March 2010 - Solar-general - lists.ourproject.org

Fwd: [ox-en] keimform.de: The Earth’s the Limit (2): Peak Oil—Peak Energy?
by Diego Saravia 31 Mar '10

31 Mar '10

seria bueno traducir esto ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Christian Siefkes <christian(a)siefkes.net> Date: 2010/3/31 Subject: [ox-en] keimform.de: The Earth’s the Limit (2): Peak Oil—Peak Energy? To: ox-en <list-en(a)oekonux.org> URL: http://www.keimform.de/2010/03/31/the-earths-the-limit-2/ [[1]First part] During the last years, [2]humanity has consumed about 500 exajoules of energy per year (an exajoule is a million million megajoules, or 10^18 joules). As usual, levels of energy consumption [3]vary strongly from country to country. While the average consumption per person is about 70 GJ (gigajoules), the inhabitants of [4]Bangladesh, [5]Eritrea, and [6]Senegal use less than 10 GJ on average. At the other extreme, the inhabitants of the [7]United Arab Emirates and [8]Iceland use 450–500 GJ per year, while per-capita usage in the small emirate of [9]Qatar is a whopping 900 GJ. Germany uses about 180 GJ per person—more than twice the global average. Other Middle European countries are similar, while the United States and Canada use twice as much (330–350 GJ). Is it realistic that in the future, everybody will reach the consumption level of Germany or the USA, or even more? There are reasons for doubt, especially due to the source of the energy we use. More than 80 percent of the consumed energy result from burning [10]fossil fuels: oil (~36%), coal (~27%), and natural gas (~23%). This is problematic for two reasons: (1) fossil fuels are non-renewable sources of energy that will be exhausted sooner or later. (2) The burning of fossil fuels is the main source of [11]global warming, the human-made climate change that threatens humanity and other species with dramatic and often fatal consequences. Peak Oil, Peak Gas, Peak Coal If consumptions of oil continues at the current level, we will [12]run out of oil in approximately 43 years. Estimates for the remaining gas and coal reserves are more varied. According to the estimates of the US Department of Energy (cited in the same source), gas will last for 61 years and coal for 148 years. Other estimates are somewhat more optimistic, but in any case it is clear that none of the fossil fuels will last forever. In reality, of course, future consumption levels won’t remain constant until reserves suddenly “run out”. On the one hand, consumption is likely to increase due to economic growth and due to the growth of human population (if world population increases from 6.7 billion to 9 billion in 2050, that alone would mean an 35% increase in the usage of fossil fuels, even if the average usage per person remains constant). On the other hand, easily accessible reserves are usually exploited first. At some point worldwide extraction of petroleum will start to decline, after accessible reserves have been exhausted and can only slowly be replaced by reserves that are more expensive and energy-consumptive to exploit. This point is known as [13]peak oil. In the US, the [14]peak of oil extraction was reached in the the early 1970s; since then, oil extraction has gradually declined. It seems quite certain that the global peak of oil extraction is not very far away. [15]Most analysts seem to suppose that peak oil will occur sometime before 2020; some believe that it already occurred in about 2007, before the start of the current economic crisis (oil extraction declined since then due to shrinking demand). When the oil supply starts to decline while demand is still stable or (more likely) growing, it will not only mean higher oil prices and possibly violent struggles for the distribution of the remaining resources. It will also mean that the resulting supply gap will be partially filled by a faster exhaustion of gas and coal. Most estimates therefore conclude that peak gas and peak coal will occur at most a few decades after peak oil, probably between 2020–40 for [16]peak gas and before 2050 for [17]peak coal. Since the energy gained from fossil fuels will thus start to shrink in the near future, humanity will have to learn to survive with less energy or to rely much more strongly on [18]renewable energy—or more realistically, both. (Nuclear power is sometimes advertised as another option, but it can’t fill the gap since it’s not really renewable and [19]suffers its own peak; also nuclear power would clearly be unsuitable for a decentralized peer economy for various reasons.) This will be quite a challenge, since only about 1.6% of the current energy comes from the renewable energy sources that have a large untapped potential—mainly [20]solar energy (1.3%) and [21]wind power (0.3%). There are other sources of renewable energy that currently play a more important rule, namely [22]biomass and biofuels (13.5%) and [23]water power (3.3%), but these have already reached a high share of their maximum capacity—they lack the theoretical potential to yield enough energy to replace today’s non-renewable energy sources. Solar power currently mainly comes in the form of [24]solar thermal energy used for heating; the contributions of solar [25]photovoltaics are negligible. (These and the following figures are from the [26]Renewables 2007 Global Status Report, p. 9, 12, 38, unless another source is specified.) If humanity wants to continue (or even increase) its current levels of energy consumption, it will have to increase the energy produced from solar and wind power by factor 50 or more before fossil fuels run out. Limited Renewable Sources There are some other renewable sources of energy, but their potential is limited. About 3.3% of the current energy mix comes from [27]hydropower, but the International Hydropower Association [28]estimates (PDF) that one third of the realistic global potential of water power has already been developed. If this estimate is true, it means that water power will never be able to contribute more than about 10% to the global energy mix. [29]Biomass plays an important role as energy source, mainly in the form of so-called traditional biomass: wood, charcoal (made from wood), and agricultural waste used for heating and cooking, especially in Africa and Asia. These “traditional” uses comprise about 13% of the global energy mix, while nontraditional uses ([30]biofuels and electricity made from biomass) comprise about 0.5%. But the Earth’s surface area that could be used for biomass production is limited. [31]According to the FAO (UN Food and Agriculture Organization), energy gained from wood accounts for 7–9% of the energy consumed worldwide (up to 80% in some developing countries), but wood fuels already account for 60% of the global consumption of forest products. [32]Forests cover about four billion hectares—30% of total land area of the Earth. 