Leyendo en http://www.debian.org/intro/free me encontre que entre las licencias consideradas libres esta la licencia Artistic La OSI la Aprueba: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php --- the license is approved by OSI for certifying software as OSI Certified Open Source. --- Esta licencia es aprobada por la OSI y por Debian. Pero la FSF dice en http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#NonFreeSoftwareLicense No considerarla libre --- (Original) Artistic License We cannot say that this is a free software license because it is too vague; some passages are too clever for their own good, and their meaning is not clear. We urge you to avoid using it, except as part of the disjunctive license of Perl. The problems are matters of wording, not substance. There is a revised version of the Artistic License (dubbed "Artistic License 2.0") which is a free software license, and even compatible with the GNU GPL. This license is being considered for use in Perl 6. If you are thinking of releasing a program under the Artistic License, please do investigate other GPL-compatible, Free Software licensing options listed here first. The Artistic License 2.0 is currently in a draft phase with The Perl Foundation. FSF is in active negotations with the Perl Foundation regarding the license, and we look forward to a result which will benefit all users. --- Algunos paquetes con licencia Artistic en Debian: Estos para la FSF son no libres Para la OSI y Debian si http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/d4x http://packages.debian.org/stable/mail/razor En UTUTO teniamos el d4x y el razor en el respositorio y fue removido por esta razon en la ultima auditoria de la FSF a nuestro repositorio. happy hacking!! -- Daniel Olivera (Mate.Cosido) UTUTO - Argentina ICQ: 8368437 Jabber: [email protected] IPv4 site: www.ututo.org IPv6 site: www6.ututo.org