[P2P-F] Michael Hudson video *****

Thu Oct 13 19:40:17 CEST 2011

you are right that the general assumption is for 'public' to be centralized
(unless you mean they also include my qualifications?), but I think we can
challenge that assumption, and consider the 'public' to be quite diverse in
its possible formats,

Michel

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:44 AM, jmp <m.pedersen at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/10/11 19:54, Michel Bauwens wrote:
> > Martin, is a public utility necessarily centralized (or undemocratic ), I
> > don't think so; of course, even if it were, we should not automatically
> > fetishize distributed structures ... it's a question of balance or
> > 'subsidiarity' ...
>
> For sure, but the term "public" normally means that, no?
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>

-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111014/0ef23c81/attachment.htm 