Hi all see attached screenshot (if it goes through on the mailing list, otherwise see here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharin... <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9V728tkrIGQaGlTc2g5bThINnM/view?usp=sharing>) for a suggestion how to change the article pages to include meta-data, incl. reviewing process, abstract and keywords. If I don't hear strong negative voices over the coming 24 hours I'm going to implement this change and push it to production on Sunday This change would consequently *not* require the issue 8 team to implement the changes suggested by Mathieu (below). / Peter (PS. I am now working on getting the pdf feature back, but better)
On 1 Apr 2016, at 08:11, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
PS. Correction It's probably impossible to change links from frontpage as they are automatically generated However links to peer reviewed articles from the jopp 8 issue page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> ... should lead to issue 8 peer reviewed articles page http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/> ... which has the metadata NOT straight to the article page (same goes for links in release notice) Hope this makes sense cheers mathieu
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 13:14 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: Sophie Toupin, Ms.; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [JoPP-Editorial] Feminism and (un)hacking links & release (was: Re: JoPP 8 link structure)
Hi Peter, all
I agree that it would be ideal to be able to access metadata from each article page. However as you say this would involve completely re-doing all of the peer reviewed articles link structure: a big job. Maybe if we raise money (as discussed occasionally) we could pay a web designer some hours to re-code on a test site? What do others think?
IN THE MEANTIME:
@Sophie, Shaowen and Lilly: congratulations on a really great issue. As said before, I am so sorry the release was delayed. But, now that it is up, we ned to tell the world. So, with that in mind, can you please advise:
1.do you have a short text to announce the JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue release?
2.what are your plans re JoPP feminism and (un)hacking issue promotion: Vasilis has set up a pad (thanks) where email lists etc can be listed to avoid multiple posts and I have started to populate it: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists <http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_Lists>
3.finally, do you intend to modify the link structure as outlined below so that metadata (original subs, reviews, signals) are not bypassed from front page (or release announce)?
cheers,
Mathieu
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Dr. Peter Troxler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 17:05 To: Journal of Peer Production's Editorial team list Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Sophie Toupin, Ms. Subject: Re: [JoPP-Editorial] JoPP 8 link structure
Disagree slightly:
The structure of the issue is pretty similar to all the other issues (compare http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/> and http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/ <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-0/>) ... except that the titles ("Peer Reviewed Papers") are malformated and not linked (should be easy to fix).
I think, now that we're on top of getting the site back live, that we should change the article pages so they include a link to the meta-data per article
That would be much more straight forward and improve the journal as a whole, needs a bit of coding, though :(
/ Peter
On 31 Mar 2016, at 03:48, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Second try cheers m
From: Mathieu ONeil Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:13 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: JoPP 8 link structure
Hi SSL
All the peer reviewed article titles from the frontpage link straight to the html version of the article
This bypasses the peer reviewed articles page where all the meta data (reviews etc) which makes us distinct are available
So all peer reviewed article titles should point to the correct page :
http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-revie... <http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking-2/peer-reviewed-papers/>
Same thing for announcement
cheers
Mathieu
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Editorial mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-editorial>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
