[P2P-F] self-regulating markets

Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis xekoukou at gmail.com
Wed Jun 22 13:33:47 CEST 2011


I tried to find information about mutual credit clearing Unions. I couldnt
find much, so I guess that the name itself explains it. I suppose that LETS
is such a system.

Let me make an example so as to see if we are talking about the same method
of exchange and to clarify things.

We have John, Michael and all the others. John is making furniture. In fact
he has 5 different kind of furniture that he is making. Michael is a
software engineer, he is paid by the hour and has expertise in a number of
programming languages and frameworks. Both of them had done previous work
and they have a reputation that distinguishes them from other of the same
work.

John decided that he wants to have a site advertising his furniture so he
goes to Michael and tells him to make him a site. Michael and John make a
contract. Michael through the (system)site knows  at which proportionality
has john currency, ie furnitute been exchanged with other currencies,
products even if that exchange is indirect. The system transforms to him
through past transactions or future contracts the currency of furniture into
the products he wants. This way Michael has an exact understanding of the
pleasure he recieves at a specific time vs the work he will have to do now.

John on the other hand understands the amount of 'happiness he will receive'
, ie the product. There is no need for such a transformation.

Both now have enough information to start trading, decide the amount of work
each one will be obliged to do and at what time.

Lets just say now that Michael now has a contract with John that allows him
to ask for a specific number of furniture of a specific design till a
specific date. That means that after this date John has no obligation to
make these furniture. He has no debt and he is free to abandon his workshop,
retire.
Till that date Michael has to find work for John so as to transform his
currency into another he likes. The system told him that most likely he will
transform it into the products he likes but it is up to him.

Let us say that someone likes the furniture of john and wants to trade. At
this time he can trade directly with John or with Michael.

As you can see if John decides to abandon his obligations the one to be
harmed will be Michael. This system doesnt have an abstract sense of money.
It tries to transform the currencies into currencies that we want.

How much value do 500 dollars mean to you?  500 dollars have different value
per person depending on the things they can buy with them. After a period of
time you will still have 500 dollars but the things you can buy are
different because the prices change. Not only that, the person or node that
has the money plays an important role on the value of money. Big
corporations buy stock with a lower price than smaller ones. Their value of
money is different.

*The topology of the graph plays an important role in the transformation of
money into goods. *

So Dollars or any kind of such a currency, like gold, doesnt contain within
it the pleasure, happiness we will receive with those money.

Now If someone were to give us how happy he would be if he were in a
specific situation( number of products, amount of work), if everyone did
that, I could take all those people and organize them in such a way,
automatically creating circles of flows, automatically finding the prices
and amount of products that are to be traded. If I am given enough
information, I could even tell an engineer how his invention will change the
flow of products and prices.
I havent made the insertion of data user friendly yet, but I think that It
takes all parameters into account and the price is determined in such a way
so as that the individual maximizes his gain. You must also understand that
noone can cheat. If someone says something different from what he wants , he
will get worse results.

Savings equal the amount of money on negative balances. There are methods to
stop people from not paying and this should be enforced globally. If someone
has a flow of products every day, if he doesnt want to pay old debts, he
could be dropped out of the system, not be able to buy new things. Other
people could also insure someones debt.

As old debts are transformed into new debts by making new contracts, savings
change position from one person to another as debt changes hands. You can
undestand that those who will have debt will be the ones that are thought as
the most productive and usefull in the future. Another method for savings
allocation is proportionality of your savings to the goods you will want in
the future.

What I am saying here IS experimental. What is sure though is the fact that
it requires a lot of information to make it work.

Best regards...

