el mismo boyle lo admite On the other hand, however, it fit very well into a new literature on governing the commons from Elinor Ostrom, Robert Keohane, Margaret McKean, and many others.135 This litera- [*pg 66] ture was able to show that not every commons was a tragedy. But the literature also showed that successful commons were not entirely "free" -- they ran on layers of norms that were frequently invisible to the legal system, but which nevertheless served to avoid the various paradoxes of collective action. Whether the examples were Japanese herdsmen or Silicon Valley programmers, the literature seeks to show just how the commons was, and should be, governed.136 justamente el tema de la tragedia de los commons se basa en mostrar como si algo -que aparentemente no es escaso- es sobreexplotado por accion "libre", se convierte en escaso y o bien fracasa o bien deja de ser comunitario por suerte con las ideas no pasa lo mismo. - no pueden ser sobreexplotadas - y he aqui la diferencia esencial entre libertad de ideas y propiedad "common"/comunitaria/estatal o lo que sea, las diferencias no interesan a estos fines. La clave es la escasez. -- Diego Saravia [email protected]