[JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production

Sat Sep 9 10:38:25 CEST 2017

Hi Zack, all

You're right, just seemed a bit awkward to not respond at all, and I suppose deep down I like the idea of restricting commercial usage (though see that it is less relevant in the context of scientific research). So, I will amend asap, which may not be right away, but before the deadline.

cheers

Mathieu

________________________________
From: JoPP-Public <jopp-public-bounces at lists.ourproject.org> on behalf of Stefano Zacchiroli <zack at pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2017 17:14
To: jopp-public at lists.ourproject.org
Subject: Re: [JoPP-Public] Fw: Your journal application to DOAJ: Journal of Peer Production

On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 06:38:31AM +0000, Mathieu ONeil wrote:
> It seems Natacha is in favour of Angela's position... we need to
> resolve this in the next few days otherwise the deadline will pass.

We had already resolved it, reaching what it seemed to be rough
consensus on vetoing restrictive licenses like NC/ND. Going for a
"whoever post their opinion last on this list wins" approach doesn't
seem wise, especially considering the deadline.

Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . zack at upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o
Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director  . . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

_______________________________________________
JoPP-Public mailing list
JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20170909/84d34bee/attachment.html>