Heather now says she is against p2p governance and p2p theory and says she published diagrams showing it can't work, but looking at the excerpts I have seen now and before, she is talking about exactly this, and discussing processes such as stigmergy that were treated by us about five years ago, in other words, the approval economy, is not essentially that different from what we mean by peer production and what is covered under 'p2p theory'. She reworks and expands on a body of work that has been circulating before, Without the ruckus, this could have been the basis of mutual enrichment, Michel << Message: 3 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:27:24 +0200 From: Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [P2P-F] "anonymous campaign against p2p-foundation" calmness To: P2P Foundation mailing list <[email protected]> Cc: p2p-foundation <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Please let us have a few days to calm down. Obviously heather overreacted, got angry. Her chapter on the approval economy might explain why she is sensitive about Attribution. -- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net <http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation>Updates: http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens #82 on the (En)Rich list: http://enrichlist.org/the-complete-list/