[Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
hi, Please find below our exchange with Denisa Kera on working towards including JoPP in the ERIH database. maxigas
From: Denisa Kera <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:11:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? To: maxigas <[email protected]>
Going to the airport, but the base line is that when you apply for jobs, tenure, evaluation etc you will run into a problem... ERIH would make sense, yes send it to the rest to see what they think. I like the people/networks the content, we neede to improve this, get the missing data, give DOI to articles etc
On Fri, May 6, 2016, 05:07 maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Denisa Kera <[email protected]> writes:
Maxigas,
Hi Denisa, nice to hear from you!
Can we prepare these three criteria about JPP so its accepted in ERIH https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/
Can I repost your message to the JoPP-public list?
I think it is becoming a good journal, especially in our community...
I agree! I am proud to say that we developed it into something like a veritable intellectual laboratory, at least from my perspective. :)
The main issues seems "
* ERIH PLUS requires that no more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution."
- do you have the data?
No -- in fact I guess that the majority of issues don't include information on author's affiliation. :( Even worse, we are not doing well on the other criteria either:
* All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field
I am not even sure if there are abstracts published for papers, which is a pity because the editorial process of course already includes abstracts.
* Information on author affiliations and addresses
See above.
* No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
So as far as I see it, it would be quite a job to convert JoPP to conform these criteria.
What are the benefits of inclusion?
Is there somebody to work on this?
Maybe we can include it on a roadmap?
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
Hi, As someone who has greatly benefitted from the Journal, I'd be happy to help in any logistical stuff you need. Just let me know if I can help. Cheers. On 6 May 2016 at 07:27, maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
hi,
Please find below our exchange with Denisa Kera on working towards including JoPP in the ERIH database.
maxigas
From: Denisa Kera <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:11:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? To: maxigas <[email protected]>
Going to the airport, but the base line is that when you apply for jobs, tenure, evaluation etc you will run into a problem... ERIH would make sense, yes send it to the rest to see what they think. I like the people/networks the content, we neede to improve this, get the missing data, give DOI to articles etc
On Fri, May 6, 2016, 05:07 maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Denisa Kera <[email protected]> writes:
Maxigas,
Hi Denisa, nice to hear from you!
Can we prepare these three criteria about JPP so its accepted in ERIH https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/
Can I repost your message to the JoPP-public list?
I think it is becoming a good journal, especially in our community...
I agree! I am proud to say that we developed it into something like a veritable intellectual laboratory, at least from my perspective. :)
The main issues seems "
* ERIH PLUS requires that no more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution."
- do you have the data?
No -- in fact I guess that the majority of issues don't include information on author's affiliation. :( Even worse, we are not doing well on the other criteria either:
* All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field
I am not even sure if there are abstracts published for papers, which is a pity because the editorial process of course already includes abstracts.
* Information on author affiliations and addresses
See above.
* No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
So as far as I see it, it would be quite a job to convert JoPP to conform these criteria.
What are the benefits of inclusion?
Is there somebody to work on this?
Maybe we can include it on a roadmap?
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
Hi maxigas Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info. 1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter... cheers Mathieu ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of maxigas <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 22:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? hi, Please find below our exchange with Denisa Kera on working towards including JoPP in the ERIH database. maxigas
From: Denisa Kera <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:11:48 +0000 Subject: Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? To: maxigas <[email protected]>
Going to the airport, but the base line is that when you apply for jobs, tenure, evaluation etc you will run into a problem... ERIH would make sense, yes send it to the rest to see what they think. I like the people/networks the content, we neede to improve this, get the missing data, give DOI to articles etc
On Fri, May 6, 2016, 05:07 maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Denisa Kera <[email protected]> writes:
Maxigas,
Hi Denisa, nice to hear from you!
Can we prepare these three criteria about JPP so its accepted in ERIH https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/
Can I repost your message to the JoPP-public list?
I think it is becoming a good journal, especially in our community...
I agree! I am proud to say that we developed it into something like a veritable intellectual laboratory, at least from my perspective. :)
The main issues seems "
* ERIH PLUS requires that no more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution."
- do you have the data?
