Hi Sanel, On 3 September 2012 10:04, Sanel Zukan <[email protected]> wrote:
AFAIK this is how vim behaves. Also, the buffer is not deleted, only window where that buffer is shown (the same as in vim).
Thanks for the info. I like to keep the window, and now happily use the redefined commands suggested by Titus. Kind regards, Guido
Regards, Sanel
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Guido Van Hoecke <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I usualy have a 2x2 window configuration for my Emacs frame. My evil-version is 0.1 and my emacs is GNU Emacs 24.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2012-08-27 on bob.porkrind.org
Anybody has an idea why :q or :wq not only gets rid of the buffer, but also of the window?
Editing a file in window 2 with following configuration
-1- -2- -3- -4-
and doing :q in -2- I end up with configuration
---1--- -3- -4-
This is rather annoying.
Any pointers?
TIA,
Guido
-- No one knows like a woman how to say things that are at once gentle and deep. -- Hugo
http://vanhoecke.org ... and go2 places!
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list