[JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure)
PS. Correction It's probably impossible to change links from frontpage as they are automatically generated However links to peer reviewed articles from the jopp 8 issue page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ ... should lead to issue 8 peer reviewed articles page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... ... which has the metadata NOT straight to the article page (same goes for links in release notice) Hope this makes sense cheers mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 13:14 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: Sophie Toupin, Ms.; [email protected] Subject: [JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure) Hi Peter, all I agree that it would be ideal to be able to access metadata from each article page. However as you say this would involve completely re-doing all of the peer reviewed articles link structure: a big job. Maybe if we raise money (as discussed occasionally) we could pay a web designer some hours to re-code on a test site? What do others think? IN THE MEANTIME: @Sophie, Shaowen and Lilly: congratulations on a really great issue. As said before, I am so sorry the release was delayed. But, now that it is up, we ned to tell the world. So, with that in mind, can you please advise: 1.do you have a short text to announce the JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue release? 2.what are your plans re JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue promotion: Vasilis has set up a pad (thanks) where email lists etc can be listed to avoid multiple posts and I have started to populate it: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists 3.finally, do you intend to modify the link structure as outlined below so that metadata (original subs, reviews, signals) are not bypassed from front page (or release announce)? cheers, Mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 17:05 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: [email protected]; Sophie Toupin, Ms. Subject: Re: [JoPP-Editorial] JoPP 8 link structure Disagree slightly: The structure of the issue is pretty similar to all the other issues (compare http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ and http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/) ... except that the titles ("Peer Reviewed Papers") are malformated and not linked (should be easy to fix). I think, now that we're on top of getting the site back live, that we should change the article pages so they include a link to the meta-data per article That would be much more straight forward and improve the journal as a whole, needs a bit of coding, though :( / Peter On 31 Mar 2016, at 03:48, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Second try cheers m ________________________________ From: Mathieu ONeil Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: JoPP 8 link structure Hi SSL All the peer reviewed article titles from the frontpage link straight to the html version of the article This bypasses the peer reviewed articles page where all the meta data (reviews etc) which makes us distinct are available So all peer reviewed article titles should point to the correct page : http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... Same thing for announcement cheers Mathieu _______________________________________________ JoPP-Editorial mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial
Hi all see attached screenshot (if it goes through on the mailing list, otherwise see here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharin... <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharing>) for a suggestion how to change the article pages to include meta-data, incl. reviewing process, abstract and keywords. If I don't hear strong negative voices over the coming 24 hours I'm going to implement this change and push it to production on Sunday This change would consequently *not* require the issue 8 team to implement the changes suggested by Mathieu (below). / Peter (PS. I am now working on getting the pdf feature back, but better)
On 1 Apr 2016, at 08:11, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
PS. Correction It's probably impossible to change links from frontpage as they are automatically generated However links to peer reviewed articles from the jopp 8 issue page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> ... should lead to issue 8 peer reviewed articles page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> ... which has the metadata NOT straight to the article page (same goes for links in release notice) Hope this makes sense cheers mathieu
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 13:14 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: Sophie Toupin, Ms.; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure)
Hi Peter, all
I agree that it would be ideal to be able to access metadata from each article page. However as you say this would involve completely re-doing all of the peer reviewed articles link structure: a big job. Maybe if we raise money (as discussed occasionally) we could pay a web designer some hours to re-code on a test site? What do others think?
IN THE MEANTIME:
@Sophie, Shaowen and Lilly: congratulations on a really great issue. As said before, I am so sorry the release was delayed. But, now that it is up, we ned to tell the world. So, with that in mind, can you please advise:
1.do you have a short text to announce the JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue release?
2.what are your plans re JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue promotion: Vasilis has set up a pad (thanks) where email lists etc can be listed to avoid multiple posts and I have started to populate it: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists <http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists>
3.finally, do you intend to modify the link structure as outlined below so that metadata (original subs, reviews, signals) are not bypassed from front page (or release announce)?
cheers,
Mathieu
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 17:05 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Sophie Toupin, Ms. Subject: Re: [JoPP-Editorial] JoPP 8 link structure
Disagree slightly:
The structure of the issue is pretty similar to all the other issues (compare http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> and http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/>) ... except that the titles ("Peer Reviewed Papers") are malformated and not linked (should be easy to fix).
