this is not exactly a message that we have been waiting for. we understood earlier that the issue was ready to go live -- which happened in the meantime so the only choice I have is to revert issue #8 to private and unpublish it--would have loved to know that a few weeks ago :( so I suggest you'd rather speed up getting your editorial team together to finalise the issue and give us a final sign when you're ready while doing that: could you please *remove* the title and abstracts from the article content as we'll be generating them automatically from metadata (still pondering about author-affiliation metadata) / Peter
On 4 Apr 2016, at 20:39, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected]> wrote:
Also just to be clear, I realize that there are still some minor changes that need to be added to this, so this issue should not be live just yet. For one article, the authors submitted a final version which I haven’t verified with the other editors is indeed the one that is published to the site.
Lilly
On Apr 1, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Lilly
On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Peter---
On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?
no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)
could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure.
These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered:
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-1/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-ar... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewe... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-6-disruption-and-the-law/peer-reviewed-articles/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-7-policies-for-the-commons/peer-reviewed-papers/> http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing
Thank you!
-lilly
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public