[P2P-F] 3d printing in economist

Wed Feb 16 11:19:48 CET 2011

Hi Michel,
I mentioned this to my youngest son who has some experience of this 
technology. He responded:

'One of the interesting developments is a 3d printer that can make all 
its own parts, i.e. you can use one to make another: 
http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page (all the designs are open source, so 
the idea is that people make one, improve the design, and make one for 
someone else).

Some of the printers can use recycled plastic, you grate up a few old 
plastic bottles and feed them into a hopper.

The coming battles over 'intellectual property' are going to make to 
current ones about movies and music seem minor.  I can already take a 
few photos of an object, model it accurately in a computer, get it 
prototyped and have a good copy without ever touching the original.'

Denis

On 15/02/2011 12:00, Michel Bauwens wrote:
> From: Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org <mailto:eugen at leitl.org>>
> Date: Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:23 AM
> Subject: [tt] Three-dimensional printing from digital designs will 
> transform
> manufacturing and allow more people to start making things
> To: tt at postbiota.org <mailto:tt at postbiota.org>
>
>
>
> http://www.economist.com/node/18114221?story_id=18114221&CFID=162367227&CFTOKEN=74435751 
> <http://www.economist.com/node/18114221?story_id=18114221&CFID=162367227&CFTOKEN=74435751>
>
> The printed world
>
> Three-dimensional printing from digital designs will transform 
> manufacturing
> and allow more people to start making things 3D printing
>
> Feb 10th 2011 | FILTON | from PRINT EDITION
>
> FILTON, just outside Bristol, is where Britain’s fleet of Concorde
> supersonic
> airliners was built. In a building near a wind tunnel on the same 
> sprawling
> site, something even more remarkable is being created. Little by little a
> machine is “printing” a complex titanium landing-gear bracket, about the
> size
> of a shoe, which normally would have to be laboriously hewn from a solid
> block of metal. Brackets are only the beginning. The researchers at Filton
> have a much bigger ambition: to print the entire wing of an airliner.
>
> Far-fetched as this may seem, many other people are using 
> three-dimensional
> printing technology to create similarly remarkable things. These include
> medical implants, jewellery, football boots designed for individual feet,
> lampshades, racing-car parts, solid-state batteries and customised mobile
> phones. Some are even making mechanical devices. At the Massachusetts
> Institute of Technology (MIT), Peter Schmitt, a PhD student, has been
> printing something that resembles the workings of a grandfather clock. It
> took him a few attempts to get right, but eventually he removed the 
> plastic
> clock from a 3D printer, hung it on the wall and pulled down the
> counterweight. It started ticking.
>
> Engineers and designers have been using 3D printers for more than a 
> decade,
> but mostly to make prototypes quickly and cheaply before they embark 
> on the
> expensive business of tooling up a factory to produce the real thing. 
> As 3D
> printers have become more capable and able to work with a broader range of
> materials, including production-grade plastics and metals, the 
> machines are
> increasingly being used to make final products too. More than 20% of the
> output of 3D printers is now final products rather than prototypes,
> according
> to Terry Wohlers, who runs a research firm specialising in the field. He
> predicts that this will rise to 50% by 2020. Related topics
>
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology
>
> Using 3D printers as production tools has become known in industry as
> “additive” manufacturing (as opposed to the old, “subtractive” business of
> cutting, drilling and bashing metal). The additive process requires 
> less raw
> material and, because software drives 3D printers, each item can be made
> differently without costly retooling. The printers can also produce
> ready-made objects that require less assembly and things that traditional
> methods would struggle with—such as the glove pictured above, made by 
> Within
> Technologies, a London company. It can be printed in nylon, stainless 
> steel
> or titanium.
>
> Click to manufacture
>
> The printing of parts and products has the potential to transform
> manufacturing because it lowers the costs and risks. No longer does a
> producer have to make thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of items to
> recover his fixed costs. In a world where economies of scale do not matter
> any more, mass-manufacturing identical items may not be necessary or
> appropriate, especially as 3D printing allows for a great deal of
> customisation. Indeed, in the future some see consumers downloading 
> products
> as they do digital music and printing them out at home, or at a local 3D
> production centre, having tweaked the designs to their own tastes. That is
> probably a faraway dream. Nevertheless, a new industrial revolution may be
> on
> the way.
>
> Printing in 3D may seem bizarre. In fact it is similar to clicking on the
> print button on a computer screen and sending a digital file, say a 
> letter,
> to an inkjet printer. The difference is that the “ink” in a 3D printer 
> is a
> material which is deposited in successive, thin layers until a solid 
> object
> emerges.
>
> The layers are defined by software that takes a series of digital slices
> through a computer-aided design. Descriptions of the slices are then 
> sent to
> the 3D printer to construct the respective layers. They are then put
> together
> in a number of ways. Powder can be spread onto a tray and then 
> solidified in
> the required pattern with a squirt of a liquid binder or by sintering it
> with
> a laser or an electron beam. Some machines deposit filaments of molten
> plastic. However it is achieved, after each layer is complete the 
> build tray
> is lowered by a fraction of a millimetre and the next layer is added. And