34% of these forests are primarily used for the production of wood and other forestry products; more than half of all forests are used for productive purposes either primarily or in combination with other functions such as recreation or biodiversity conservation. A large part of the rest (36% of all forest area) are primary forests largely untouched by human activity—which should better remain so, since wilderness areas are important for biodiversity and for keeping Earth a planet that is not totally subjected to utility concerns ([33]Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, p. 4, 6). So the area available for biomass production is already largely used for this purpose, since the 70% of land surface that aren’t covered by forests are usually needed for human habitation or agriculture (except where they are deserts or natural reserves). Even if the energy extracted from biomass was doubled, it wouldn’t account for more than one quarter of humanity’s current energy needs, and it is hard to see how more than that could be achieved. Modern biofuels don’t seem to do better than traditional fuel wood regarding their space requirements—ethanol and other biofuels already consume 17% of the world’s grain harvest (Richard Heinberg, [34]Searching for a Miracle, p. 48), but contribute only 0.3% of the energy produced. And biofuels have rightly [35]come under criticism for absorbing grain that could otherwise be used for human consumption and contributing to raising food prices during the last years. [36]Geothermal power is another source of energy that is marginal as of today but might play a more important role in the future. It utilizes heat stored below the surface of the Earth for heating or for generating electricity. Geothermal energy comes in two flavors: there are [37]geothermal heat pumps, which can be an efficient and decentralized approach to heating (or cooling) buildings. And there are [38]geothermal plants that generate electricity. This latter flavor is a large-scale technology that interferes much more heavily with the Earth; construction of geothermal plants has [39]triggered earthquakes (e.g. in Basel, Switzerland) and caused slow deformation of the land surrounding the plant (e.g. in the German Black Forest). This makes geothermal plants problematic, especially for a peer production–based society that favors decentralized and unobtrusive technologies. In any case, the electricity generation potential of geothermics is limited—[40]estimates vary wildly, ranging from 35 to 2000 GW. Even the highest estimate—2000 GW—, which is almost certainly strongly exaggerated, would correspond to only 13% of the current worldwide energy demand; space heating (which could partially be satisfied though geothermal heat pumps) makes up another [41]less than 16% of the total energy demand. Thus the contributions of geothermal energy are necessarily limited as well. So, while water power, biomass, and geothermal heat will be able to contribute to a global renewable energy mix, they hardly will be able to make up for the energy currently extracted from fossil fuels. The biggest part will have to come from solar and wind energy. [To be continued…] References 1. http://www.keimform.de/2010/02/09/the-earths-the-limit-1/ 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption 3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_energy_consumption_per_ca… 4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eritrea 6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senegal 7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_Emirates 8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland 9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar 10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel 11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming 12. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel#Levels_and_flows 13. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil 14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubbert_peak_theory 15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil#Timing_of_peak_oil 16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_gas#World_peak_gas 17. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_coal 18. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy 19. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_uranium 20. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power 21. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power 22. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomass 23. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydropower 24. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_energy 25. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaics 26. http://www.ren21.net/pdf/RE2007_Global_Status_Report.pdf 27. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydropower 28. http://hydropower.org/downloads/F8%20Hydropower%20and%20Sustainability.pdf 29. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomass 30. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofuel 31. http://www.fao.org/forestry/28816/en/ 32. http://www.fao.org/forestry/28808/en/ 33. http://www.fao.org/forestry/foris/data/fra2005/kf/common/GlobalForestA4-ENs… 34. http://www.postcarbon.org/report/44377-searching-for-a-miracle 35. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_vs._fuel 36. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power 37. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_heat_pump 38. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_electricity 39. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power#Environmental_impact 40. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_power#Resources 41. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption#By_sect… -- |------- Dr. Christian Siefkes ------- christian(a)siefkes.net ------- | Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/ | Blog: http://www.keimform.de/ | Peer Production Everywhere: http://peerconomy.org/wiki/ |---------------------------------- OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 -- When the great lord passes the wise peasant bows deeply and silently farts. -- Ethiopian proverb -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

