[P2P-F] weak vs strong ties as wrong dilemma

• Previous message: [P2P-F] weak vs strong ties as wrong dilemma
• Next message: [P2P-F] weak vs strong ties as wrong dilemma
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This network connects to cleveland...   did ohio get anything in the NTI A Btop grants?

The slide dec looks like they will allow a mixture of commercial and schools and libraries to connect.  This is the so called internet 2 community anchor institution network

I'd like to see a national public optical internet connect p2p and home3 brew etc etc

This stuff is just beginning.  It looks promising.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen shot 2011-02-04 at 12.23.13 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 506585 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110204/bcffe374/attachment.png 
-------------- next part --------------



http://www.usucan.org/

The United States Unified Community Anchor Network (U.S. UCAN) is a new national project dedicated to connecting community anchor institutions, including public libraries, schools, community colleges, research parks, public safety and health care institutions with advanced broadband capabilities. Utilizing the Internet2 Network and in collaboration with regional research and education networks across the country, U.S. UCAN will enable these anchor institutions to serve their communities with telemedicine, distance learning and other life-changing applications not possible with commercially available Internet services.


U.S. UCAN is being established under the auspices of a federal stimulus grant to Internet2 from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP). Internet2 is a non-profit organization that has provided high-capacity, high-performance networking for the U.S. research and higher education community since 1996. The BTOP grant enables Internet2 to dramatically increase its bandwidth and footprint to accommodate the connection of the nation's estimated 200,000 community anchor institutions, unlocking for the citizens they serve next-generation Internet-based applications that promise to provide a whole range of new possibilities?and new economic opportunities.

U.S. UCAN will ensure that all the necessary bridges are built to connect the various community anchor sectors and provide programs tailored to their needs and their public.

See About U.S. UCAN for more details.


On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:44 PM, Samuel Rose wrote:

> Michel, I really agree. As I said sometime last month, I hope that
> P2PF might become some form of political movement here in the
> industrial midwest that can be taken seriously (as opposed to
> progressive groups that are dismissed and marginalised, and
> neo-liberal politics that basically puts political activity in service
> of big corporations).
> 
> Transition movement is a great example. I've talked here locally and
> in Cleveland about the idea of a P2P political network (*not* "party")
> and there is definitely interest. The idea is that P2P politics is
> part of the whole of existence, not a division of human activity. We
> can decide together anywhere, at any time, to do anything within our
> abilities to do it. More transitionally and closer to existing
> bureaucracies, we can also start using tools and system like "shadow
> government" to start keeping track and feedback loops of what is
> happening.
> 
> Over in Wisconsin, Sheldon Rampton and Co.have also made some serious
> progress in coordinated social transparency with
> http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=SourceWatch and nearer to
> home http://arborwiki.org is an example of a way for people to engage
> based on the place that they are in. The global network that is P2PF
> is a missing component that I see that could aid in bridging the gaps
> in global/local organizing (realizing of course that there would be
> much work and building to be done to make that happen).
> 
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi Sam,
>> 
>> I agree, with the geo-local focus, but it is not enough, we also need
>> globa-local forms of popular organisation ... I think the transition
>> movement is exemplary in that regard, combining strong local focus with a
>> global movement
>> 
>> Michel
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Samuel Rose <samuel.rose at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
>>> <dennis.hamilton at acm.org> wrote:
>>>> I am fascinated by the current explorations concerning social media and
>>>> how community formation and spontaneity are enabled.  I find a great deal to
>>>> digest, and much thoughtful analysis in the recent threads.
>>>> 
>>>> Although it is not material to the clarification of weak and strong ties
>>>> as a false dichotomy, this one passage brought me up short:
>>>> 
>>>> " ...what is destroying our opportunities for individuality and
>>>> creativity, subverting us from realizing our human potential is not that we
>>>> are tweeting about trivialities, but that the governance of our planet has
>>>> been taken away from us."
>>>> 
>>>> The hyperbole is appealing, but I wonder if there is something more
>>>> important here.  When, if ever, have "we" possessed the governance of our
>>>> planet?  Indeed, what can it possibly mean to give ontological standing to
>>>> the notion of planetary governance and suggest that it has ever existed?
>>>> 
>>>> I ask this because is it perhaps more the case that we have before us
>>>> the opportunity to gain something, not that we ever lost it.
>>>> 
>>>>  - Dennis
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I see you  point and it is a good one.
>>> 
>>> There are some ways in which we lost at least some freedom over our
>>> environments over time as the industrial revolution emerged. I can
>>> think of the example of a farmer in Canada, who's ancestors came to
>>> Canada generations ago to seek freedom from tyranny in Europe, and who
>>> is now subject to legal system manipulations from companies like
>>> Monsanto that threaten to take away his livelihood and force him to
>>> buy and use products he never wanted to use in his operations (because
>>> their patented strains of corn contaminated his and Monsanto came out
>>> and discovered this)
>>> 
>>> For me, the meat of the article is the idea that weak ties and strong
>>> ties is the wrong dilemma to focus on. I think this is true. I think
>>> we need ties that are geo-physical local *and* "network" local (people
>>> around the world that have any degree of connection with you that you
>>> at least become aware of them). Fracturing and isolation weaken the
>>> value people can get out of all of their connections.
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: p2p-foundation-bounces at lists.ourproject.org
>>>> [mailto:p2p-foundation-bounces at lists.ourproject.org] On Behalf Of Michel
>>>> Bauwens
>>>> 
>>>> <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/2011-February/000401.html>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 07:01
>>>> To: p2p-foundation
>>>> Subject: [P2P-F] weak vs strong ties as wrong dilemma
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  -
>>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>>> 
>>>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>>>> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>>> 
>>>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
>>>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>>>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>>>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Sam Rose
>>> Future Forward Institute and Forward Foundation
>>> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552
>>> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451
>>> skype: samuelrose
>>> email: samuel.rose at gmail.com
>>> http://forwardfound.org
>>> http://futureforwardinstitute.org
>>> http://hollymeadcapital.com
>>> http://p2pfoundation.net
>>> http://socialmediaclassroom.com
>>> 
>>> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human
>>> ambition." - Carl Sagan
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>> 
>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>> 
>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
>> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
>> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Sam Rose
> Future Forward Institute and Forward Foundation
> Tel:+1(517) 639-1552
> Cel: +1-(517)-974-6451
> skype: samuelrose
> email: samuel.rose at gmail.com
> http://forwardfound.org
> http://futureforwardinstitute.org
> http://hollymeadcapital.com
> http://p2pfoundation.net
> http://socialmediaclassroom.com
> 
> "The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human
> ambition." - Carl Sagan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
> 

• Previous message: [P2P-F] weak vs strong ties as wrong dilemma
• Next message: [P2P-F] weak vs strong ties as wrong dilemma
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]