<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Mathieu, hi all,<br><br>First of all, I'd like to thank all list members who responded to our call for reviewers. We will contact you over the coming weeks (off-list) to coordinate the review process.<br>
<br></div>As for your questions, see inline.<br><div><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Mathieu ONeil <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mathieu.oneil@anu.edu.au" target="_blank">mathieu.oneil@anu.edu.au</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">[...]<p><span style="font-size:12pt">So your issue could slot in between - we would date it back maybe to jan so as to maintain a semblance of order in our release schedule?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt"><br></span></p></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hmm...I suppose we could try to release the issue in January, instead of February. <br></div><div>@Vasilis: what do you think? <br></div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p><span style="font-size:12pt">
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt">One thing I have been wondering about is: are you still planning to have a first issue describing the FLOK experiment "from the inside" and use that as a base to CFP for a second more critical / general issue about P2P and
the state / government or are you grouping everything into one? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt"><br></span></p></div></blockquote><div>Actually, no. Vasilis and I talked about it a few days ago and we decided that this is going to be the one and only JoPP issue on the FLOK papers. Of course, should there be an active interest in doing a follow-up issue, we're always willing to reconsider our view. <br>
<br></div><div>Best,<br></div><div>-G.<br><br><br></div><div><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p><span style="font-size:12pt">
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt">Thanks for advising,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt">cheers,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:12pt">Mathieu</span></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div style="color:rgb(33,33,33)">
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org" target="_blank">jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org</a> <<a href="mailto:jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org" target="_blank">jopp-public-bounces@lists.ourproject.org</a>> on behalf of george dafermos <<a href="mailto:georgedafermos@gmail.com" target="_blank">georgedafermos@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, July 18, 2014 19:04<br>
<b>To:</b> Journal of Peer Production's general and public list<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Vasilis Kostakis; David Vila Viñas<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [JoPP-Public] JoPP special issue on policy-making for a commons-based society</font>
<div> </div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Dear friends and colleagues,<br>
<br>
I'm writing to inform you about the 'development status' of the JoPP special issue on the FLOK policy proposals. According to our original time-plan, the FLOK policy papers, which were the epicentre of the 'Buen Conocer summit' that we organised in Quito at
the end of May, were to be revised and submitted to JoPP by June 31. However, the scope of the revisions turned out to be much larger than was originally anticipated. As a result, about half of the papers are still being revised. And so, Vasilis and I decided
it would make sense to extend the deadline for the submission of manuscripts to Sep. 30. Consequently, the time-planning of the issue would have to be modified as follows:<br>
<br>
- deadline for the submission of papers: Sep 30 (was June 30)<br>
- end of peer review process: Nov. 30 (was Aug 30)<br>
- submission of revised papers: Dec. 30 (was Oct 30)<br>
- issue goes live on the web: Feb 2015 (was Dec. 2014)<br>
<br>
We're hoping this 'deviation' does not conflict with the planning of other JoPP issues. So, please let us know if you have any objections to the above time-plan.
<br>
<br>
On a related note, we're looking for reviewers, so it'd be great if list members could help. The list of papers is as follows:
<br>
<br>
1. open educational resources<br>
2. open science<br>
3. open/free culture<br>
4. biodiversity<br>
5. sustainable agriculture<br>
6. open, distributed manufacturing<br>
7. distributed energy<br>
8. public policy for a partner state<br>
9. public policy for a social economy<br>
10. social knowledge and the social economy<br>
11. ICT & open government<br>
12. free hardware<br>
13. free software<br>
14. connectivity<br>
15. Ancestral knowledge<br>
16. Territorial organisation of the knowledge economy<br>
<br>
So, if you're interested in reviewing any of the above papers, please drop me a line.
<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
-G.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
JoPP-Public mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org">JoPP-Public@lists.ourproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public" target="_blank">https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>