[P2P-F] Spirituality and the internet

[Michel Bauwens]

many thanks Jeff, I'm aware of her work but have never read it thoroughly,

Michel

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:15 AM, <teleboiski at gmail.com> wrote:

> ** Friends,
>
> The phrase "Spirituality and the internet" makes me think of a book
> entitled Earthdance by Elizabeth Sahtouris. She is an evolutionary biologist
> and her book is an excellent rendition of our planet's evolution.
>
> Her explanation of humanity begins in Ch 11 entitled "The Big Brain
> Experiment". By Ch 20 she talks about human sustainability in terms of
> adapting a living systems approach for human organizations where the
> Internet becomes our central nervous system and collective consciousness.
>
> It is a really great read plus the entire book is available online. I
> included a link to Ch 20 - "Sustainable Society" for your perusal.
>
> http://www.ratical.com/LifeWeb/Erthdnce/chapter20.html
>
> -Jeff Sterling
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Poor Richard <poor.ricardo at gmail.com>
> *Sender: * building-a-distributed-decentralized-internet at googlegroups.com
> *Date: *Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
> *To: *<building-a-distributed-decentralized-internet at googlegroups.com>
> *ReplyTo: * building-a-distributed-decentralized-internet at googlegroups.com
> *Cc: *p2p-foundation<p2p-foundation at lists.ourproject.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Spirituality and the internet
>
> I would join Michel in taking strong exception to the Pinker quote, despite
> owing much to Pinker's general body of work; but Dawkins is slammed without
> being quoted so I can't comment on that. I share Chris Knight's concerns,
> but find this quote to be too absolute and categorical with respect to ALL
> Evolutionary psychologists. I will stipulate that EvoPsych is a new field
> and can be *expected* to make many of the same mistakes as early
> psychology, social science, etc. I cannot paint  the whole field with the
> same brush, even though it is perhaps the least reputable and credible of
> any of the new fields attempting to assimilate cognitive neuroscience,
> genetics, and evolution into its portfolio.
>
> I would not characterize my own position as "fundamentalist" in any
> respect. My view is largely integral. While the cautionary sentiment
> expressed is entirely appropriate, healthy, and organic (the dangers of
> scientism are ever-present) I don't feel they pertain to my own views or
> remarks. If  any of my own comments seem to express fundamentalist or overly
> extreme positions, please quote them so I can consider revisions.
>
> PR
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
>


-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110912/b39b615a/attachment.htm