[Solar-general] scilab libre?

[Diego Saravia]

US Copyright Office Circular 14: Derivative Works notes that:

    A typical example of a derivative work received for registration
in the Copyright Office is one that is primarily a new work but
incorporates some previously published material. This previously
published material makes the work a derivative work under the
copyright law. To be copyrightable, a derivative work must be
different enough from the original to be regarded as a "new work" or
must contain a substantial amount of new material. Making minor
changes or additions of little substance to a preexisting work will
not qualify the work as a new version for copyright purposes. The new
material must be original and copyrightable in itself. Titles, short
phrases, and format, for example, are not copyrightable.


es decir que segun esto, pequeños cambios no estarian prohibidos.

o sea no estaria prohibido usar el scilab comercialmente aun con
pequeñas correcciones o modificaciones de errores.



2008/4/13, Diego Saravia <dsa en unsa.edu.ar>:
> El 13/04/08, Santiago Roza <santiagoroza en gmail.com> escribió:
>
> > 2008/4/13 Diego Saravia <dsa en unsa.edu.ar>:
>  >
>  >
>  > >  Aparentemente nada prohibe modificar el scilab y
>  >  >  distribuirlo comercialmente, si estaria prohibido hacerlo con una
>  >  >  nueva obra derivada del scilab
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > me parece que no es ese el concepto.  si modificas scilab y lo
>  >  redistribuis, ya no es "el scilab", es una obra derivada de scilab.
>  >  lo mismo para cualquier otro programa.  o sea, aunque el cambio sea
>  >  minimo, ya no es exactamente la misma obra.
>  >
>  >
>
>
> linkearlo en otra obra es modificarlo?
>
>  http://www.rosenlaw.com/lj19.htm
>
>  http://www.linux.com/articles/113252
>
> --
>  Diego Saravia
>  Diego.Saravia en gmail.com
>  NO FUNCIONA->dsa en unsa.edu.ar
>


-- 
Diego Saravia
Diego.Saravia en gmail.com
NO FUNCIONA->dsa en unsa.edu.ar