[P2P-F] Netention seen as Neuroeconomics ?

[Dante-Gabryell Monson]

Thanks Seth.

Your response to the
Neuroeconomics<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroeconomics> wikipedia
page with pages from the OpenCog project ( artificial intelligence ) leads
me to learn about
the "forgetting agent <http://wiki.opencog.org/w/ForgettingAgent>" and
the "Importance
Spreading Agent <http://wiki.opencog.org/w/ImportanceSpreadingAgent>",
which make me smile, especially when I imagine it in a Anthropomorphic way
:)

Attention Allocation <http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Attention_allocation> also
leads me to remember
http://p2pfoundation.net/Attention_Economy

*The Attention <http://p2pfoundation.net/Attention> Economy = an economy
driven by the exchange of attention*

*the Implicit Goal of Attention Economy is: to tightly intertwine everyone
at the level of mind*

- Michael Goldhaber
http://p2pfoundation.net/Attention_Economy_Graphs
http://p2pfoundation.net/Intention_Economy
http://p2pfoundation.net/Process_Economy


Also , for those of us that understand french ( Helene ? Michel ? ) ,  in
relation to neuroeconomics, see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIXaROv7bIU
found via Stiegler's platform
http://pharmakon.fr/wordpress/academie-dete-de-lecole-de-philosophie-depineuil-le-fleuriel/academie-2013/

My ( Dante's ) critic in relation to the Neuroeconomics as I understand
from that video presentation, is that the person presenting it does not yet
seem to break down the type of money units/tokens used based on the
contracts and transactions these tokens are based on ( and the awareness of
their - political - implications / externalities )  ,

and hence distorts "neuroeconomics" into , imho , awareness limited within
the interests of dominant protocols in a limited political economic
framework  , as it does not , as presented in that video , break down
awareness to the political interests and dynamics from the units used.

In addition, *I believe we need to create a Neuroeconomics that can also
include a granular understanding of constructs of a commons, and/or gift
economics, together ( and/or intertwined ) with other relational dynamics (
such as - see Fiske :
http://p2pfoundation.net/Relational_Model_Typology_-_Fiske  )*

Although he gives examples of Neuroeconomics on animals using other units,
such as juice or food, he then returns to study with humans based on money
( created out of protocols , imho , by , and in support of , the current
monopolistic political economy ).



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:20 PM, SeH <seh999 at gmail.com> wrote:

> http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Category:ECAN
> http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Attention_allocation
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Dante-Gabryell Monson <
> dante.monson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroeconomics
>>
>> *Neuroeconomics* is an interdisciplinary field that seeks to explain
>> human decision making <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_making>,
>> the ability to process multiple alternatives and to choose an optimal
>> course of action. It studies how economic behavior can shape our
>> understanding of the brain, and how neuroscientific discoveries can
>> constrain and guide models of economics.[1]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroeconomics#cite_note-neuroeconomics.duke.edu-1>
>>
>> It combines research methods from neuroscience<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience>
>> , experimental <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_economics> and behavioral
>> economics <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_economics>, and
>> cognitive <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_psychology> and social<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_psychology_(psychology)> psychology.
>> As research into decision-making behavior becomes increasingly
>> computational, it has also incorporated new approaches from theoretical
>> biology <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theoretical_biology>, computer
>> science <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_science>, and mathematics<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics>.
>> Neuroeconomics studies decision making, by using a combination of tools
>> from these fields so as to avoid the shortcomings that arise from a
>> single-perspective approach. In mainstream economics<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_economics>
>> , expected utility<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expected_utility_hypothesis> (EU),
>> and the concept of rational agents<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_agents>,
>> are still being used. Many economic behaviors are not fully explained by
>> these models, such as heuristics<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristics>
>>  and framing <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_(social_sciences)>.[2]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroeconomics#cite_note-annualreviews.org-2>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/p2p-foundation/attachments/20130927/7392852a/attachment-0001.htm