[Solar-general] Re: Licencia Artistic aprobada por OSI y Debian pero no por FSF

[Santiago Roza]

la estuve leyendo, y realmente que licencia chot*: mal escrita, y ni
las restricciones estan claras...

- "the right to use and distribute the Package in a more-or-less
customary fashion" ("mas o menos consuetudinario"??)
- "the right to make reasonable modifications" (cuales serian las
no-razonables?)
- "You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of
this Package" (que monto seria no-razonable??)

y asi mil cosas mas...

On 9/21/05, Daniel Olivera <daniel en ututo.org> wrote:
> Leyendo en http://www.debian.org/intro/free me encontre que entre las
> licencias consideradas libres esta la licencia Artistic
>
> La OSI la Aprueba:
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php
>
> ---
> the license is approved by OSI for certifying software as OSI Certified
> Open Source.
> ---
>
> Esta licencia es aprobada por la OSI y por Debian.
>
>
>
> Pero la FSF dice en
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#NonFreeSoftwareLicense
> No considerarla libre
>
> ---
> (Original) Artistic License
>
>     We cannot say that this is a free software license because it is
> too vague; some passages are too clever for their own good, and their
> meaning is not clear. We urge you to avoid using it, except as part of
> the disjunctive license of Perl.
>
>     The problems are matters of wording, not substance. There is a
> revised version of the Artistic License (dubbed "Artistic License 2.0")
> which is a free software license, and even compatible with the GNU GPL.
> This license is being considered for use in Perl 6. If you are thinking
> of releasing a program under the Artistic License, please do
> investigate other GPL-compatible, Free Software licensing options
> listed here first.
>
>     The Artistic License 2.0 is currently in a draft phase with The
> Perl Foundation. FSF is in active negotations with the Perl Foundation
> regarding the license, and we look forward to a result which will
> benefit all users.
> ---
>
> Algunos paquetes con licencia Artistic en Debian:
> Estos para la FSF son no libres
> Para la OSI y Debian si
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/d4x
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/mail/razor
>
>
> En UTUTO teniamos el d4x y el razor en el respositorio y fue removido
> por esta razon en la ultima auditoria de la FSF a nuestro repositorio.
>
>
>
> happy hacking!!
> --
> Daniel Olivera (Mate.Cosido)
> UTUTO - Argentina
>
> ICQ: 8368437
> Jabber: dolivera en jabber.org
> IPv4 site: www.ututo.org
> IPv6 site: www6.ututo.org
>
>
>


--
Santiago Roza
santiagoroza en gmail.com
http://santiagoroza.blogspot.com/