Hi all, My suggestion to resolve this issue would be to encourage on the JoPP web site the creation of multiple open online spaces for further discussing the articles. We could have as a "default" venue an etherpad server where authors and/or readers could create pads for discussion, whose URLs could be included at the end (or beginning) of the article. Similarly, the authors and/or could create a blog entry on their blog, a twitter hashtag, or even a Facebook group :-), and include those URLs as well in the "Further discussion" section of the article. What do you think? Panos. On 29.10.2016 00:44, willi uebelherr wrote:
Dear Mathieu,
many thanks for your answers. I was waiting more and i don't like to break your very good discussion about licence. Maxigas say very clear" the best copyright is the dead copyright. And you have to recognice, that the first step for every licence is the privatisation. The totally exclusion of others. Independent, if you use the knowledge of others for your work.
Yes, I'm a bit disappointed about your answer. I don't understand that you don't create a space for relection of the texts in your journal. It is not a question of Journal or Blog. It is more a question of our responsibility for that, what we do. Your seperation is fictitious. Of course, we can create every form of fiction in our head.
The result seems to be, that this list is the only place, where the readers of this journal texts can discuss and reflect the texts? And if i want to start a discussion about Alternative Internets i can do this only in this list?
For me, this is unbelievable.
many greetings, willi Asuncion, Paraguay
2016-10-17 22:08 GMT-03:00 Mathieu ONeil <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hi Willi, all
This list is pretty quiet at the moment. There have not been theoretical discussions for a while, it's mostly used to advertise releases, coordinate actions, launch or evaluate initiatives, etc.
However if you have a substantive point about (a) specific article(s) you are welcome to post it here, and if authors or other subscribers are interested they might respond.
cheers
Mathieu
PS. This is a journal, released biannully, not a blog: that's why it's called 'the Journal of Peer Production' - not 'the Blog of Peer Production'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* JoPP-Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of willi uebelherr <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 18, 2016 6:08 *To:* JoPP List *Subject:* [JoPP-Public] JoPP journal #9 Dear friends,
i am new on this list. I want to discuss with you and the authors of the texts some principles for telecommunication and internet. Mostly oriented to the basic terms, structures and functions.
In the blog www.peerproduction.org <http://www.peerproduction.org> i don't find a comment function. Commons-base Peer Production: campaign for elections and ... <http://www.peerproduction.org/> www.peerproduction.org <http://www.peerproduction.org> Campaigns for elections and elected representatives This is the future site of a Canada-wide campaign to bring commons-based peer production into view of candidates ...
Where you discuss the contents of this articles and texts? And where we can connect to the authors?
many greetings, willi actual: Asuncion, Paraguay
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public <https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public>
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public