[Musix-Help] FW: reiserfs o ext3

Jue Feb 9 01:56:24 CET 2006

Creo que acá salió el tema de qué sistema de archivos era el mejor 
(reiserfs), pego algo que leí en aGNUla:

Re: [a-users] File Systems?
De: 
Dominique Michel <dominique.michel en citycable.ch>
  Para: 
users en lists.agnula.org
  Fecha: 
22/01/06 21:43

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:54:53 +0000
tim hall <tech en glastonburymusic.org.uk> wrote:

> On Saturday 21 January 2006 23:53, Dominique Michel was like:
> > Reiser have the best overall performance figure, but if you are
> > using big files and large data blocks XFS will be superior.
> > Reiserfs is the default on Demudi.
> 
> Surely you mean ext3?

You may be right, because I have changed it. I use ext2.

The advantage of reiser and xfs over ext3 is at reiser and xfs have
a journal that's built into the data stream somehow and not a separate
file. I have learn that only recently and I have choose ext2 because at
I get big trouble onetime with an ext3 partition where the journal was
crashed. 

Basiquelly I see ext3 as an ext2 filesystem with a journal, so
the performances will not be better. The article on
http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/Arcana.html#Mark%20Knecht's%20filesystem%20tests
semm to say the same thing with other word. He get worst result with
ext3 as with ext2. It is the case because the ext3 fs must stop to write
the datas when it write the journal.

So I will try to change my system partition to reiser or xfs when I get
some time.

-- 
Marcos Guglielmetti  
Coordinador del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux 
(www.musix.org.ar) 
Mirrors: (www.musix.distrux.net) (www.pc-musica.com.ar/musix) 
(www.k-maleon.com/musix)

___________________________________________________________ 
1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam 
Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo 
http://correo.yahoo.com.ar 