> when you’re happy, click print
>
> The researchers at Filton began using 3D printers to produce prototype 
> parts
> for wind-tunnel testing. The group is part of EADS Innovation Works, the
> research arm of EADS, a European defence and aerospace group best 
> known for
> building Airbuses. Prototype parts tend to be very expensive to make as
> one-offs by conventional means. Because their 3D printers could do the job
> more efficiently, the researchers’ thoughts turned to manufacturing
> components directly.
>
> Aircraft-makers have already replaced a lot of the metal in the 
> structure of
> planes with lightweight carbon-fibre composites. But even a small airliner
> still contains several tonnes of costly aerospace-grade titanium. These
> parts
> have usually been machined from solid billets, which can result in 90% of
> the
> material being cut away. This swarf is no longer of any use for making
> aircraft.
>
> To make the same part with additive manufacturing, EADS starts with a
> titanium powder. The firm’s 3D printers spread a layer about 20-30 microns
> (0.02-0.03mm) thick onto a tray where it is fused by lasers or an electron
> beam. Any surplus powder can be reused. Some objects may need a little
> machining to finish, but they still require only 10% of the raw material
> that
> would otherwise be needed. Moreover, the process uses less energy than a
> conventional factory. It is sometimes faster, too.
>
> There are other important benefits. Most metal and plastic parts are
> designed
> to be manufactured, which means they can be clunky and contain material
> surplus to the part’s function but necessary for making it. This is 
> not true
> of 3D printing. “You only put material where you need to have material,”
> says
> Andy Hawkins, lead engineer on the EADS project. The parts his team is
> making
> are more svelte, even elegant. This is because without manufacturing
> constraints they can be better optimised for their purpose. Compared 
> with a
> machined part, the printed one is some 60% lighter but still as sturdy.
>
> Form follows function
>
> Lightness is critical in making aircraft. A reduction of 1kg in the weight
> of
> an airliner will save around $3,000-worth of fuel a year and by the same
> token cut carbon-dioxide emissions. Additive manufacturing could thus help
> build greener aircraft—especially if all the 1,000 or so titanium parts in
> an
> airliner can be printed. Although the size of printable parts is 
> limited for
> now by the size of 3D printers, the EADS group believes that bigger 
> systems
> are possible, including one that could fit on the 35-metre-long gantry 
> used
> to build composite airliner wings. This would allow titanium components to
> be
> printed directly onto the structure of the wing.
>
> Many believe that the enhanced performance of additively manufactured 
> items
> will be the most important factor in driving the technology forward. It
> certainly is for MIT’s Mr Schmitt, whose interest lies in “original
> machines”. These are devices not constructed from a collection of
> prefabricated parts, but created in a form that flows from the 
> intention of
> the design. If that sounds a bit arty, it is: Mr Schmitt is a former art
> student from Germany who used to cadge time on factory lathes and milling
> machines to make mechanised sculptures. He is now working on novel servo
> mechanisms, the basic building blocks for robots. Custom-made servos cost
> many times the price of off-the-shelf ones. Mr Schmitt says it should be
> possible for a robot builder to specify what a servo needs to do, rather
> than
> how it needs to be made, and send that information to a 3D printer, 
> and for
> the machine’s software to know how to produce it at a low cost. “This 
> makes
> manufacturing more accessible,” says Mr Schmitt.
>
> The idea of the 3D printer determining the form of the items it produces
> intrigues Neri Oxman, an architect and designer who heads a research group
> examining new ways to make things at MIT’s Media Lab. She is building a
> printer to explore how new designs could be produced. Dr Oxman 
> believes the
> design and construction of objects could be transformed using principles
> inspired by nature, resulting in shapes that are impossible to build 
> without
> additive manufacturing. She has made items from sculpture to body 
> armour and
> is even looking at buildings, erected with computer-guided nozzles that
> deposit successive layers of concrete.
>
> Some 3D systems allow the properties and internal structure of the 
> material
> being printed to be varied. This year, for instance, Within Technologies
> expects to begin offering titanium medical implants with features that
> resemble bone. The company’s femur implant is dense where stiffness and
> strength is required, but it also has strong lattice structures which 
> would
> encourage the growth of bone onto the implant. Such implants are more 
> likely
> to stay put than conventional ones.
>
> Working at such a fine level of internal detail allows the stiffness and
> flexibility of an object to be determined at any point, says Siavash
> Mahdavi,
> the chief executive of Within Technologies. Dr Mahdavi is working on other
> lattice structures, including aerodynamic body parts for racing cars and
> special insoles for a firm that hopes to make the world’s most comfortable
> stiletto-heeled shoes.
>
> Digital Forming, a related company (where Dr Mahdavi is chief technology
> officer), uses 3D design software to help consumers customise 
> mass-produced
> products. For example, it is offering a service to mobile-phone 
> companies in
> which subscribers can go online to change the shape, colour and other
> features of the case of their new phone. The software keeps the user 
> within
> the bounds of the achievable. Once the design is submitted the casing is
> printed. Lisa Harouni, the company’s managing director, says the process
> could be applied to almost any consumer product, from jewellery to
> furniture.