1 0

Un nuevo juicio a Microsoft
by Marcelo Marti 31 Mar '10

31 Mar '10

Hola amigos de Solar, Después de tanto tiempo vuelvo a conectarme con Uds. Aprovecho esta ocación para compartir una noticia que encontré en la web y creo que podría serles de su interés Habla de una presentación juduicial en contra de Microsoft y abre la ventana sobre la protección de datos personales. También quería avisarles que visita nuestro país Andrés Velazquez, Director de la empresa Mattica. ¿Qué opinión tienen Uds. de él? Un Saludo a Todos. Perdón, me olvidé del Link, aquí va: http://blog.segu-info.com.ar/2006_06_01_archive.html

1 0

Un nuevo juicio a Microsoft
by Marcelo Marti 31 Mar '10

31 Mar '10

Hola amigos de Solar, Después de tanto tiempo vuelvo a conectarme con Uds. Aprovecho esta ocación para compartir una noticia que encontré en la web y creo que podría serles de su interés Habla de una presentación juduicial en contra de Microsoft y abre la ventana sobre la protección de datos personales. También quería avisarles que visita nuestro país Andrés Velazquez, Director de la empresa Mattica. ¿Qué opinión tienen Uds. de él? Un Saludo a Todos.

1 0

Certificaciones MySQL?
by Nicolás Reynolds 31 Mar '10

31 Mar '10

Hola, alguno/a tiene certificación MySQL? y/o sabe dónde se dan, qué tan jodidas son, y otra info útil para un camarada? :D -- Salud! Nicolás Reynolds, xmpp:[email protected] omb:http://identi.ca/fauno blog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ gnu/linux user #455044 http://librecultivo.org.ar http://parabolagnulinux.org

2 3

cerveza y dolencias...
by josx 31 Mar '10

31 Mar '10

Queria saber si alguien conoce alguna persona que conozca de producir cerveza artesanal y por otro lado algún médico que conozca bien acerca de las lesiones por el uso de computadoras.... Es para preparar un programa de Oveja electrónica... Necesito los contactos para ver si tienen ganas de salir por telefono o venir al estudio... saludos -- Di Biase José Luis Blog --> [http://www.joseluisdibiase.com.ar] "viaja hasta tu ideal, sembra tu flor, labra tu libertad, rega tu voz cerra tus ojos que sobra lugar en idilia para los dos"

4 6

La netbook que usa el mini... ¡un éxito en la República de los Niños!
by Fernando Cassia 31 Mar '10

31 Mar '10

Buen dia... Llegó la netbook que usa el "mini" de conocido programa de TV ... ¡un éxito en La República de los Niños! http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0019K96A0?ie=UTF8&tag=showitem06-20&linkC… (cuac) FC PD: La aprueban Gary Coleman y Tatu de La Isla de la Fantasia...

