entiendo entonces que la restriccion del scilab no me impide cambiar y redistribuir comercialmente la obra, salvo que pretenda "registrarla como otra obra" que seria derivada del scilab. 2008/4/13, Diego Saravia <[email protected]>:
US Copyright Office Circular 14: Derivative Works notes that:
A typical example of a derivative work received for registration in the Copyright Office is one that is primarily a new work but incorporates some previously published material. This previously published material makes the work a derivative work under the copyright law. To be copyrightable, a derivative work must be different enough from the original to be regarded as a "new work" or must contain a substantial amount of new material. Making minor changes or additions of little substance to a preexisting work will not qualify the work as a new version for copyright purposes. The new material must be original and copyrightable in itself. Titles, short phrases, and format, for example, are not copyrightable.
es decir que segun esto, pequeños cambios no estarian prohibidos.
o sea no estaria prohibido usar el scilab comercialmente aun con pequeñas correcciones o modificaciones de errores.
2008/4/13, Diego Saravia <[email protected]>:
El 13/04/08, Santiago Roza <[email protected]> escribió:
2008/4/13 Diego Saravia <[email protected]>:
Aparentemente nada prohibe modificar el scilab y distribuirlo comercialmente, si estaria prohibido hacerlo con una nueva obra derivada del scilab
me parece que no es ese el concepto. si modificas scilab y lo redistribuis, ya no es "el scilab", es una obra derivada de scilab. lo mismo para cualquier otro programa. o sea, aunque el cambio sea minimo, ya no es exactamente la misma obra.
linkearlo en otra obra es modificarlo?
http://www.rosenlaw.com/lj19.htm
http://www.linux.com/articles/113252
-- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->[email protected]
-- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->[email protected]
-- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->[email protected]