[P2P-F] If the ?Tea Party Join Together, We Can End the Malignant Partnership Between Big Government | ZeroHedge

Natalie Golovin 10natalie at cox.net
Sat Nov 26 01:02:04 CET 2011


Agreed-and you can’t be replying to me. I support Ron Paul. I was answering a post that said people shouldn’t cooperate with others if they had “incorrect” positions & I disagreed with that. 

From: Devin Balkind 
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 12:35 PM
To: P2P Foundation mailing list 
Subject: Re: [P2P-F] If the ?Tea Party Join Together, We Can End the Malignant Partnership Between Big Government | ZeroHedge

This is such an old paradigm conversation.

First of all - yes I've seen anti-semetic signs at OWS, and next to them there's usually soemone with a sign that says "we don't support this person."  

Second, the fact that so many folks won't collaborate with each other because they have different political beliefs is why we're in this mess.  It's old paradigm thinking and it's preventing a lot of much needed production from taking place.

Third, the arguments that you mention against Ron Paul are straight out of the progressive media press releases.  Do some independent research.  Look into the effects of the war on drugs, US colonialism and the Federal Reserve and tell me that those policies aren't absolutely terrible and need to end.



On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Natalie Golovin <10natalie at cox.net> wrote:

  Regret using the term “lot’s of”-that IS something I’ve picked up on the net. But I personally have seen 3 on TV newscasts. The point is I fear where you’re going with this. It resembles political control in line with Southern segregation- at best encouraging people to disguise their preferences (promoting a surreptitious social atmosphere) and at worst, an Orwellian nightmare. Tyranny of the mob like Govt tyranny is still tyranny-and all in the name of a better society.

  From: Michel Bauwens 
  Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 7:13 AM
  To: P2P Foundation mailing list 
  Subject: Re: [P2P-F] If the ?Tea Party Join Together, We Can End the Malignant Partnership Between Big Government | ZeroHedge

  hi natalie,

  I know this is a popular meme with the right, and you even say, 'lots of', but, can you show me one picture with antisemitic slogans, I have seen hundreds of pictures, been to zuccoti, and not seen a single one ..


  On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Natalie Golovin <10natalie at cox.net> wrote:

    Unless someone breaks the law, or encourages, provokes, assists illegal acts, how can you justify not cooperating with them? First, in many cases-you may never know what’s “ in their hearts.’” In a Democratic-General Assembly kind of system-how can you exclude people because they don’t share your value system? You draw the line with personal relationships and voluntary acts like not working for a polluter, or voting for an anti-gay politician. There have been many Anti-Semitic signs at OWS protests. Do you not go because they are there? Kick them out? Less than full inclusion turns freedom of speech, or any other freedom into a mockery-just another kind of segregation.

    From: Michel Bauwens 
    Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 4:17 AM
    To: P2P Foundation mailing list 
    Subject: Re: [P2P-F] If the ?Tea Party Join Together, We Can End the Malignant Partnership Between Big Government | ZeroHedge




    On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Christian Siefkes <christian at siefkes.net> wrote:

      Michel Bauwens wrote:
      > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Christian Siefkes <christian at siefkes.net>wrote:

      >> > Would you work with the Ku Klux Klan if it could help foster your goals?
      >> > Where do you draw the line?
      >
      > good question, I would draw the line with explicitely 'anti-p2p' forces
      > such as racism, genderism, etc ..


      Yes, that sounds reasonable. Peer production requires treating others as
      your peers, as equals, and anybody with racist, homophobic, sexist,
      anti-semitic views won't be able to do that, hence their participation is
      likely do to more bad than good.

      Anti-abortion is about denying women's right over their own bodies (while,
      of course, men's rights over their bodies are never put in doubt), hence it
      is equally 'anti-p2p'.



    well, the last thing is a bit more problematic for me, I see this as an ethical opinion; for example, I have worked and communicated with catholic distributists, who are very egalitarian (support distributing proprety, catholic worker movement, live in collectives without property etc ..) but find abortion objectionable because of their egalitarianism .. of course, I disagree with this,  but I find it has little practical importance in the cooperation


      > a question for you: if you are working on a piece of free software, and you
      > discover your co-developer is KKK, would you stop working with her?
      >
      > these are by no means easy questions, FLOSS is full of libertarians, whose
      > values I object to ...