1 0

Fwd: [ox-en] Impressions from CPOV Wikipedia in Amsterdam
by Diego Saravia 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stefan Merten <smerten(a)oekonux.de> Date: 2010/3/30 Subject: [ox-en] Impressions from CPOV Wikipedia in Amsterdam To: list-en(a)oekonux.org Hi list! Last weekend there was another conference in Amsterdam. It was called CPOV Wikipedia (Critical Point of View). Again the following are some impressions from the conference. I'd also like to thank Geert for organizing this conference. It was a medium conference with I guess 100-120 attenders. Though the presentation style of some talks was quite improvable over all the conference was very interesting. The general topic of the conference was about the governance in Wikipedia - insofar it was a hot conference for the topics we are discussing here. I had hoped for a talk explaining all the governance facilities which are in place in Wikipedia - like mediators and facilitators but unfortunately there were no such talk. I'd love to have a good overview here. Jeanette Hofmann gave an interesting talk where she made the often seen phenomenon of high expectations in the beginning of a project and deep frustration later own. She asked the very necessary question on how to conceptualize this properly. Well, my guess would be to start with realistic expectations in the first place. Which fits well with Jeanette's observation that when starting a project people are often *so* a-historical in the sense that they always think that they are the first who tried it that way. A point I also made a couple of times already. Jeanette also quoted Boaventura de Sousa Santos a lot. This person made a lot of useful contributions around this topic. Probably worthwhile checking out. Another interesting point Jeanette made was about the tension of regulation and emancipation. Jeanette said that the goal or regulation is order while the goal of emancipation is good order. Whenever the order from regulation becomes bad emancipation steps in. Though I'd not use these terms I think this describes the dynamic of social systems quite well. A couple of the most interesting talks were about empirical studies about Wikipedia. One talk by Esther Weltevreden and Erik Borra studied controversies on the article about climate change (IIRC). It was very interesting to learn about how the controversies were handled in this case. One of their most interesting statements was that the new mode of knowledge production moves from truth and facts to the process of knowledge production. The talk of Andrew Famiglietti also was focused on disputes and their resolution in Wikipedia. One of the highlights was the talk by Felipe Ortega. He did an extensive statistical research on Wikipedia. He researched not only the English Wikipedia - which is usually researched - but the Wikipedias in the top ten languages. It was very interesting to see similarities and differences. For instance for all Wikipedias the growth is flattening over the years. Felipe stressed that these numbers can be and have been interpreted in various ways. One say that Wikipedia stalled, other say that Wikipedia matured. Together with Felipe I think the latter is the better interpretation - there is similar a limit to what can be represented usefully in an encylopedia. Another figure Felipe presented is that though everyone *can* edit in practice 5% of the registered users do 90% of the edits. However, it was not yet clear of which quality these edits are - may be a lot spelling correction or some such is part of these 90%. Stuart Geiger gave also an interesting talk from a study about the bots which are active in Wikipedia. He illustrated an example where a bot adds signatures in Talk pages if people don't do it themselves. One of Stuart's statements was that order is increasingly produced through technical means. It is indeed one of the governance questions arising from "Code is Law". As someone who "in the scene" for years now there was Florian Cramer. As he said himself Florian feels himself to be in the deep frustration phase Jeanette talked about. He outlined a couple of things peer production should have been / become but which didn't get reality. For instance the re-using of material is by far not as massive as expected. He also pointed out that Jim Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, has an extreme neo-liberal background (Ayn Rand and Friedrich van Hayek). This reminds me of the point I'm having in mind for quite some years now to understand the synthesis aspect of peer production better. One of his deep concerns is that peer production works only on a very generic level like Free Software and Wikipedia where everyone can agree easily. In fact an interesting thought which definitely needs to be explored further - beginning with the question what he means exactly. An interesting point in one of the discussions was that in the beginning of Wikipedia the main concern was about getting enough volunteer labor while meanwhile the main concern is to retain the available volunteer labor. A general critique I had for some speakers was the "they-should"-style they seemed to be so proud of - while at the same time taking all the benefits of Wikipedia like massive transparency of the project simply as granted. Meanwhile I'm a bit tired of this style probably. The more I was pleased by the statement from Joseph Reagle that people should make productive contributions. I think this is yet another important point where the Left differs from peer production. In peer production "I do" is much more welcome and useful than "they should". May be that's a point which needs further analysis anyway. A short thought goes in the direction that this "they should"-style is probably well for criticizing the state or other institutions which have some (alienated?) power. But Wikipedia? Well, as I said: An interesting point to explore further if we think about a peer production based society. Again the social aspect of the conference was very nice. I met a couple of people I just saw in Hull and a couple of other old friends. I also get to know a few new people. Again I made some notes about possible speakers for a possible 5th Oekonux Conference. Grüße Stefan -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

