On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Diego Saravia <[email protected]> wrote:
entiendo entonces que la restriccion del scilab no me impide cambiar y redistribuir comercialmente la obra, salvo que pretenda "registrarla como otra obra" que seria derivada del scilab.
no, de ninguna manera es asi. lee la licencia: 2- Definitions The SOFTWARE is defined as all successive versions of SCILAB software and their documentation that have been developed by INRIA and ENPC. SCILAB DERIVED SOFTWARE is defined as all or part of the SOFTWARE that you have modified and/or translated and/or adapted. SCILAB COMPOSITE SOFTWARE is defined as all or a part of the SOFTWARE that you have interfaced with a software, an application package or a toolbox of which you are owner or entitled beneficiary. y despues dice: 4- Object and conditions of the DERIVED SOFTWARE license 4.d Any commercial use or circulation of the DERIVED SOFTWARE shall have been previously authorized by INRIA and ENPC. 5- Object and conditions of the license concerning COMPOSITE SOFTWARE 5.d Any commercial use or distribution of COMPOSITE SOFTWARE shall have been previously authorized by INRIA and ENPC. entonces esta claro en el texto que lo que **la licencia** llama software derivado (el software original, en todo o en parte, modificado o adaptado o traducido) NO se puede redistribuir comercialmente sin autorizacion expresa del autor. y lo mismo aplica para lo que la licencia llama "software compuesto" (interfaceado, linkeado, etc). -- Santiago Roza [email protected]