July 2010 - Solar-general - lists.ourproject.org

offtopic: autotrabajo
by Diego Saravia 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Stefan Meretz <stefan(a)meretz.de> Date: 2010/7/20 Subject: [ox-en] keimform.de: Productive pigs and unproductive children To: list-en(a)oekonux.org http://www.keimform.de/2010/productive-pigs-and-unproductive-children/ Productive pigs and unproductive children Von StefanMz <http://www.keimform.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/paid_unpaid_labor-300x190…> In our economy-driven society it is taken for granted, that it is »the economy« which produces the societally necessary goods. However, this is not the case, which can be impressively shown by looking into official statistics. The german Federal Statistical Office has carried out two »time usage surveys«, one in 1991/92 and one in 2001/02, by which it was determined what time people use for what kind of activity. In a preface of a booklet presenting the results the secretary being responsible at that time wrote: The fact, that quality of life in our society especially needs those works, which are not paid and not taken into account by national economy statistics—like housekeeping, child education, civil engagement, and honorary works—this fact is vividly and highly visible presented by this survey. Before judging the survey—in contrast to the secretary ending her preface with the cited sentence—some results will be presented previously. I will focus on data concerning paid and unpaid labor. Unpaid labor apply to all household activities (so called household production), and care and support as well as honorary activities. The illustration shown above (click to enlarge) shows the year-volume of unpaid and paid labor, in each case for the period of the first and second survey. By calculating the proportions of labor being entirely necessary in society, one gets a fraction of approx. *63%* unpaid and *37%* paid labor for both periods (with a minimal shift towards paid labor). However, the home-to-office times had been reported separately. If adding these efforts to unpaid labor (which usually should be the case: although necessary for gainful employment no money is received for it), one gets a fraction of approx. *65.5%* unpaid and *34.5%* paid labor. All in all one can assume a relationship of *two third of unpaid labor* to *one third of paid labor* . Furthermore, if one thinks of the findings of Karl Marx, that the value of the labor power is determined by the costs to re-/build it, then aspects separated by the survey like _regeneration_ (free time, recreation, media usage) and _continuing education_ had to be included as well. However, since the survey is a time based study, monetary costs cannot be determined. Also assisting times for persons needing care are rather underestimated, because »the permanent on-call duty« (Schäfer) is not incorporated. Etc. More points could be mentioned more and more generally _questioning the_ _treatment of activities of life as being »labor«_—and not only the fact, whether they are paid or not. It is funny that the analysis of the survey data tries to calculate the »value« of the unpaid labor. An after tax payment of 6 Euro (1991/92) and 7 Euro (2001/02) respectively is assumed. By adding usual social services the amounts could be doubled. If one is doing calculations already then all pass through used-up and long-lasting goods have to be comprised, too. Finally one ends up with a »household enterprise«, which could be compared with a »normal« business company. Its GDP (gross domestic product) proportion is about 43% and 40% respectively. Calculating base is the after tax payment mentioned above for the »household enterprise«. If one inserts pre-tax earnings or average production wages instead, this would lead to completely different results which means, that numerical games based on monetary values are basically pointless. What does it mean when twice as much of necessary activities in a society are done unpaid than paid? First, one should accept the fact, that this is the case! The »economy« is—in terms of time—not the most important sphere of societally necessary activities. At the same time its logics are totally dominant: Only what pays off will be done economically, will be exploited. In this logics no exploitation means misfortune, poverty, exclusion, crash. The »non-economy« is the other side of the »economy« in a double sense: Without its contributions »economy« would not be possible. »Non-economy« catches all those activities which have to be done but are not exploitable. At the same time it is the pool of potentially exploitable »worthless« things: More and more activities are graped by the logics of exploitation and formed by its image (e.g. commercialized care activities which are scaled by minutes, whereas human attention remains an alien task). Finally, it is not astonishing, that both fields are structured by gender (the survey analyzes the »non-economy« in respect of gender specificity): the »female non-economy« is opposed by a »male economy«. Here we find the same general relation of exploitation and not-yet- exploited: What is currently not the case can emerge in the future. Or the other way around: Whose labor power is exploitable, is allowed to do the physical and psychic clean-up in the split-off »non-sphere«. The economist Friedrich List <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_List> already knew: Who rears pigs is a productive, who rears children is an unproductive member of society. Exactly there we are yet today. *Literature* Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (Hrsg.), Wo bleibt die Zeit? Die Zeitverwendung der Bevölkerung in Deutschland 2001/02 (german) D. Schäfer, Unbezahlte Arbeit und Haushaltsproduktion im Zeitvergleich, in: Statistisches Bundesamt (Hrsg.), Alltag in Deutschland. Analyse zur Zeitverwendung, Forum der Bundesstatistik, Band 43, 2004, S. 247-273 (german). Sources online: time usage survey (german: Zeitbudgeterhebung) <http://is.gd/dzoFm> -- Start here: www.meretz.de _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt(a)oekonux.de -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

2 1

perl 6, el operador "*+*" y fibonacci
by Diego Saravia 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

