[P2P-F] self-regulating markets
Thomas Greco
thg at mindspring.com
Thu Jun 23 06:48:11 CEST 2011
It's not all that complicated.
Yes, LETS is a form of mutual credit clearing.
Credit clearing simply allows us to use "our" money (that we create in
the process of buying/selling) instead of "their" money, which must be
borrowed from a bank or earned from someone else who borrowed it from a
bank.
If I do some work for you, we must agree upon a price. Your account is
debited and my account is credited for the same amount. I can then use
my credits to buy whatever I want, at an agreed price, from someone else
in the system. You must eventually provide value to someone in order to
bring your balance back to zero. If you default, the collective
membership bears the burden of that instead of me personally suffering
the loss.
The system must have sufficient revenues to cover such losses as well as
its operating expenses.
I've explained all of this many times in my writings.
Thomas H. Greco, Jr.
thg at mindspring.com
Mobile phone (USA): 520-820-0575
Beyond Money: http://beyondmoney.net
Tom's News and Views: http://tomazgreco.wordpress.com
Archive Website: http://www.Reinventingmoney.com
Photo gallery: http://picasaweb.google.com/tomazhg
Skype/Twitter name: tomazgreco
My latest book, "The End of Money and the Future of Civilization"
can be ordered from Chelsea Green Publishing, Amazon.com, or your local bookshop.
On 06/22/2011 4:33 AM, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
> I tried to find information about mutual credit clearing Unions. I
> couldnt find much, so I guess that the name itself explains it. I
> suppose that LETS is such a system.
>
> Let me make an example so as to see if we are talking about the same
> method of exchange and to clarify things.
>
> We have John, Michael and all the others. John is making furniture. In
> fact he has 5 different kind of furniture that he is making. Michael
> is a software engineer, he is paid by the hour and has expertise in a
> number of programming languages and frameworks. Both of them had done
> previous work and they have a reputation that distinguishes them from
> other of the same work.
>
> John decided that he wants to have a site advertising his furniture so
> he goes to Michael and tells him to make him a site. Michael and John
> make a contract. Michael through the (system)site knows at which
> proportionality has john currency, ie furnitute been exchanged with
> other currencies, products even if that exchange is indirect. The
> system transforms to him through past transactions or future contracts
> the currency of furniture into the products he wants. This way Michael
> has an exact understanding of the pleasure he recieves at a specific
> time vs the work he will have to do now.
>
> John on the other hand understands the amount of 'happiness he will
> receive' , ie the product. There is no need for such a transformation.
>
> Both now have enough information to start trading, decide the amount
> of work each one will be obliged to do and at what time.
>
> Lets just say now that Michael now has a contract with John that
> allows him to ask for a specific number of furniture of a specific
> design till a specific date. That means that after this date John has
> no obligation to make these furniture. He has no debt and he is free
> to abandon his workshop, retire.
> Till that date Michael has to find work for John so as to transform
> his currency into another he likes. The system told him that most
> likely he will transform it into the products he likes but it is up to
> him.
>
> Let us say that someone likes the furniture of john and wants to
> trade. At this time he can trade directly with John or with Michael.
>
> As you can see if John decides to abandon his obligations the one to
> be harmed will be Michael. This system doesnt have an abstract sense
> of money. It tries to transform the currencies into currencies that we
> want.
>
> How much value do 500 dollars mean to you? 500 dollars have different
> value per person depending on the things they can buy with them. After
> a period of time you will still have 500 dollars but the things you
> can buy are different because the prices change. Not only that, the
> person or node that has the money plays an important role on the value
> of money. Big corporations buy stock with a lower price than smaller
> ones. Their value of money is different.
>
> *The topology of the graph plays an important role in the
> transformation of money into goods. *
>
> So Dollars or any kind of such a currency, like gold, doesnt contain
> within it the pleasure, happiness we will receive with those money.
>
> Now If someone were to give us how happy he would be if he were in a
> specific situation( number of products, amount of work), if everyone
> did that, I could take all those people and organize them in such a
> way, automatically creating circles of flows, automatically finding
> the prices and amount of products that are to be traded. If I am given
> enough information, I could even tell an engineer how his invention
> will change the flow of products and prices.
> I havent made the insertion of data user friendly yet, but I think
> that It takes all parameters into account and the price is determined
> in such a way so as that the individual maximizes his gain. You must
> also understand that noone can cheat. If someone says something
> different from what he wants , he will get worse results.
>
> Savings equal the amount of money on negative balances. There are
> methods to stop people from not paying and this should be enforced
> globally. If someone has a flow of products every day, if he doesnt
> want to pay old debts, he could be dropped out of the system, not be
> able to buy new things. Other people could also insure someones debt.
>
> As old debts are transformed into new debts by making new contracts,
> savings change position from one person to another as debt changes
> hands. You can undestand that those who will have debt will be the
> ones that are thought as the most productive and usefull in the
> future. Another method for savings allocation is proportionality of
> your savings to the goods you will want in the future.
>
> What I am saying here IS experimental. What is sure though is the fact
> that it requires a lot of information to make it work.
>
> Best regards...