No -- in fact I guess that the majority of issues don't include information on author's affiliation. :( Even worse, we are not doing well on the other criteria either:
* All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field
I am not even sure if there are abstracts published for papers, which is a pity because the editorial process of course already includes abstracts.
* Information on author affiliations and addresses
See above.
* No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
So as far as I see it, it would be quite a job to convert JoPP to conform these criteria.
What are the benefits of inclusion?
Is there somebody to work on this?
Maybe we can include it on a roadmap?
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes. _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues? I would add them to #5. Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail? Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact... -- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all- (Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message) I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-) So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..? One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail? @Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline. cheers Mathieu ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of maxigas <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues? I would add them to #5. Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail? Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact... -- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes. _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all-
(Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message)
I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-)
So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..?
Sounds like a plan! Let's do it?
One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail?
I volunteer to find out -- writing them an electronic letter now.
@Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline.
That would be awesome -- JoPP needs more offline action! :)
cheers
Mathieu
________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of maxigas <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues?
I would add them to #5.
Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail?
Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact...
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
Hi all, Yes, I could do that! Gonna start a Drive doc and add you if you wish, then I can start gathering the names and doing all the leg work needed. On 7 May 2016 at 06:46, maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all-
(Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message)
I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-)
So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..?
Sounds like a plan! Let's do it?
One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail?
I volunteer to find out -- writing them an electronic letter now.
@Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline.
That would be awesome -- JoPP needs more offline action! :)
cheers
Mathieu
________________________________________ From: [email protected] < [email protected]> on behalf of maxigas < [email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues?
I would add them to #5.
Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail?
Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact...
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
Hi Giancarlo, Great - thanks! :-) As suggested by Vasilis a while back I used the P2P Lab etherpad to create an editable doc. You can find it here: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_author_list cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 6:29 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Cc: Mathieu ONeil; [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? Hi all, Yes, I could do that! Gonna start a Drive doc and add you if you wish, then I can start gathering the names and doing all the leg work needed. On 7 May 2016 at 06:46, maxigas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes:
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all-
(Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message)
I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-)
So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..?
Sounds like a plan! Let's do it?
One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail?
I volunteer to find out -- writing them an electronic letter now.
@Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline.
That would be awesome -- JoPP needs more offline action! :)
cheers
Mathieu
________________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of maxigas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues?
I would add them to #5.
Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail?
Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact...
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ????? - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ????? - clean the volcanoes. _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public -- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures<http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures.<http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
Fantastic, I'll get to work. On 7 May 2016 at 18:50, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Giancarlo,
Great - thanks! :-)
As suggested by Vasilis a while back I used the P2P Lab etherpad to create an editable doc.
You can find it here: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_author_list
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------ *From:* Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]> *Sent:* Sunday, May 8, 2016 6:29 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list *Cc:* Mathieu ONeil; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Hi all,
Yes, I could do that! Gonna start a Drive doc and add you if you wish, then I can start gathering the names and doing all the leg work needed.
On 7 May 2016 at 06:46, maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all-
(Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message)
I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-)
So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..?
Sounds like a plan! Let's do it?
One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail?
I volunteer to find out -- writing them an electronic letter now.
@Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline.
That would be awesome -- JoPP needs more offline action! :)
cheers
Mathieu
________________________________________ From: [email protected] < [email protected]> on behalf of maxigas < [email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues?
I would add them to #5.
Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail?
Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact...
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
--
Giancarlo M. Sandoval
@revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures>
Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
-- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
Okay, step 1 (putting all the names) is done Looking like this http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_author_list Step 2 (getting all the contact info) is on its way. Step 3 (calling) follows from that. :) On 9 May 2016 at 10:55, Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]> wrote:
Fantastic, I'll get to work.
On 7 May 2016 at 18:50, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Giancarlo,
Great - thanks! :-)
As suggested by Vasilis a while back I used the P2P Lab etherpad to create an editable doc.
You can find it here: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_author_list
cheers
Mathieu
------------------------------ *From:* Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]> *Sent:* Sunday, May 8, 2016 6:29 *To:* Journal of Peer Production's general and public list *Cc:* Mathieu ONeil; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Hi all,
Yes, I could do that! Gonna start a Drive doc and add you if you wish, then I can start gathering the names and doing all the leg work needed.
