[P2P-F] Fwd: Danger and Opportunity
Dante-Gabryell Monson
dante.monson at gmail.com
Tue Nov 15 21:18:51 CET 2011
note : I am not stating anywhere in my reply that I deem viable or useful
to partake any nuclear energy options. I do notice, since the nuclear
topic has been raised, that there are different approaches, and different
resources for such, used for various reasons ( often power/control related
? )
Personally, I see nuclear approaches as centralized approaches.
Oil, gas and coal also potentially leading to centralized approaches of
control.
I prefer small scale and networked distributed approaches to energy
production, preferably renewable energy ( or geothermal some claiming
geothermal is not a renewable source ).
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Mark Janssen <dreamingforward at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Dante-Gabryell Monson
> <dante.monson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems there are a few ways and materials that can be used for
> producing
> > fission nuclear energy ( as opposed to fusion - for which
> > a controversial experimental iter fusion reactor is being built in
> france -
> > ).
>
> All that misses the point: the 1st Law of Thermodynamics and the rate
> of consumption implied by prior history.
>
> marcos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111115/cb6d02fb/attachment.htm
More information about the P2P-Foundation
mailing list