      I know. Eric Raymond's pro-gun standpoint and some of his possible
      more-or-less racists sayings haven't stopped me from quoting his insights
      about free software. 

    they are also majorly wrong in the bazaar/cathedral metaphor <g>; the cathedrals were very participatory and distributed efforts involving the whole population ..

     
      Some time ago I discovered that the author of a little
      piece of free software I'm using has shockingly right-wing views:
      http://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/enemies/ . That didn't stop me from using
      his software, nor from contributing a little patch back to him, of course.

      So I don't think people having personal views contrary to my own is a
      problem as long as it doesn't hinder cooperation in a project. But on the
      other hand I would think it very wrong to invite people with such
      standpoints precisely *because of* their standpoints -- which is what
      anybody who talks about "building an alliance with the Tea Party" is
      proposing to do.


    I agree, I would oppose any formal cooperation with tea party organisations, they are a very dangerous, fascism-inducing political force; but a few people call themselves that way and are pro-open source libertarians; they should disown the label instead of claiming that they are the true TP'ers and all the others are fake.


      And, of course, if (say) an openly racist person's participation in a
      project would cause black people to leave to product, or discourage them
      from joining it, since they could feel no longer welcome, then it would be
      the racist who would have to leave so as to correct the situation. I hope we
      agree on that?


    yes

     


      > what do you think of nader's alliance with ron paul, around the 3
      > priorities of ending the war, ending the war on drugs and 3 ??


      "and 3"? Ending wars, and ending the war on drugs are fine goals, and it
      seems to me that Ron Paul is by far not the worst of the Tea Party--near
      candidates currently running. Nevertheless I suppose that such alliances
      will ultimately do more bad than good, since they will increase acceptance
      for causes that are anti-emancipatory and 'anti-p2p'.



    ron paul also has quite terrible positions on civil rights and the like; I'm not sure if nader is correct is doing such an alliance, though I respect Nader a lot; I think ows has a better position, by eschewing formal political alliances altogether, and seeking broad commonality on a few key goals 

    at least for the time being ... if time, circumstances and maturation require much more radical steps, even such commonality may become strained

    Michel




      Best regards
             Christian

      --
      |------- Dr. Christian Siefkes ------- christian at siefkes.net -------
      | Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/ | Blog: http://www.keimform.de/
      |    Peer Production Everywhere:       http://peerconomy.org/wiki/
      |---------------------------------- OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 --

      It is only the identification of a Them that makes it possible for us to
      live with the epidemic of Aids in Africa or the death of thousands of
      children each day from curable diseases. The existence of capitalism is
      conceivable only on the basis of the dulling of our feelings ... that
      enables us to erect private morality into a wall to keep out the pain of
      the world.... Communism is the movement of intensity against the dulling of
      feeling that makes the horrors of capitalism possible.
             -- John Holloway, Change the World Without Taking Power


      _______________________________________________
      P2P Foundation - Mailing list
      http://www.p2pfoundation.net
      https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation





    -- 
    P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 

    Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation 

    Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    P2P Foundation - Mailing list
    http://www.p2pfoundation.net
    https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation


    _______________________________________________
    P2P Foundation - Mailing list
    http://www.p2pfoundation.net
    https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation





  -- 
  P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 

  Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation 

  Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  _______________________________________________
  P2P Foundation - Mailing list
  http://www.p2pfoundation.net
  https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation


  _______________________________________________
  P2P Foundation - Mailing list
  http://www.p2pfoundation.net
  https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation





-- 
Devin Balkind
Director, Sarapis Foundation 
devin at sarapisfoundation.org
@devinbalkind




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
P2P Foundation - Mailing list
http://www.p2pfoundation.net
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20111125/f9dcd168/attachment.htm 


More information about the P2P-Foundation mailing list