[P2P-F] Fwd: is there no p2p spirituality because there is no spirituality (heron discussion)

[Poor Richard]

On 9/12/2011 4:42 AM, Michel Bauwens wrote:
> hi richard, I'm cc'ing John, in case he's interested in contributing
>
> just one remark, how can you equate rotating positions, with a
> priestly cast, i.e.
>
> <The priestly class is diluted but still essential?>
>
> For me this is a denial that any person can offer contributions based
> on special knowledge or experience, and violates the principle of
> equipotentiality,
>
> michel
>

Yeh, my somewhat snide comment missed the side of the barn by a mile. My
response to "The Guru question" clarifies my view that we can all be
teachers. Again, it is the "spiritual" angle that skews my
interpretation. I have re-appropriated the guru into the secular domain
of bio-cognitive development, which refers to a holistic, in-person
practice (essentially p2p) for two or more people that focuses not on
learning /facts/ but developing bio-cognitive skills and abilities
(bio-cognitive = body & brain).

PR
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110912/a260f8ec/attachment.htm