Then, It should be cut. The authors can published the extended version as a chapter of a book, or on line., making a note in JoPP`s version and referring the reader to the extended version. best Jakob
Steve Collins <[email protected]> 08/21/14 3:50 AM >>> Thanks Jakob - the article has already been reviewed and reviewers said it should be cut down to meet JoPP article length requirements. Mathieu suggested surveying the JoPP ist.
-- Dr Steve Collins Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Program Director / BA-Media / Bachelor Marketing and Media Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D On 21 August 2014 03:07, Jakob Rigi <[email protected]> wrote: If the arguments launch a new paradigm , and there are reviewers who want to review it I think we should go with length, otherwise they should cut it to Maximum 10000 words, best Jakob
Steve Collins <[email protected]> 08/19/14 2:39 AM >>> Hi All
Quick question about article word lengths. Where should we draw the line? Angela and I have received a paper that's in excess of 18,000 words. The authors have questioned our request to cut it down stating that it would seriously undermine their article. What does the list think? thx steve -- Dr Steve Collins Senior Lecturer in Multimedia Program Director / BA-Media / Bachelor Marketing and Media Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies Macquarie University P: (02) 9850 2165 W: http://bit.ly/122QivW L: Y3A 191D