Hi Titus, On 3 September 2012 10:02, Titus von der Malsburg <[email protected]> wrote:
What :q and :wq should do in Evil is a matter of taste. I redefined them (in init.el) to only close the buffer and leave the window untouched. See below.
Thanks! These behave exactly as I prefer it! Guido
Titus
(evil-define-command evil-quit (&optional bang) "Closes the current buffer." :repeat nil (interactive "<!>") (when bang (set-buffer-modified-p nil)) (kill-this-buffer))
(evil-define-command evil-save-and-close (file &optional bang) "Saves the current buffer and closes the window." :repeat nil (interactive "<f><!>") (evil-write nil nil nil file bang) (evil-quit bang))
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Guido Van Hoecke <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I usualy have a 2x2 window configuration for my Emacs frame. My evil-version is 0.1 and my emacs is GNU Emacs 24.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2012-08-27 on bob.porkrind.org
Anybody has an idea why :q or :wq not only gets rid of the buffer, but also of the window?
Editing a file in window 2 with following configuration
-1- -2- -3- -4-
and doing :q in -2- I end up with configuration
---1--- -3- -4-
This is rather annoying.
Any pointers?
TIA,
Guido
-- No one knows like a woman how to say things that are at once gentle and deep. -- Hugo
http://vanhoecke.org ... and go2 places!
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
-- Titus von der Malsburg DFG Research Group 868: Mind and Brain Dynamics Dept. of Linguistics, University of Potsdam http://www.ling.uni-potsdam.de/~malsburg/