On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:12, Nicolás Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
El 27/01/11 10:53, Pablo Manuel Rizzo dijo:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 21:43, Nicolás Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
from my own logs:
21:38:28 fauno | when aurelien said irc logs should be public too, i replied saying that much of the stuff going on here are personal opinions 21:38:42 fauno | that doesn't count as project documentation 21:38:52 fauno | i agree meeting logs should be public, of course 21:40:25 fauno | and the transparency thing could be used the other way around 21:40:35 fauno | i won't plan a revolution on public logs
Where would you do that? As far as I know, historically every revolution was public, if it's not, then it's a conspiration, not a revolution. imho.
ok, lets call it revolutionary conspiration ¬¬
Free speech tends to be revolutionary. Do not fear free speech if you're for a revolution. Where "free" means both freedom to speak as to shut up. About words and silence, from a psychological point of view, in yesterday's newspaper: http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/psicologia/9-161196-2011-01-27.html Best :) -- Pablo Manuel Rizzo ------------------------------- http://pablorizzo.com -------------------------------