On 7 May 2016 at 06:46, maxigas <[email protected]> wrote:
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all-
(Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message)
I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-)
So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..?
Sounds like a plan! Let's do it?
One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail?
I volunteer to find out -- writing them an electronic letter now.
@Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline.
That would be awesome -- JoPP needs more offline action! :)
cheers
Mathieu
________________________________________ From: [email protected] < [email protected]> on behalf of maxigas < [email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues?
I would add them to #5.
Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail?
Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact...
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
--
Giancarlo M. Sandoval
@revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures>
Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
--
Giancarlo M. Sandoval
@revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures>
Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
-- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
Hi Giancarlo Great! Btw I edited JoPP 0 :-) @maxigas: any update on what kind of address is needed? cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:37 To: Mathieu ONeil Cc: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? Okay, step 1 (putting all the names) is done Looking like this http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_author_list Step 2 (getting all the contact info) is on its way. Step 3 (calling) follows from that. :) On 9 May 2016 at 10:55, Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Fantastic, I'll get to work. On 7 May 2016 at 18:50, Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Giancarlo, Great - thanks! :-) As suggested by Vasilis a while back I used the P2P Lab etherpad to create an editable doc. You can find it here: http://etherpad2-p2plab.rhcloud.com/p/JoPP_author_list cheers Mathieu ________________________________ From: Giancarlo M. Sandoval <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 6:29 To: Journal of Peer Production's general and public list Cc: Mathieu ONeil; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH? Hi all, Yes, I could do that! Gonna start a Drive doc and add you if you wish, then I can start gathering the names and doing all the leg work needed. On 7 May 2016 at 06:46, maxigas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes:
Hi Maxigas, Giancarlo, all-
(Sorry, just too used to replying at top of message)
I think not many people have editing rights since Peter rebooted the site. For example I have not requested them yet even though I started it. :-)
So I don't think it's realistic to expect all the editors to do this now. Maybe one person can collect all the names and institutional/professional addresses of contributors from issue editors (this person could be Giancarlo since he offered to help) and pass them on to the editorial team who can then divide up the issues (in some cases editorial team members are issue editors anyway) and insert the content? That way the work is spread out a bit..?
Sounds like a plan! Let's do it?
One thing we need to make sure of is whether it's only peer reviewed papers which need addresses or invited comments etc as well? I assume the latter but it would be good to find out. Also what exactly is meant by address should be determined... I assume snail?
I volunteer to find out -- writing them an electronic letter now.
@Giancarlo: Hi, thanks for offering to help. :-) If you like, you could help us out by gathering the names of contributors, and once you have them, contacting the issue editors to ask them for their addresses. If you are interested we can work out the details offline.
That would be awesome -- JoPP needs more offline action! :)
cheers
Mathieu
________________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of maxigas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:03 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
Mathieu ONeil <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> writes:
Hi maxigas
Thanks for taking the lead on this. Looking at the criteria on the webpage, I think we meet them all, though (5) may be incomplete in some cases which affects (6). Not too hard to fix though: issue editors can be asked to provide this info.
1-Explicit procedures for external peer review 2-Academic editorial board, with members affiliated with universities or other independent research organizations 3-Valid ISSN code, confirmed by the international ISSN register 4-All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English and/or another international language relevant for the field 5-Information on author affiliations and addresses 6-No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are from the same institution
Now, If they required DOI for every article that would be a different matter...
Cool -- can issue editors comment on whether or not they would be willing to add "author affiliations and addresses" to their issues?
I would add them to #5.
Is it clear what is "addresses" here? Email? Snail?
Both is a bit of a privacy concern in fact...
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/
In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online
Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ????? - clean the volcanoes.
_______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-- maxigas, kiberpunk FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166 http://relay70.metatron.ai/ In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub http://custodians.online Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata - care for the backup. Water the ????? - clean the volcanoes. _______________________________________________ JoPP-Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public -- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures<http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures.<http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM> -- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures<http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures.<http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM> -- Giancarlo M. Sandoval @revfutures<http://www.twitter.com/revfutures> Revisionary Futures.<http://www.revisionaryfutures.com> <http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
participants (3)
-
Giancarlo M. Sandoval -
Mathieu ONeil -
maxigas