Then, It should be cut. The authors can published the extended version as a chapter of a book, or on line.,  making a note in JoPP`s version and referring the reader to the extended version.

best

Jakob



>>> Steve Collins <stephen.collins@mq.edu.au> 08/21/14 3:50 AM >>>
Thanks Jakob - the article has already been reviewed and reviewers said it should be cut down to meet JoPP article length requirements. Mathieu suggested surveying the JoPP ist.


--
Dr Steve Collins
Senior Lecturer in Multimedia
Program Director / BA-Media / Bachelor Marketing and Media
Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies
Macquarie University

P: (02) 9850 2165
W: http://bit.ly/122QivW
L: Y3A 191D


On 21 August 2014 03:07, Jakob Rigi <rigij@ceu.hu> wrote:
If the arguments launch a  new paradigm , and there are reviewers who want to review it I think we should go with length, otherwise they should cut it to Maximum 10000 words,

best
Jakob

>>> Steve Collins <stephen.collins@mq.edu.au> 08/19/14 2:39 AM >>>

Hi All

Quick question about article word lengths. Where should we draw the line? Angela and I have received a paper that's in excess of 18,000 words. The authors have questioned our request to cut it down stating that it would seriously undermine their article.

What does the list think?

thx
steve

--
Dr Steve Collins
Senior Lecturer in Multimedia
Program Director / BA-Media / Bachelor Marketing and Media
Department of Media, Music, Communication & Cultural Studies
Macquarie University

P: (02) 9850 2165
W: http://bit.ly/122QivW
L: Y3A 191D