>
> 2011/6/22 Thomas Greco <thg at mindspring.com <mailto:thg at mindspring.com>>
>
> Dear Apostolis,
>
> Below are the links to my websites, and the title of my latest book.
>
> Clearing circles have been operating successfully for many years.
> It is an old idea.
> Now, the challenge is to optimize the procedures and protocols and
> take it to scale, then network local exchanges together to provide
> an means of payment that is locally controlled but globally useful.
>
> A debit balance in a credit clearing exchange can be looked at as
> a loan. It is a draft upon a line of credit that is extended by
> the collective membership. In a clearing system some accounts must
> be allowed to be negative. The total of negative balances (or
> positive balances) can be looked at as the supply of internal
> currency.
>
> Savings and investment, or *finance *is a separate function from
> *exchange*.
> Yes, they are related, but require different mechanisms.
>
> Thomas
>
> Thomas H. Greco, Jr.
> thg at mindspring.com <mailto:thg at mindspring.com>
> Mobile phone (USA): 520-820-0575
> Beyond Money:http://beyondmoney.net
> Tom's News and Views:http://tomazgreco.wordpress.com
> Archive Website:http://www.Reinventingmoney.com
> Photo gallery:http://picasaweb.google.com/tomazhg
> Skype/Twitter name: tomazgreco
> My latest book, "The End of Money and the Future of Civilization"
> can be ordered from Chelsea Green Publishing, Amazon.com, or your local bookshop.
>
>
> On 06/21/2011 7:35 PM, Michel Bauwens wrote:
>> Thomas has written a few books and is in touch with many local
>> credit commons initiatives ...
>>
>> he's in cc,
>>
>> Michel
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>> <xekoukou at gmail.com <mailto:xekoukou at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> What you say was exactly the idea with which I started working.
>>
>> Where is more info about it? Has Thomas created such a
>> clearing house?
>> Most importantly, has he found an algorithm to create trading
>> circles? has he studied the macroeconomy of such a system?
>>
>> Why do we need to see the global network?
>>
>> Well, in order to be able to make investments. New
>> investments about a specific product can have indirect
>> consequences to the whole network. We may then have to
>> compute what percentage of the investment will have to be
>> paid by each peer.
>>
>> We need to know about the global network in order to decide
>> to which persons we can store our savings and the ability of
>> those currencies to be transfered into goods that we will
>> want in the future.
>>
>> It is important to think of each peer as a producer, a
>> seller, an investor. Investors need information.
>>
>>
>> 2011/6/21 Kevin Carson <free.market.anticapitalist at gmail.com
>> <mailto:free.market.anticapitalist at gmail.com>>
>>
>> El 21/06/11 04:23, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis dijo:
>>
>> > What I am about to say needs testing and more thinking
>> but let me tell you
>> > what I have done so far to create an alternative to the
>> free market.
>>
>> We're probably using the term "free market" in a
>> different sense. The
>> market can refer simply to the cash nexus, or the arena
>> of commodity
>> production for monetized exchange.
>>
>> But it can also be used, by market anarchist like me, to
>> describe the
>> entire spectrum of voluntary transactions and
>> relationships --
>> including cooperatives, gift economies, communal
>> property, informal
>> barter, mutual aid, etc.
>>
>> >> I have created a new class of currencies that are
>> very similar to the
>> >> very
>> >> old currencies. What if each person used the creation
>> of his work as
>> >> currency. When someone owns 5 paul's chairs for
>> example , It is meant
>> >> that
>> >> Paul will have to give him those 5 chairs in the
>> future if he asks for
>> >> them.
>> >> This is then some kind of loan. Someone gives
>> something now in exchange
>> >> for
>> >> something in the future. If he doesnt need the
>> chairs, he might have to
>> >> exchange Paul's chairs with something else.
>>
>> That sounds a lot like Tom Greco's mutual credit clearing
>> networks,
>> which I'm a big fan of. Every member runs a balance that
>> looks a lot
>> like the balance in a checking account. When you sell a
>> good or
>> service to a member your balance goes up, and when you
>> purchase same
>> it goes down. And the system allows people to run
>> negative balances,
>> so long as the negative balance is limited to some value
>> relative to
>> their average monthly sales and the account continues to
>> be active and
>> turn over. So "money" is essentially backed by the goods
>> being
>> traded; rather than being a store of value from past
>> production, it is
>> simply a unit of account for denominating trade of
>> present-for-present
>> or present-for-future production. Nobody has to have a
>> store of money
>> from past production in order to trade, so there's no
>> problem of
>> economic stagnation for want of liquidity ("there's not
>> enough money
>> in circulation"). People create money by trading.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Carson
>> Center for a Stateless Society http://c4ss.org
>> Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism
>> http://mutualist.blogspot.com
>> The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto
>> http://homebrewindustrialrevolution.wordpress.com
>> Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective
>> http://mutualist.blogspot.com/2005/12/studies-in-anarchist-theory-of.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>>
>> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net -
>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>
>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>
>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens;
>> http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens;
>> http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110622/498feaf1/attachment.htm
More information about the P2P-Foundation
mailing list