[P2P-es] Ecuador as a state form, the proposal for a Partner State...

Jue Jul 17 20:33:49 CEST 2014

Estimado Willi

Gracias por tu aporte. El idioma de la lista p2p-es es el espaÃ±ol, por lo
que no es buena idea "to bring this two language spaces together"
imponiendo el inglÃ©s, como no lo es enviar el mismo mail a listas con
diferentes idiomas. TÃº mismo criticaste a los que escribÃan en inglÃ©s a las
listas de FLOK. Lo correcto es enviarlo a diferentes listas, cada una con
su idioma, o escribir en todos los idiomas para todas

Un abrazo
Bernardo

Dear Willi

Thanks for your comment. The commom language of p2p-es is Spanish, so I
think it is not a good idea "to bring this two language spaces together"
imposing English, as it is not a good practice to send the same mail with
just one language to different lists. You were  critic with those who wrote
in English in FLOK lists. The proper could be to send the message in
different languages to different lists or to write in both languages and
send the message

Best
Bernardo

2014-07-17 13:44 GMT-03:00 willi uebelherr <willi.uebelherr en gmail.com>:

>
> Dear friends,
>
> on the P2P-blog the discussion obout our relation to the state is going on.
>
> Ecuador as a state form, the proposal for a â€˜Partner Stateâ€™, and lessons
> for future Commons Transition Strategies
>
> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/ecuador-as-a-state-form-the-proposal-for-a-partner-state-and-lessons-for-future-commons-transition-strategies/2014/07/10#comment-810601
>
> We can do this discussion in spanish or english. Also we can continue
> this discussion on the maillists. But like was Orsan Senalp wrote - we
> have to bring this two language spaces together.
>
> many greetings, willi
> Bogota, Colombia
>
>
> --- Quiliro wrote
>
> Great to see Michelâ€™s and Williâ€™s great perspectives.
>
> I wonder what can be done in order to prevent the powerful from abusing
> the minorities or even the majorities in a stateless society as Michel
> states. Many times the majorities are manipulated in order to run over
> people that oppose the powerful, whether these powerful are part of the
> state or not. Other times, the powerful use violence and bureaucracy to
> exert their power over the majorities. What can we do in a stateless or
> stateful society against these abuses?
>
>
> --- my answer
>
> dear Quiliro and all,
>
> your question, i think, is the most important question. What we have to
> do for independence in our development of our life environment?
>
> Michel and Silke Helfrich think and say that we need the state as a
> partner state, as a cooperation partner. But we can see in Germany, what
> is going on. And we can see in Ecuador, what are the results of that.
>
> I give here to links to very different writings about the same situation.
>
> Dangerous practice of digital mass surveillance must be subject to
> independent checks and balances â€“ Pillay
>
> http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/Media.aspx?IsMediaPage=true&LangID=E
>
> Peer to Peer (P2P) Production as the Alternative to Capitalism â€“ A New
> Communist Horizon
>
> http://www.networkedlabour.net/2013/05/peer-to-peer-p2p-production-as-the-alternative-to-capitalism-a-new-communist-horizon/
>
> Navi Pillay and Jakob Rigi act on the same themes on her different
> backgrounds and her different perspektives. State or people self
> organization. But this is a pre-step in our thinking and doing.
>
> This means, that the first is that we disolve our own slavery system in
> our thinking. If we create our own perspectives and our ways for that,
> then we can cooperate with all people without to lost our orientation
> for our future.
>
> Of course, the result is that we are self-responsible for our life and
> never we can go to any institution to ask for our life basics. We have
> to do self. But never alone.
>
> Here come in the Comunas. The local life community. We break the
> primitive dualism Individual or state. As single persons we live in
> communities. This are the constitutional elements for our bigger social
> societies.
>
> State never exist. It is a virtual construction. So, why we should
> follow any stupid production of thoughts of stupid persons? I don-t
> understand, why Michel and Franz Nahrada and many other follow this
> religion.
>
> many greetings, willi
> Bogota, Colombia
>
>
>

-- 
www.futuramedia.net
www.codigo-abierto.cc
@bernardosampa (twitter) / @futura_media
SÃ£o Paulo +55 11 43044380 (fijo) +55 11 84881620 (celular)
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-lang-es/attachments/20140717/7a50a558/attachment.htm 