There are two links here to articles by Steve Keen. Steve Keen is stronger on the econometrics than what would be normally expected from the "dismal" corner of the social sciences. Most "physical" science people will recognize his use of the economic metrics as being essentially inductive in nature, No assumptions about labor being primarily a commodity or that economic models need to have an equilibrium nature, or that banking doesn't really have a significant impact upon economies under the privatized nature of formerly sovereign currencies, or.... There is surely more entries that I could offer, and if you will invite Keen as a significant exception associated with a non-neo-classical economic perspective. Keen is very much in the same mode of the best of the physical sciences. The strongest base of advocates for the Keynes/Minsky, et al perspective are at the University Of Missouri at Kansas City, http://econintersect.com/wordpress/?p=13354 On the "Twelve Who Forecast..." article listed it is a partial list and a "recession" no matter how great it is for some and devastating for many, "The Great Recession" doesn't begin to describe the wholesale level of fraud and arrogance which is still in the saddle as the "horse" continues to crash. Tadit