[P2P-F] Infinite Growth is Goal when Profit is Treated as Reward

Sat Dec 10 02:34:39 CET 2011

I was refering to the dynamic case when I said that.

When you take a house with a loan, you are the owner of the house.

2011/12/10 Patrick Anderson <agnucius at gmail.com>

> Apostolis wrote:
> > in both cases i presented, consumers have ownership
> > of the company from the beginning till the end.
>
> That is what I intend too, but only covers the 'static' case
> where the scale of production is exactly the amount
> needed to supply the consumer/owners with the Products
> they need.
>
> Whenever there is Surplus, we will probably want to sell
> that extra Product to some consumers who do not yet
> have ownership.  In that case, those latecomers will
> likely pay Price above Cost (Profit), and so we can use
> that overpayment as though they were investing - so that
> even those latecomers will gain co-ownership and cause
> them to move toward case #1 as well.
>
> Treating Profit as Payer Investment will 'stablize' the
> growth of that entity - causing growth to approach zero
> as each Payer/Consumer becomes a co-owner, and
> thereby stops paying Profit.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> This is very important for an accurate simulation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>

-- 

Sincerely yours,

     Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111210/32e9ee1a/attachment.htm 