1 0

OT: “LA PARTICIPACIÓN FEMENINA EN EL ZAPATISMO DE CHIAPAS"
by Luciano Lamaita 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Luciano Lamaita wrote: > > > El 29 de marzo de 2010 17:39, gimena palermo escribió: > > Estimad@s <mailto:Estimad@s> nos contactamos para invitarlos a > participar de la charla > “GÉNERO Y MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES: MUJERES DE MAÍZ. LA PARTICIPACIÓN > FEMENINA > EN EL ZAPATISMO DE CHIAPAS” en el edificio de la Facultad de > Periodismo Y > Comunicación Social (diagonal 113 y 63). > > El intercambio con estudiantes, investigadores y organizaciones sociales > se realizará el día viernes 9 de abril de 2010 a las 16:00 hs., a > cargo de > la reconocida docente e investigadora Guiomar Rovira. > > Guiomar Rovira es Doctora en Ciencias Sociales y Magister en > Comunicación > y Política por la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, unidad > académica de la cual es docente en las carreras de grado y posgrado. > Además es autora de los libros “Zapatistas sin fronteras. Las redes de > solidaridad con Chiapas y el altermundismo”, “Zapata Vive” y “Mujeres de > Maíz” > > A través del siguiente link es posible acceder a una versión on-line de > “Mujeres de Maiz”, uno de sus libros más reconocidos, con traducción al > italiano, ingles y japonés: > http://books.google.com.ar/books?id=rw-rUDCrtbcC&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=muje… > <http://books.google.com.ar/books?id=rw-rUDCrtbcC&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=muje…> > > El Doctorado en Comunicación de la FPyCS – UNLP continúa de esta > forma con > la convocatoria de personalidades reconocidas en el campo de la > comunicación para que, desde un relato biográfico, y como actores > importantes en este espacio, contribuyan a pensar las complejidades > sociales contemporáneas. > > Esta es una actividad organizada por el Doctorado en Comunicación de la > FPyCS en el marco del “CICLO DE CONVERSACIONES EN EL DOCTORADO: > COMUNICACIÓN, CULTURA Y POLÍTICA”. > > Para participar del encuentro es necesario acceder al siguiente vínculo, > completar y enviar el formulario correspondiente. Cupos limitados. > > Inscripción: > http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=es&formkey=dEJuVXd1Q3VqSF9NYzA1N… > <http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=es&formkey=dEJuVXd1Q3VqSF9NYzA1N…> > > > Esperamos contar con su presencia. > > A su disposición > > Secretaría Técnica. > Doctorado en Comunicación FPyCS - UNLP > > > > > -- > Luciano Lamaita > > "A la vida es necesario brindarle la elevación exquisita del brazo y de > la mente" - Severino di Giovanni > > "Ser Libre no es un Don, es una Reconquista" > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > + <http://hipatia.net> > + <http://lunar.org.ar> > +<http://www.solar.org.ar> > + <http://liverta.wordpress.com> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > + jabber: luciano (at) softwarelibre.org.ar <http://softwarelibre.org.ar> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Solar.General es una lista abierta a toda la comunidad, sin ninguna > moderación, por lo que se estimula la libertad de expresión, el libre > flujo de información, el software y la cultura libre. > > Te invitamos a subscribirte enviando un mail a > solar.general(a)librelist.com <mailto:[email protected]> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Lista de Software Libre @ UTN-FRLP: > https://listas.usla.org.ar/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/teslag -- Saludos! -Luciano "A la vida es necesario brindarle la elevación exquisita del brazo y de la mente" - Severino di Giovanni ---------------------------------------------- Blogs: <http://liverta.wordpress.com> - <http://aty.hipatia.net/elgg/luciano> Mensajería xmpp/jabber: luciano(a)lunar.org.ar E-mail: lucianolamaita(at)ovejafm.com ---------------------------------------------- "Ser Libre no es un Don, es una Reconquista" ------------------------------------------------- Unite a la lista solar libre enviando un e-mail a solar.general(a)librelist.com

