JoPP-Public

Download

[email protected]

April 2015

5 participants
2 discussions

Updates about JoPP special issue on Feminism and (Un)hacking
by sophie toupin 27 Sep '15

27 Sep '15

Dear all, I hope this email finds you well. I would like to briefly update you on where we are at with the Special Issue on Feminism and (Un)hacking and some of the thought provoking reflection we are having with this issue currently. At a more mundane level, we are pleased to inform you that the first round of peer review has been completed and we should start the second round in May. So all is good on that front. On a more thought provoking aspect, we have been pondering for quite some time now on how to handle the order of editors. So far in our communication we have been using a standard alphabetical order. Lilly in our group suggested to create a pen name out of our three names to have a single editor for the Special Issue. The idea of a pen-name is inspired in part by the work of radical feminist geographers J.K. Gibson-Graham who did just that a few years ago. We all feel our special issue is perfect for such experimentation as it is a hack on the academic publishing system and the hierarchical order it imposes on researchers. Our introductory article to the Special Issue will probably begin with an explanation of our own contribution to feminist hacking: That is a “HowTo” on how to hack academic standards and traditions from a feminist and queer perspective, while giving equal recognition to all for their work. Also, we feel that the choice of a pen-name does not erase our identities as individuals, but rather aim at questioning and initiating a discussion about the nature of work, scholarship, expertise, and authority from a feminist and queer framework. We are all super enthusiastic about the idea of resisting the traditional authorship structure in our special issue. We hope you will be as excited as we are about this experimentation. Very best, SSL Nagbot (SSL= Secure Sockets Layer, or if you prefer, Shaowen, Sophie, Lilly)

6 10

Serious Fun - Aarhus 2015 Workshop - Call for Participation
by Maurizio Teli 30 Apr '15

30 Apr '15

Dear all, Apologies for cross-posting. We want to invite you to join our workshop at the next Aarhus 2015 Conference on Critical Alternatives (17-21 August 2015). Best M. --- Serious Fun: Designing a Game to Promote Critical Computing Practices Beyond Capital A workshop at Aarhus 2015 Conference on Critical Alternatives (August, 17-21) Many of us grew up playing a game called Monopoly—it was about property, and winning other people’s money and land. But is that really the world we want? What if there were a different game? The original version of the game that became Monopoly was designed to reward very different behavior. Its aim was to be critique of capital. The creator, Elizabeth Magie Philips, called it The Landlord’s Game. Like Ms. Philips, we want a different game, one that will reward a different set of alternative, critical values. So, we need to articulate the different values that we want to inform our future. Toward which values would we re-orient what motivates future societies? How would we institutionalize these values in our future world? What kinds of practices and relationships will they encourage? If these values were to motivate people in a game, what would the game look like? At the Conference on Critical Alternatives, we want to make a different game—and we hope you will help create it. More information at http://computing-beyond-capital.ghost.io/ How to participate The workshop starts with a matter of fact: that contemporary societies are struggling to cope with the ongoing economic crisis and with the social problems caused by a crisis of capitalism itself. This fact suggests we need to articulate critical alternatives to capital in all aspects of social life. While computing professionals were in many ways responsible for the crisis, computing practices like Free Software and Participatory Design are also suggestive of alternative values. By building on these alternatives, people who compute can contribute to creating an alternative future. The Landlord’s Game was a critique of capitalism. With this inspiration, the workshop will identify key values and practices able to sustain the emergence of “beyond capital” computing alternatives. For example, real properties in Monopoly might be reversed into commons promoted by alternative computing practices, and groups of alternative institutions (like the groups of real properties in Monopoly). Creating a game could create the vision of ways of living “beyond capital. The workshop will build upon a group discussion of suggestions from participants about the appropriate set of values promoting critical alternatives, as articulated in papers (maximum 1000 words). In these papers, participants will make an argument for the inclusion of three values they think central for a future society, define these values, and describe their relations to actual computing practices. Group-work will then focus on how pursuit of these computing-related values can be built into institutions, and thus how they can be embodied in “chance” game activities. At the end of the workshop the game ideas will be combined in a mock-up of a Beyond Capital, forward-looking board game. If you want to participate please send a paper with ideas about new values (maximum 1000 words) to the workshop organizers at the email address beyondcapital(a)openmailbox.org Important dates: Deadline for position paper submission (max 1000 words): May 22nd. Notification to authors: June 7th. Deadline for early registration to the conference: June 25th. --- Maurizio Teli, PhD Research Fellow Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science University of Trento, Italy phone: +39 335 6148320 skype: maurizio.teli

1 0