Also just to be clear, I realize that there are still some minor changes that need to be added to this, so this issue should not be live just yet. For one article, the authors submitted a final version which I haven’t verified with the other editors is indeed the one that is published to the site. 

Lilly


On Apr 1, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <trox@fabfolk.com> wrote:

Lilly

On 1 Apr 2016, at 21:07, Nguyen, Lilly <lillyng@email.unc.edu> wrote:

Hi Peter---
On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Dr. Peter Troxler <trox@fabfolk.com> wrote:

If so, where do the data for the absract and keywords live? Right now, we have those buried within the body of the journal article text, so if you implement this, we would have to go back and edit out all of the abstracts and keywords?

no editing needed if the metadata has been entered correctly (which has been done for most issues, for #3 and #6 some signals/signal numbers are missing)

could you verify this? i have no way of knowing and just want to make sure.

These are the "peer reviewed articles" pages per issue that show all the metadata that are entered:


you quickly see that the majority of issues are fine (including #8) -- except #3 and #6 where signal figure are missing



Thank you!

-lilly


_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public



_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public