1 0

Conferencia de Richard Stallman, 14 de abril 2010
by Marcos Germán Guglielmetti 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Conferencia de Richard Stallman, 14 de abril 2010 http://musix.org.ar/index.html El Miércoles 14 de Abril, a las 15 horas el padre del movimiento del software libre, Richard Stallman, dará una conferencia gratuita en el Centro “Roberto de Vicenzo” situado a 2 cuadras de la estación de Berazategui. El evento está dirigido a todo el publico interesado y se invitará a las escuelas de la zona, medios de difusión, empresarios, etc. Luego habrá una reunión de Stallman con los integrantes de los grupos de usuarios de Software libre que se hayan inscripto. Vale la pena aclarar que estamos organizando el sitio para coordinar todo y faltan algunas cosas. Todo aquel que tenga ganas de colaborar con el evento será bien recibido, mientras tanto pedimos a los que puedan que nos ayuden difundiendo esto. Cualquier inquietud, mientras tanto, si quieren inscribirse, participar de la próxima reunión organizativa, o colaborar de cualquier forma escribir un mail a : arqdietz[at]yahoo[dot]com[dot]a saludos! (quienes vivan cerca, nos vemos alli...) Por favor, difundir! -- Marcos Guglielmetti www.musix.org.ar www.ovejafm.com _______________________________________________ La lista solar-general es un canal de comunicación de SoLAr por el libre intercambio de ideas de todos los interesados en el movimiento de software libre. Debido a su libre suscripción y publicación, y dado que no existe ningún tipo de moderación previa ni posterior, es un excelente lugar para compartir opiniones, elaborar políticas y prácticas por el Software Libre en Argentina y el mundo. Tal como dice en ourproject: "La lista de todos y todas en solar" http://ourproject.org/mail/?group_id=23 Te invitamos a subscribirte enviando un mail a solar.general(a)librelist.com ¡Asociate a SOLAR!: http://www.solar.org.ar/?article573 * por la restauración del historial de solar-socios (dejó de funcionar el 25 de nov de 2009) * por la apertura del sitio solar.org.ar y de solar-socios para todo el movimiento * por el fin de la censura contra el compañero Saravia y contra todos los compañeros * por el fin de las mociones represivas que generan malestar entre los miembros * por la inmediata reincorporación de cualquier socio del movimiento SL expulsado * por la reapertura de solar-general y del wiki.solar.org.ar * por la discusión de principios para ampliar la participación http://musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php/Principios_participativos

1 0

[SOLAR - Software Libre Argentina] Las novedades
by inet＠solar.org.ar 30 Mar '10

30 Mar '10

Hola Este es el boletín de información del sitio "SOLAR - Software Libre Argentina" (http://www.solar.org.ar) Este boletín reseña los artículos y breves publicados desde 5 días. Nuevos artículos -------------------------- ** Fuimos a charlar de Software y Cultura Libre con FM Reconquista ** por Vladimir di Fiore - 26 de marzo de 2010 El pasado sábado 20 de marzo en el marco de Conocer para Elegir participamos de los festejos por los 22 años de FM Reconquista, compartiendo con ellos y la gente del barrio una charla sobre Software y Cultura Libre. FM Reconquista es una radio comunitaria ubicada en José León Suarez, partido de San Martin, provincia de Buenos Aires. La radio es parte de la Asociación civil de mujeres la Colmena y desde hace 22 años trabajan haciendo radio con y para el barrio. La charla que compartimos fue (...) -> http://www.solar.org.ar/spip.php?article749

1 0