What does PL/Perl 6 look like? Here is a nice example of a PL/Perl6 function which calculates the sum of all Fibonacci numbers <= 100: CREATE FUNCTION test_fibonacci_plperl6(integer) RETURNS int LANGUAGE plperl6 AS $$ [+] (1, 1, *+* ... 100) $$; You will notice three spiffy new Perl 6 operators in there, the summation operator [+], the new range operator ... (which used to be .. in Perl 5), and the *+* operator. What exactly is the *+* operator? pmichaud++ jokingly referred to it as the "cheerleading plus", but it is actually just a plain old infix "+" operator, sandwiched by two "*" (a.k.a Whatever) operands. It basically takes the previous two elements in a list, sums them together and returns the sum, which is exactly how the Fibonacci sequence is defined. -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

1 0

+ soft "publico"
by Diego Saravia 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

http://www.puntogov.com/nota.asp?nrc=2449&nprt=1 -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

1 0

Fwd: [Parrot-users] Parrot Babysteps - a PIR tutorial for novices - works on 2.6
by Diego Saravia 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Brian Wisti <brian.wisti(a)gmail.com> Date: 2010/7/21 Subject: [Parrot-users] Parrot Babysteps - a PIR tutorial for novices - works on 2.6 To: parrot-users(a)lists.parrot.org Hey all, This may be my first post to the mailing list. Anyways - I've got a tutorial / journal / blog-type-thing about learning the basics of Parrot PIR syntax and creating small projects. I thought that now seemed like as good a time as any to mention it and also to mention that it is now compatible with yesterday's 2.6 release. http://coolnamehere.com/geekery/parrot/learn/ The Parrot Babysteps are definitely for the novice. You won't master PIR with them, you won't be making languages with them any time soon, and you probably won't solve any of the world's problems with them. However, you will hopefully have a better understanding of how to accomplish simple tasks using Parrot after you've finished the steps. I add to them when time allows, but my main point of pride is that I keep the material relevant to whatever the latest supported release happens to be. I even keep a github repository of the sample code and tests to ensure that they behave the way I claim they do in the text of the steps. http://github.com/brianwisti/parrot-babysteps Please check out the Babysteps and let me know what you think! I would love for those pages to become good enough that you feel comfortable sending the link to your friends who say "Parrot sounds lovely, but how do I get *started*?" Kind Regards, Brian Wisti http://coolnamehere.com _______________________________________________ Parrot-users mailing list Parrot-users(a)lists.parrot.org http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-users -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

1 0

como usa stallman el SL
by Diego Saravia 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

http://stallman.org/stallman-computing.html -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

2 1

google
by Diego Saravia 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

http://www.lanacion.com.ar/nota.asp?nota_id=1286305 -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

3 3

software trucho, persecucion
by Diego Saravia 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

http://www.ebizlatam.com/news/123/ARTICLE/11886/2010-07-12.html http://www.canal-ar.com.ar/noticias/noticiamuestra.asp?Id=9079 -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia(a)gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa(a)unsa.edu.ar

3 2

OT: servicio tecnico asus en Argentina
by Pablo Manuel Rizzo 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

Saben si hay algún servicio tecnico oficial de Asus? Mi eeepc se apagó de repente y no enciende. Gracias -- Pablo Manuel Rizzo ------------------------------- http://pablorizzo.com -------------------------------

2 2

Gates Keepers
by Nicolás Reynolds 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

Conocian este blog? "Civil society voices on the activities of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation" http://gateskeepers.civiblog.org/blog -- Salud! Nicolás Reynolds, xmpp:[email protected] omb:http://identi.ca/fauno mblog:http://selfdandi.com.ar/ gnu/linux user #455044

1 0

Re: [Solar-general] Funciona en Musix GNU+Linux: Placa De Red Usb
by david fernandez 20 Jul '10

20 Jul '10

From: Marcos Germán Guglielmetti <marcos(a)ovejafm.com> Subject: [Solar-general] Funciona en Musix GNU+Linux: Placa De Red Usb Wireless Adapter Kozumi K-300mwu Con Antena To: Lista de usuarios de Musix <musix-usuarios(a)lists.ourproject.org>, La lista de todos y todas en solar <solar-general(a)lists.ourproject.org> Message-ID: <201007200228.28211.marcos(a)ovejafm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hola Contento de informar que la Placa De Red Usb Wireless Adapter Kozumi K-300mwu Con Antena anda en Musix 2.0 La compré en un local de Junín, pero veo que está acá también: http://articulo.mercadolibre.com.ar/MLA-90223056-placa-de-red-usb-wireless-… Lo bueno de estas placas externas usb wifi es que traen un chip Realtek 8187 por lo cual no se necesita firmware privativo para accionarlas. 100% Software Libre en Musix. Si tienen una notebook o PC de escritorio con una placa de red que les pide un firmware privativo, este usb wifi es una opción interesante. Además anda muy muy bien, toma la señal "bien clarito", mejor que cualquier otra que haya probado Recomendable. acá el manual (no lo necesité, Musix detectó automáticamente el hardware y con network manager actualizado anduvo bien) http://www.kozumi-usa.com/files/K300MWU%20Spanish%20User%20Manual.pdf Marcos una pregunta, puede ser que aya un software privativo para esa placa? -- David Fernandez GTalk: rdavidgeek E-mail: davidfernandez(a)riseup.net

3 2