2011/6/22 Thomas Greco <thg at mindspring.com>

> **
> Dear Apostolis,
>
> Below are the links to my websites, and the title of my latest book.
>
> Clearing circles have been operating successfully for many years. It is an
> old idea.
> Now, the challenge is to optimize the procedures and protocols and take it
> to scale, then network local exchanges together to provide an means of
> payment that is locally controlled but globally useful.
>
> A debit balance in a credit clearing exchange can be looked at as a loan.
> It is a draft upon a line of credit that is extended by the collective
> membership. In a clearing system some accounts must be allowed to be
> negative. The total of negative balances (or positive balances) can be
> looked at as the supply of internal currency.
>
> Savings and investment, or *finance *is a separate function from *exchange
> *.
> Yes, they are related, but require different mechanisms.
>
> Thomas
>
> Thomas H. Greco, Jr.thg at mindspring.com
> Mobile phone (USA): 520-820-0575
> Beyond Money: http://beyondmoney.net
> Tom's News and Views: http://tomazgreco.wordpress.com
> Archive Website: http://www.Reinventingmoney.com
> Photo gallery: http://picasaweb.google.com/tomazhg
> Skype/Twitter name: tomazgreco
> My latest book, "The End of Money and the Future of Civilization"
> can be ordered from Chelsea Green Publishing, Amazon.com, or your local bookshop.
>
>
> On 06/21/2011 7:35 PM, Michel Bauwens wrote:
>
> Thomas has written a few books and is in touch with many local credit
> commons initiatives ...
>
> he's in cc,
>
> Michel
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <
> xekoukou at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What you say was exactly the idea with which I started working.
>>
>>  Where is more info about it? Has Thomas created such a clearing house?
>> Most importantly, has he found an algorithm to create trading circles? has
>> he studied the macroeconomy of such a system?
>>
>>  Why do we need to see the global network?
>>
>>  Well, in order to be able to make investments. New investments about a
>> specific product can have indirect consequences to the whole network. We may
>> then have to compute what percentage of the investment will have to be paid
>> by each peer.
>>
>>  We need to know about the global network in order to decide to which
>> persons we can store our savings and the ability of those currencies to be
>> transfered into goods that we will want in the future.
>>
>>  It is important to think of each peer as a producer, a seller, an
>> investor. Investors need information.
>>
>>
>>    2011/6/21 Kevin Carson <free.market.anticapitalist at gmail.com>
>>
>>> El 21/06/11 04:23, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis dijo:
>>>
>>>  > What I am about to say needs testing and more thinking but let me
>>> tell you
>>> > what I have done so far to create an alternative to the free market.
>>>
>>>  We're probably using the term "free market" in a different sense.  The
>>> market can refer simply to the cash nexus, or the arena of commodity
>>> production for monetized exchange.
>>>
>>> But it can also be used, by market anarchist like me, to describe the
>>> entire spectrum of voluntary transactions and relationships --
>>> including cooperatives, gift economies, communal property, informal
>>> barter, mutual aid, etc.
>>>
>>> >>  I have created a new class of currencies that are very similar to the
>>> >> very
>>> >>  old currencies. What if each person used the creation of his work as
>>> >>  currency. When someone owns 5 paul's chairs for example , It is meant
>>> >> that
>>> >>  Paul will have to give him those 5 chairs in the future if he asks
>>> for
>>> >> them.
>>> >>  This is then some kind of loan. Someone gives something now in
>>> exchange
>>> >> for
>>> >>  something in the future. If he doesnt need the chairs, he might have
>>> to
>>> >>  exchange Paul's chairs with something else.
>>>
>>>  That sounds a lot like Tom Greco's mutual credit clearing networks,
>>> which I'm a big fan of.  Every member runs a balance that looks a lot
>>> like the balance in a checking account.  When you sell a good or
>>> service to a member your balance goes up, and when you purchase same
>>> it goes down.  And the system allows people to run negative balances,
>>> so long as the negative balance is limited to some value relative to
>>> their average monthly sales and the account continues to be active and
>>> turn over.  So "money" is essentially backed by the goods being
>>> traded; rather than being a store of value from past production, it is
>>> simply a unit of account for denominating trade of present-for-present
>>> or present-for-future production.  Nobody has to have a store of money
>>> from past production in order to trade, so there's no problem of
>>> economic stagnation for want of liquidity ("there's not enough money
>>> in circulation").  People create money by trading.
>>>
>>> --
>>>  Kevin Carson
>>> Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org
>>> Mutualist Blog:  Free Market Anti-Capitalism
>>> http://mutualist.blogspot.com
>>> The Homebrew Industrial Revolution:  A Low-Overhead Manifesto
>>> http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com
>>> Organization Theory:  A Libertarian Perspective
>>> http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/12/studies-in-anarchist-theory-of.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>>
>>      Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 


Sincerely yours,

     Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110622/fc15a07e/attachment.htm 


More information about the P2P-Foundation mailing list