[implementations-list] style; VCS

[Vegard Øye]

> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:22:57 +0100
> From: stepnem at gmail.com
>
> Yeah, well [Mercurial] would be an option, if it matters to stick
> with Assembla

What's wrong with Assembla?

>> I'm not the maintainer, so it's not my decision to make.
>
> Uhm, honestly, Alessandro and Jason are just being (and have been
> for some time) ridiculous at this point if they perceive themselves
> as Vimpulse maintainers.

I think Jason did a good job as semi-maintainer while Alessandro
was busy, but now I haven't heard from either since the release of
Vimpulse 0.3.1.

I have the administrative privileges to add Mercurial source control,
but I think it's too big a decision for me to make alone. The
immediate costs, like unfamiliarity and loss of revision history,
need to be taken into account as well.

Still, I am curious as to why you think it would be "soooo much more
convenient" to use something else than SVN. :) While a dozen arguments
against SVN can be googled in a heartbeat, what are /your/ reasons for
disliking it? I want to know.

Vegard
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Få nye Windows Live™ Messenger.
http://download.live.com/messenger