I think, now that we're on top of getting the site back live, that we should change the article pages so they include a link to the meta-data per article
That would be much more straight forward and improve the journal as a whole, needs a bit of coding, though :(
/ Peter
On 31 Mar 2016, at 03:48, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Second try cheers m
From: Mathieu ONeil Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: JoPP 8 link structure
Hi SSL
All the peer reviewed article titles from the frontpage link straight to the html version of the article
This bypasses the peer reviewed articles page where all the meta data (reviews etc) which makes us distinct are available
So all peer reviewed article titles should point to the correct page :
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
Same thing for announcement
cheers
Mathieu
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Editorial mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
So, if I understand correctly. This is a sample of what user would see if they clicked on the specific link for the journal article from the Peer Production home site, but NOT from the special issue link. If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords? On Apr 1, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all see attached screenshot (if it goes through on the mailing list, otherwise see here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharin...) for a suggestion how to change the article pages to include meta-data, incl. reviewing process, abstract and keywords. If I don't hear strong negative voices over the coming 24 hours I'm going to implement this change and push it to production on Sunday This change would consequently *not* require the issue 8 team to implement the changes suggested by Mathieu (below). / Peter (PS. I am now working on getting the pdf feature back, but better) <Screen Shot 2016-04-01 at 14.21.17.png> On 1 Apr 2016, at 08:11, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: PS. Correction It's probably impossible to change links from frontpage as they are automatically generated However links to peer reviewed articles from the jopp 8 issue page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ ... should lead to issue 8 peer reviewed articles page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... ... which has the metadata NOT straight to the article page (same goes for links in release notice) Hope this makes sense cheers mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 13:14 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: Sophie Toupin, Ms.; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure) Hi Peter, all I agree that it would be ideal to be able to access metadata from each article page. However as you say this would involve completely re-doing all of the peer reviewed articles link structure: a big job. Maybe if we raise money (as discussed occasionally) we could pay a web designer some hours to re-code on a test site? What do others think? IN THE MEANTIME: @Sophie, Shaowen and Lilly: congratulations on a really great issue. As said before, I am so sorry the release was delayed. But, now that it is up, we ned to tell the world. So, with that in mind, can you please advise: 1.do you have a short text to announce the JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue release? 2.what are your plans re JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue promotion: Vasilis has set up a pad (thanks) where email lists etc can be listed to avoid multiple posts and I have started to populate it: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists 3.finally, do you intend to modify the link structure as outlined below so that metadata (original subs, reviews, signals) are not bypassed from front page (or release announce)? cheers, Mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 17:05 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Sophie Toupin, Ms. Subject: Re: [JoPP-Editorial] JoPP 8 link structure Disagree slightly: The structure of the issue is pretty similar to all the other issues (compare http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ and http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/) ... except that the titles ("Peer Reviewed Papers") are malformated and not linked (should be easy to fix). I think, now that we're on top of getting the site back live, that we should change the article pages so they include a link to the meta-data per article That would be much more straight forward and improve the journal as a whole, needs a bit of coding, though :( / Peter On 31 Mar 2016, at 03:48, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Second try cheers m ________________________________ From: Mathieu ONeil Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: JoPP 8 link structure Hi SSL All the peer reviewed article titles from the frontpage link straight to the html version of the article This bypasses the peer reviewed articles page where all the meta data (reviews etc) which makes us distinct are available So all peer reviewed article titles should point to the correct page : http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... Same thing for announcement cheers Mathieu _______________________________________________ JoPP-Editorial mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
On 1 Apr 2016, at 18:06, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]> wrote:
So, if I understand correctly. This is a sample of what user would see if they clicked on the specific link for the journal article from the Peer Production home site, but NOT from the special issue link.
yes
If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?
no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)
On Apr 1, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all
see attached screenshot (if it goes through on the mailing list, otherwise see here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharin... <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharing>)
for a suggestion how to change the article pages to include meta-data, incl. reviewing process, abstract and keywords.
If I don't hear strong negative voices over the coming 24 hours I'm going to implement this change and push it to production on Sunday
This change would consequently *not* require the issue 8 team to implement the changes suggested by Mathieu (below).
/ Peter
(PS. I am now working on getting the pdf feature back, but better)
<Screen Shot 2016-04-01 at 14.21.17.png>
On 1 Apr 2016, at 08:11, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
PS. Correction It's probably impossible to change links from frontpage as they are automatically generated However links to peer reviewed articles from the jopp 8 issue page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> ... should lead to issue 8 peer reviewed articles page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> ... which has the metadata NOT straight to the article page (same goes for links in release notice) Hope this makes sense cheers mathieu
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 13:14 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: Sophie Toupin, Ms.; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure)
Hi Peter, all
I agree that it would be ideal to be able to access metadata from each article page. However as you say this would involve completely re-doing all of the peer reviewed articles link structure: a big job. Maybe if we raise money (as discussed occasionally) we could pay a web designer some hours to re-code on a test site? What do others think?
IN THE MEANTIME:
@Sophie, Shaowen and Lilly: congratulations on a really great issue. As said before, I am so sorry the release was delayed. But, now that it is up, we ned to tell the world. So, with that in mind, can you please advise:
1.do you have a short text to announce the JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue release?
2.what are your plans re JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue promotion: Vasilis has set up a pad (thanks) where email lists etc can be listed to avoid multiple posts and I have started to populate it: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists <http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists>
3.finally, do you intend to modify the link structure as outlined below so that metadata (original subs, reviews, signals) are not bypassed from front page (or release announce)?
cheers,
Mathieu
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 17:05 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Sophie Toupin, Ms. Subject: Re: [JoPP-Editorial] JoPP 8 link structure
Disagree slightly:
The structure of the issue is pretty similar to all the other issues (compare http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> and http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/>) ... except that the titles ("Peer Reviewed Papers") are malformated and not linked (should be easy to fix).
