on <backspace> yields the following: DEL (translated from <backspace>) runs the command evil-backward-char, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `evil-commands.el'. In haskell-mode, however, I get: <backspace> runs the command haskell-indentation-delete-backward-char, which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `haskell-indentation.el'. The difference I notice is that in the first, we have "DEL (translated from <backspace>)", but in the second, just "<backspace>". From this I gather that evil-mode probably traps the key DEL, but not the key <backspace>. Should evil-mode perhaps trap <backspace> directly as well as DEL? Or is this a bug in haskell-mode, i.e. should haskell-mode be trapping DEL instead of <backspace>? -Keshav

2 2

Including Evil in GNU ELPA
by Stefan Monnier 19 Jul '14

19 Jul '14

I remember asking this a few years ago, but somehow I can't seem to find the answer. So here it is again: I think it would be great to include Evil in the GNU ELPA archive. Would Evil's maintainers be interested in doing so? If yes, then please get in touch with me, so we can work out the details (which mostly have to do with copyright paperwork, since we have the same policy for GNU ELPA as for Emacs, to make it easy to move code between the two). Stefan

4 5

evil: work on support for ]p, [p (adjust indent on paste)
by Johann Klähn 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Hi there, I would like to work on a patch to add support for ]p and [p to evil. I have some working code (see below) to adjust the indent after a call to evil-paste-after / evil-paste-before, but I would appreciate tips on how to integrate this with existing evil code (especially so that ]p will be a single undo step, that evil-paste-pop still works, …). All the best, Johann (defun get-common-indent-in-region (start end) (setq end (copy-marker end)) (unwind-protect (let (indentation) (save-excursion (goto-char start) (or (bolp) (forward-line 1)) (while (< (point) end) (skip-chars-forward " \t") (setq indentation (cons (current-column) indentation)) (forward-line 1))) (apply #'min indentation)) (move-marker end nil))) (defun my-evil-adjust-indent-afer-paste () (interactive) (unless (memq last-command '(evil-paste-after evil-paste-before)) (error "Previous command was not a line-wise evil-paste: %s" last-command)) (let* ((start (evil-get-marker ?\[)) (end (evil-get-marker ?\])) (common (get-common-indent-in-region start end)) (this (save-excursion (cond ((eq last-command 'evil-paste-before) (goto-char end) (forward-line 1)) (t (goto-char start) (forward-line -1))) (skip-chars-forward " \t") (current-column)))) (indent-rigidly start end (- this common))))

3 4

Vim Movement
by Gulshan Singh 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Hi, I'm wondering how if it's possible emulate Vim word movement using the same M-f and M-b bindings in Emacs? I've currently done this: (global-set-key (kbd "M-f") 'evil-forward-word-begin) (global-set-key (kbd "M-b") 'evil-backward-word-end) That's decent, but I think that actual Vim movement uses the evil-forward-word-end and evil-backward-word-begin methods as well. How can I do this?

2 1

binding to "cp" without breaking "c"
by Justin M. Keyes 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Hi, I'm trying to bind a command to the "unused namespace" that happens to start with "c". By "unused namespace" I mean things like "cp" or "co" for which there is no valid text object or motion. In Vim, you can bind "cow" and it does not affect the behavior of "cdw", "ciw", etc, because "o" is not defined as a text object. For example, in unimpaired.vim[1], "cow" toggles word-wrap. I would like to do this in emacs evil, so I tried: (define-key evil-normal-state-map (kbd "c o w") 'toggle-truncate-lines) It reports "eval-region: Key sequence c p w starts with non-prefix key c". But I don't want to unbind "c" because then I can't use the evil-change operator. I tried defining a custom operator, but after looking at the evil source code I couldn't figure out how to hook into evil-change to preserve its behavior while listening for "o" and then routing it somewhere else. It seems like I'm missing something, I would think this is a common task, but I haven't found any posts that address this. Thanks for evil, it's superb! [1] https://github.com/tpope/vim-unimpaired Justin M. Keyes

4 6

In Evil, Ctrl-o is not working like in Vim
by Ed Kostas 06 Jun '14

06 Jun '14

When I press Ctrl-o in insert state, then press :w, Evil remains in normal state after executing the colon command. When I press Ctrl-o in Vim, then the :w command, the command is executed and Vim returns to the insert state. In other words, in Vim, Ctrl-o executes one command and remains in insert state. In Evil, it remains in Normal state after executing the command. It would be fine if Ctrl-o had exactly the same behaviour in Evil and in Vim. Is there any reason for this not being so?