> “I don’t have any doubt that this technology will change the way we
> manufacture things,” she says.
>
> Other services allow individuals to upload their own designs and have them
> printed. Shapeways, a New York-based firm spun out of Philips, a Dutch
> electronics company, last year, offers personalised 3D production, or 
> “mass
> customisation”, as Peter Weijmarshausen, its chief executive, 
> describes it.
> Shapeways prints more than 10,000 unique products every month from 
> materials
> that range from stainless steel to glass, plastics and sandstone. 
> Customers
> include individuals and shopkeepers, many ordering jewellery, gifts and
> gadgets to sell in their stores.
>
> EOS, a German supplier of laser-sintering 3D printers, says they are 
> already
> being used to make plastic and metal production parts by carmakers,
> aerospace
> firms and consumer-products companies. And by dentists: up to 450 dental
> crowns, each tailored for an individual patient, can be manufactured 
> in one
> go in a day by a single machine, says EOS. Some craft producers of crowns
> would do well to manage a dozen a day. As an engineering exercise, EOS 
> also
> printed the parts for a violin using a high-performance industrial 
> polymer,
> had it assembled by a professional violin-maker and played by a concert
> violinist.
>
> Both EOS and Stratasys, a company based in Minneapolis which makes 3D
> printers that employ plastic-deposition technology, use their own machines
> to
> print parts that are, in turn, used to build more printers. Stratasys is
> even
> trying to print a car, or at least the body of one, for Kor Ecologic, a
> company in Winnipeg, whose boss, Jim Kor, is developing an electric-hybrid
> vehicle called Urbee. Jim Kor’s printed the model. Next, the car
>
> Making low-volume, high-value and customised components is all very well,
> but
> could additive manufacturing really compete with mass-production 
> techniques
> that have been honed for over a century? Established techniques are 
> unlikely
> to be swept away, but it is already clear that the factories of the future
> will have 3D printers working alongside milling machines, presses, 
> foundries
> and plastic injection-moulding equipment, and taking on an increasing 
> amount
> of the work done by those machines.
>
> Morris Technologies, based in Cincinnati, was one of the first 
> companies to
> invest heavily in additive manufacturing for the engineering and 
> production
> services it offers to companies. Its first intention was to make 
> prototypes
> quickly, but by 2007 the company says it realised “a new industry was 
> being
> born” and so it set up another firm, Rapid Quality Manufacturing, to
> concentrate on the additive manufacturing of higher volumes of production
> parts. It says many small and medium-sized components can be turned from
> computer designs into production-quality metal parts in hours or days,
> against days or weeks using traditional processes. And the printers can
> build
> unattended, 24 hours a day.
>
> Neil Hopkinson has no doubts that 3D printing will compete with mass
> manufacturing in many areas. His team at Loughborough University has
> invented
> a high-speed sintering system. It uses inkjet print-heads to deposit
> infra-red-absorbing ink on layers of polymer powder which are fused into
> solid shapes with infra-red heating. Among other projects, the group is
> examining the potential for making plastic buckles for Burton 
> Snowboards, a
> leading American producer of winter-sports equipment. Such items are
> typically produced by plastic injection-moulding. Dr Hopkinson says his
> process can make them for ten pence (16 cents) each, which is highly
> competitive with injection-moulding. Moreover, the designs could easily be
> changed without Burton incurring high retooling costs.
>
> Predicting how quickly additive manufacturing will be taken up by industry
> is
> difficult, adds Dr Hopkinson. That is not necessarily because of the
> conservative nature of manufacturers, but rather because some 
> processes have
> already moved surprisingly fast. Only a few years ago making decorative
> lampshades with 3D printers seemed to be a highly unlikely business, 
> but it
> has become an industry with many competing firms and sales volumes in the
> thousands.
>
> Dr Hopkinson thinks Loughborough’s process is already competitive with
> injection-moulding at production runs of around 1,000 items. With further
> development he expects that within five years it would be competitive in
> runs
> of tens if not hundreds of thousands. Once 3D printing machines are 
> able to
> crank out products in such numbers, then more manufacturers will look to
> adopt the technology.
>
> Will Sillar of Legerwood, a British firm of consultants, expects to 
> see the
> emergence of what he calls the “digital production plant”: firms will no
> longer need so much capital tied up in tooling costs, work-in-progress and
> raw materials, he says. Moreover, the time to take a digital design from
> concept to production will drop, he believes, by as much as 50-80%. The
> ability to overcome production constraints and make new things will 
> combine
> with improvements to the technology and greater mechanisation to make 3D
> printing more mainstream.
>
> -- 
> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>
> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss: 
> http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation
>
> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; 
> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>
> Commons Strategies Group, http://www.commonsstrategies.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> P2P Foundation - Mailing list
> http://www.p2pfoundation.net
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

-- 
The Mind Gymnasium FREE ebook Library <http://www.mind-gymnasium.com/>
A unique digital resource for Personal and Professional development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/p2p-foundation/attachments/20110216/83eb9019/attachment.htm 