[JoPP-Public] JoPP special issue on policy-making for a commons-based society

[george dafermos]

Hi Mathieu, hi all,

First of all, I'd like to thank all list members who responded to our call
for reviewers. We will contact you over the coming weeks (off-list) to
coordinate the review process.

As for your questions, see inline.



On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au>
wrote:

> [...]
>
> So your issue could slot in between - we would date it back maybe to jan
> so as to maintain a semblance of order in our release schedule?
>
>
>
Hmm...I suppose we could try to release the issue in January, instead of
February.
@Vasilis: what do you think?


>  One thing I have been wondering about is: are you still planning to have
> a first issue describing the FLOK experiment "from the inside" and use that
> as a base to CFP for a second more critical / general issue about P2P and
> the state / government or are you grouping everything into one?
>
>
> Actually, no. Vasilis and I talked about it a few days ago and we decided
that this is going to be the one and only JoPP issue on the FLOK papers. Of
course, should there be an active interest in doing a follow-up issue,
we're always willing to reconsider our view.

Best,
-G.





>  Thanks for advising,
>
>
>  cheers,
>
>
>  Mathieu
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org <
> jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of george dafermos <
> georgedafermos at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 18, 2014 19:04
> *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list
> *Cc:* Vasilis Kostakis; David Vila Viñas
> *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] JoPP special issue on policy-making for a
> commons-based society
>
>  Dear friends and colleagues,
>
> I'm writing to inform you about the 'development status' of the JoPP
> special issue on the FLOK policy proposals. According to our original
> time-plan, the FLOK policy papers, which were the epicentre of the 'Buen
> Conocer summit' that we organised in Quito at the end of May, were to be
> revised and submitted to JoPP by June 31. However, the scope of the
> revisions turned out to be much larger than was originally anticipated. As
> a result, about half of the papers are still being revised. And so, Vasilis
> and I decided it would make sense to extend the deadline for the submission
> of manuscripts to Sep. 30. Consequently, the time-planning of the issue
> would have to be modified as follows:
>
> - deadline for the submission of papers: Sep 30 (was June 30)
> - end of peer review process: Nov. 30 (was Aug 30)
> - submission of revised papers: Dec. 30 (was Oct 30)
> - issue goes live on the web: Feb 2015 (was Dec. 2014)
>
> We're hoping this 'deviation' does not conflict with the planning of other
> JoPP issues. So, please let us know if you have any objections to the above
> time-plan.
>
> On a related note, we're looking for reviewers, so it'd be great if list
> members could help. The list of papers is as follows:
>
> 1. open educational resources
> 2. open science
> 3. open/free culture
> 4. biodiversity
> 5. sustainable agriculture
> 6. open, distributed manufacturing
> 7. distributed energy
> 8. public policy for a partner state
> 9. public policy for a social economy
> 10. social knowledge and the social economy
> 11. ICT & open government
> 12. free hardware
> 13. free software
> 14. connectivity
> 15. Ancestral knowledge
> 16. Territorial organisation of the knowledge economy
>
> So, if you're interested in reviewing any of the above papers, please drop
> me a line.
>
> Best,
> -G.
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20140722/76d88a69/attachment.htm