hi Natalie, I think it is probably true that a certain type of libertarianism is pretty much unusual in our p2p circles, and that certain gut reactions would make you uncomfortable; however, I for one appreciate the change to get to know such perspectives better ... Michel On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Natalie Golovin <[email protected]> wrote:
In a previous round of comments, someone said, “Let’s pack up this discussion...(I think it was profits) I’ve spent a lot of time in conversations that go nowhere, plus I get the feeling I’m an outlier, not welcome by the general P2P group. Let’s not waste each others time. I would like to stay connected, but will refrain from commenting on anything not directly related to (1)How OWS and any other groups (Tea Party-Libertarians-Paulistas, whomever) can work together to bring political pressure on Govt, Quasi-Govt “partnerships’ & the financial industry to undertake significant reforms beginning with a full audit of the FED.(2) Rethinking the US aggressive regime-change oriented foreign policy & defense conglomerate. I care very strongly about these issues and will gladly work with anyone, regardless of whatever other opinions they hold, on anything else.
_______________________________________________ P2P Foundation - Mailing list http://www.p2pfoundation.net https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
-- P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens