Hi maxigas Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info. 1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter... cheers Mathieu ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of maxigas <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 22:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? hi, Please find below our exchange with Denisa Kera on working towards including JoPP in the ERIH database. maxigas
From: Denisa Kera <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:11:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? To: maxigas <[email protected]>
Going to the airport, but the base line is that when you apply for jobs, tenure, evaluation etc you will run into a problem... ERIH would make sense, yes send it to the rest to see what they think. I like the people/networks the content, we neede to improve this, get the missing data, give DOI to articles etc
On Fri, May 6, 2016, 05:07 maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Denisa Kera <[email protected]> writes:
Maxigas,
Hi Denisa, nice to hear from you!
Can we prepare these three criteria about JPP so its accepted in ERIH https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/
Can I repost your message to the JoPP-public list?
I think it is becoming a good journal, especially in our community...
I agree! I am proud to say that we developed it into something like a veritable intellectual laboratory, at least from my perspective. :)
The main issues seems "
* ERIH PLUS requires that no more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution."
- do you have the data?
No -- in fact I guess that the majority of issues don't include information on author's affiliation. :( Even worse, we are not doing well on the other criteria either:
* All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field
I am not even sure if there are abstracts published for papers, which is a pity because the editorial process of course already includes abstracts.
* Information on author affiliations and addresses
See above.
* No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
So as far as I see it, it would be quite a job to convert JoPP to conform these criteria.
What are the benefits of inclusion?
Is there somebody to work on this?
Maybe we can include it on a roadmap?
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes. _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public