Hi Titus, On 3 September 2012 10:02, Titus von der Malsburg <[email protected]> wrote:

What :q and :wq should do in Evil is a matter of taste. I redefined them (in init.el) to only close the buffer and leave the window untouched. See below.

Thanks! These behave exactly as I prefer it! Guido

Titus

(evil-define-command evil-quit (&optional bang) "Closes the current buffer." :repeat nil (interactive "<!>") (when bang (set-buffer-modified-p nil)) (kill-this-buffer))

(evil-define-command evil-save-and-close (file &optional bang) "Saves the current buffer and closes the window." :repeat nil (interactive "<f><!>") (evil-write nil nil nil file bang) (evil-quit bang))

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Guido Van Hoecke <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Hi,

I usualy have a 2x2 window configuration for my Emacs frame. My evil-version is 0.1 and my emacs is GNU Emacs 24.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2012-08-27 on bob.porkrind.org

Anybody has an idea why :q or :wq not only gets rid of the buffer, but also of the window?

Editing a file in window 2 with following configuration

-1- -2- -3- -4-

and doing :q in -2- I end up with configuration

---1--- -3- -4-

This is rather annoying.

Any pointers?

TIA,

Guido

-- No one knows like a woman how to say things that are at once gentle and deep. -- Hugo

http://vanhoecke.org ... and go2 places!

_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list

-- Titus von der Malsburg DFG Research Group 868: Mind and Brain Dynamics Dept. of Linguistics, University of Potsdam http://www.ling.uni-potsdam.de/~malsburg/

Hi Sanel, On 3 September 2012 10:04, Sanel Zukan <[email protected]> wrote:

AFAIK this is how vim behaves. Also, the buffer is not deleted, only window where that buffer is shown (the same as in vim).

Thanks for the info. I like to keep the window, and now happily use the redefined commands suggested by Titus. Kind regards, Guido

Regards, Sanel

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Guido Van Hoecke <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Hi,

I usualy have a 2x2 window configuration for my Emacs frame. My evil-version is 0.1 and my emacs is GNU Emacs 24.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2012-08-27 on bob.porkrind.org

Anybody has an idea why :q or :wq not only gets rid of the buffer, but also of the window?

Editing a file in window 2 with following configuration

-1- -2- -3- -4-

and doing :q in -2- I end up with configuration

---1--- -3- -4-

This is rather annoying.

Any pointers?

TIA,

Guido

-- No one knows like a woman how to say things that are at once gentle and deep. -- Hugo

http://vanhoecke.org ... and go2 places!

_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list

_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list