I think, now that we're on top of getting the site back live, that we should change the article pages so they include a link to the meta-data per article
That would be much more straight forward and improve the journal as a whole, needs a bit of coding, though :(
/ Peter
On 31 Mar 2016, at 03:48, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Second try cheers m
From: Mathieu ONeil Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: JoPP 8 link structure
Hi SSL
All the peer reviewed article titles from the frontpage link straight to the html version of the article
This bypasses the peer reviewed articles page where all the meta data (reviews etc) which makes us distinct are available
So all peer reviewed article titles should point to the correct page :
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
Same thing for announcement
cheers
Mathieu
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Editorial mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hi Peter--- On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords? no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing) could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure. Thank you! -lilly
Lilly
On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Peter---
On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?
no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)
could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure.
These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-ar... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewe... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing
Thank you!
-lilly
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Also just to be clear, I realize that there are still some minor changes that need to be added to this, so this issue should not be live just yet. For one article, the authors submitted a final version which I haven’t verified with the other editors is indeed the one that is published to the site. Lilly On Apr 1, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Lilly On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Peter--- On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords? no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing) could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure. These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-revie... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-ar... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewe... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-revie... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing Thank you! -lilly _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
this is not exactly a message that we have been waiting for. we understood earlier that the issue was ready to go live -- which happened in the meantime so the only choice I have is to revert issue #8 to private and unpublish it--would have loved to know that a few weeks ago :( so I suggest you'd rather speed up getting your editorial team together to finalise the issue and give us a final sign when you're ready while doing that: could you please *remove* the title and abstracts from the article content as we'll be generating them automatically from metadata (still pondering about author-affiliation metadata) / Peter
On 4 Apr 2016, at 20:39, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]> wrote:
Also just to be clear, I realize that there are still some minor changes that need to be added to this, so this issue should not be live just yet. For one article, the authors submitted a final version which I haven’t verified with the other editors is indeed the one that is published to the site.
Lilly
On Apr 1, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Lilly
On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Peter---
On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?
no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)
could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure.
These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered:
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-ar... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewe... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing
Thank you!
-lilly
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Hi Peter, Lilly, all Yes the issue is live hence the need to announce the release officially (as suggested last week) before people start randomly linking to it Alternatively Peter could take it down? @Peter: are you implementing the metadata on each article mod? Currently metadata js not at all availabe cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 7:47 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Revised article page, proposal this is not exactly a message that we have been waiting for. we understood earlier that the issue was ready to go live -- which happened in the meantime so the only choice I have is to revert issue #8 to private and unpublish it--would have loved to know that a few weeks ago :( so I suggest you'd rather speed up getting your editorial team together to finalise the issue and give us a final sign when you're ready while doing that: could you please *remove* the title and abstracts from the article content as we'll be generating them automatically from metadata (still pondering about author-affiliation metadata) / Peter On 4 Apr 2016, at 20:39, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Also just to be clear, I realize that there are still some minor changes that need to be added to this, so this issue should not be live just yet. For one article, the authors submitted a final version which I haven't verified with the other editors is indeed the one that is published to the site. Lilly On Apr 1, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Lilly On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Peter--- On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords? no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing) could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure. These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-revie... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-ar... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewe... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-revie... http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing Thank you! -lilly _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
On 5 Apr 2016, at 07:18, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Peter, Lilly, all
Yes the issue is live hence the need to announce the release officially (as suggested last week) before people start randomly linking to it
Alternatively Peter could take it down?
I have unpublished it as there are issues with formatting and footnotes in one article
@Peter: are you implementing the metadata on each article mod? Currently metadata js not at all availabe
the page with the metadata will be available here from the homepage and from here: http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/?page_id=4970&preview=true <http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/?page_id=4970&preview=true> I'll probably do the metadata mod on the editing-suite tomorrow morning and publish to production when tested (probably need to pay some attention to those articles that repeat abstract and keywords at the beginnin (as in issue 8)
cheers
Mathieu
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 7:47 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Revised article page, proposal
this is not exactly a message that we have been waiting for.
we understood earlier that the issue was ready to go live -- which happened in the meantime
so the only choice I have is to revert issue #8 to private and unpublish it--would have loved to know that a few weeks ago :(
so I suggest you'd rather speed up getting your editorial team together to finalise the issue and give us a final sign when you're ready
while doing that: could you please *remove* the title and abstracts from the article content as we'll be generating them automatically from metadata (still pondering about author-affiliation metadata)
/ Peter
On 4 Apr 2016, at 20:39, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Also just to be clear, I realize that there are still some minor changes that need to be added to this, so this issue should not be live just yet. For one article, the authors submitted a final version which I haven’t verified with the other editors is indeed the one that is published to the site.
Lilly
On Apr 1, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Lilly
On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Peter---
On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?
no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)
could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure.
These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered:
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-ar... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewe... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing
Thank you!
-lilly
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
participants (3)
-
Dr. Peter Troxler -
Mathieu ONeil -
Nguyen, Lilly