note : I am not stating anywhere in my reply that I deem viable or useful to partake any nuclear energy options. 狢 do notice, since the nuclear topic has been raised, that there are different approaches, and different resources for such, used for various reasons ( often power/control related ? )<div>
<br></div><div>Personally, I see nuclear approaches as centralized approaches.</div><div>Oil, gas and coal also potentially leading to centralized approaches of control.</div><div><br></div><div>I prefer small scale and networked distributed approaches to energy production, preferably renewable energy ( or geothermal some claiming geothermal is not a renewable source ).</div>
<div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Mark Janssen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dreamingforward@gmail.com">dreamingforward@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Dante-Gabryell Monson<br>
<<a href="mailto:dante.monson@gmail.com">dante.monson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> It seems there are a few ways and materials that can be used for producing<br>
> fission nuclear energy ( as opposed to fusion - for which<br>
> a蠏ontroversial猬xperimental犲ter fusion reactor犲s being built in france -<br>
> ).<br>
<br>
</div>All that misses the point: 慯he 1st Law of Thermodynamics and the rate<br>
of consumption implied by prior history.<br>
<br>
marcos<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>