[Solar-general] Fwd: [hipatia] Opiniones de Linus Torvalds

[Diego Saravia]

el drm es el establecimiiento de la dictadura digital definitva

solo podras ejecutar los programas que las empresas quieran

2006/9/21, Marcos Guglielmetti <marcospcmusica en gmail.com>:
> El Jueves, 21 de Septiembre de 2006 15:49, Diego Saravia escribió:
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Juan Carlos Gentile Fagundez <jucar en hipatia.net>
> > Date: 21-sep-2006 0:23
> > Subject: [hipatia] Opiniones de Linus Torvalds
> > To: coordinadores-hipatia en listas.hipatia.info
> >
> >
>
> Se tornó dura la mano: si muchos desarrolladores siguen la idea de Linus
> de "no importan los DRM", tendremos un futuro negro ¿no?, porque la creación
> de drivers será más compleja porque podría ser ilegal examinar un hardware
> con DRM, ¿no?
>
> >
> >
> > Torvalds lambasts Free Software Foundation
> >
> > July 28, 2006 3:12 PM PDT
> >
> > Linux leader Linus Torvalds had some sharp words about the Free
> > Software Foundation its founder, Richard Stallman, and his
> > philosophical motivations.
> >
> > The foundation is updating the General Public License (GPL) that
> > governs thousands of open-source software projects, including the
> > Linux operating system kernel. Torvalds has explicitly chosen GPL
> > version 2 to govern Linux, and Torvalds' objections to GPLv3 drafts,
> > it appears unlikely he'll change that position.
> >
> > Torvalds, though, objects not just to the terms of the new license,
> > but to the foundation's motivations, Stallman's philosophy, and the
> > process by which the foundation and its top lawyer, Eben Moglen, are
> > updating the GPL. In postings today to the Groklaw legal discussion
> > site--where issues often are hotly debated--Torvalds unleashed several
> > criticisms. (He confirmed the postings' authenticity in an e-mail to
> > CNET News.com.)
> >
> > GPLv2 is about a "quid pro quo": If I give you my open-source
> > software, you're free to use it but must give the world back any
> > changes you make, Torvalds said. "The reason for the GPL as far as the
> > FSF is concerned was never 'fairness.' It was all about a higher
> > calling, and about something that the FSF thinks is much
> > bigger--'freedom,'" Torvalds said in one posting. "I disagree. I think
> > that 'freedom' is fine, but we're not exactly talking about slavery
> > here. Trying to make it look like we're the Abraham Lincoln of our
> > generation just makes us look stupid and stuck up. I'd much rather
> > talk about 'fairness' and about issues like just being a much better
> > process for generating better code, and having fun while doing so."
> >
> > The GPLv3, Torvalds added, is "inferior" to its predecessor. "It's
> > purely a firebrand, and only good for the extremist policies of the
> > FSF," Torvalds said. "The FSF doesn't like that Linux in particular
> > turned the GPLv2 into something pragmatic. The GPLv3 is designed to
> > take the FSF back to its original 'good old days,' when 'Free
> > Software' was a war, and RMS (Stallman) was its proselytizing general.
> > But the fact is, it's not a war, and peaceful and happy co-existence
> > is actually much preferable to moral jihads."
> >
> > "The FSF has been acting idiotic for the last decade. Why do you think
> > it's called 'open source' in the first place? Exactly because the FSF
> > has made a dirty word out of freedom,'" he said in another posting.
> > (The term "open-source software" was coined in the late 1990s to
> > describe an offshoot of "free software" movement.) "The people who are
> > spoiling for a fight are not the people who are actually getting
> > things done."
> >
> > Torvalds said he believes fear is the impetus behind the new GPL.
> > "Every single big and fundamental addition to the GPLv3 is about hate
> > and fear," he said. And it's a bad motivation, he argued: "No good
> > code ever comes out of people who do things because they are afraid,
> > or because they hate. Look at all the idiotic choices that Sun
> > (Microsystems) has made with respect to Java and other things. A lot
> > of them seem to be directly a result not of trying to do the right
> > thing to their customer, but because of fear and loathing of their
> > competition."
> >
> > The result: "The GPLv3 is a total disaster," Torvalds said in another post.
> >
> > Torvalds also criticized the GPLv3 process. "So as far as I can tell,
> > the whole GPLv3 'process' has been a sham from the very beginning.
> > Eben and Richard talk about 'discussion drafts,' but it's not
> > 'discussion' if you don't actually care what the other side says,"
> > Torvalds said. "And Richard most definitely doesn't care."
> > _______________________________________________
> > lista coordinadores-hipatia
> > coordinadores-hipatia en listas.hipatia.info
> > http://listas.hipatia.info/mailman/listinfo/coordinadores-hipatia
> > www.listas.hipatia.info - info en listas.hipatia.info
>
> --
> Marcos Guglielmetti
> * Director del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux, 100% Software Libre
> * CD Donwload: (http://www.musix.org.ar/en/) (www.pc-musica.com.ar/musix)
> * Videos, programas y otras cosas en: ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/
> * Reporte de errores a:
> https://www.musix.org.ar/wiki/index.php?title=Problemas-Bugs
> *IRC: #musix channel on freenode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Solar-general mailing list
> Solar-general en lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/solar-general
>


-- 
Diego Saravia
Diego.Saravia en gmail.com
NO FUNCIONA->dsa en unsa.edu.ar