[P2P-F] Tadit's critiques on local currency reformers

[ideasinc at ee.net]

Sounds like a plan. The only part that make me uncomfortable is that the  
whole point of drafting a CC/CX system under the MMT/FF economics is that  
it would only be a variety of "pop" economics relative to its application,  
not relative to the economics involved. I refuse to rely on comforting  
buzz words to persuade people, though the values of "community," freedom  
 from debt, and the like are all integrated into the system. It is fully  
integrated with the lessons of monetary history and practice. It is  
intended to be a learning environment rather than fashion statement. oops  
that was probably "harsh," but true. Yes, it is perhaps a difficult set of  
concepts relative to what is familiar, but it is about economic literacy  
not perpetuating economic illiteracy.  Tadit




On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:29:47 -0400, Michel Bauwens  
<michel at p2pfoundation.net> wrote:

> here is the series of three we could publish as a series of challenges to
> established 'pop economics':