1 1

Opening a new line in evil-mode
by Dima Gorbik 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello all, Please take a look at the following piece of code: (goto-char (point-max)) (insert "\n”) In normal state of evil-mode goto-char moves the cursor to the end of line visually, but it points before the last symbol, not after. Although the example above works just fine — it works as if the cursor is pointing after the last symbol so the last symbol is not carried to the next line which is a correct behavior. I wonder how evil determines that it needs to insert after the last symbol, not before. The reason I ask about this is because I am trying to understand why hitting enter in haskell-mode repl in normal state in evil-mode puts the last symbol of the current line on the next line. It looks like (insert "\n") is invoked in a callback and evil doesn't know that it needs to maintain the compatibility. Thanks, Dima

2 2

Wrapping paredit-forward
by Nikolai Weibull 29 May '14

29 May '14

Hi! How should I go about wrapping paredit-forward so that it will work in normal mode? The problem currently is that once you hit a ‘)’ at the end of a line you can’t go forward any more, as point will be /at/ the ‘)’, due to the way Evil works, not /after/ the ‘)’, as paredit expects it to be.

2 4

Last character in visual selection remains unhighlighted
by Leo Alekseyev 28 May '14

28 May '14

Hi all, It seems that a lot of the time, visual selection for me is visually off by one character. For example, consider the following line, with the cursor at BOL. (123) If I issue commands like "vf)", "v%", I end with the closing paren under the cursor, but the visual mark will NOT include the closing paren, and will only include the first 3 characters, "(123". Now, it is important to note that if I then try to yank the selection, the yanked region is exactly what it should be, i.e. it will include the closing paren. As such, this defect for me is purely cosmetic, but a little annoying. Is this a known issue? Is it possible there is some misconfiguration on my part? Thanks, --Leo

5 7

campsites
by Kohut Rients 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

nham. Where di Ience. Unfortunately I had done nothing of the kind. The play was conceived before the Independent Theatre had come into existence. The end was foreseen from the beginning; the tragedy being implicit in the subject. The tragic motive lay deeper than the death of the heroine, who might have been allowed to live, if that last symbolic pageantry had not had its dramatic fitness. Given the characters and the circumstances, the end is the absolutely right one. Of course the circumstances might have been altered, and a sort of reconciliation patched up between husband and wife. But this would be a somewhat flat piece of cynicism, only justifiable on the ground taken by the _Telegraph_, that modern actors cannot play, and ought not to be expected to play, modern tragedy. The conventional "happy ending" demanded by sentimental critics to suit the taste of sentimental playgoers, the divided parents left weeping in each other's arms over the recovered child, would also be quite possible. But surely even a modern dramatist may for once be allowed to preserve a grain of respect for nature and dramatic art? This would be an outrage against both. It would not be decent comedy, it would be mere burlesque, as sentimentality always is to the judicious. The only other alternative I see is the exodus of the wife, with or without her child; or of the husband, with or without his mistress. But this would be rank Ibsenism, and outrage British morality, which would be still more dreadful. Only a "practical dramatist" could cut the Gordian knot, and at the last moment introduce the erring Mrs. Tremaine, still charming in the garb of a Sister of Mercy, to bring down the curtain upon a tableau of Woman returning to her Duty, and Man to his Morality. And I, alas! am not a "practical dramatist." Still, if the play had been an experiment, I might have further experimented with it, and rehandled its endi --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa. http://www.avast.com

1 0