[JoPP-Public] [Denisa Kera] Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?

Fri May 6 18:33:05 CEST 2016

Hi,

As someone who has greatly benefitted from the Journal, I'd be happy to
help in any logistical stuff you need. Just let me know if I can help.

Cheers.

On 6 May 2016 at 07:27, maxigas <maxigas at anargeek.net> wrote:

> hi,
>
> Please find below our exchange with Denisa Kera on working towards
> including JoPP in the ERIH database.
>
> maxigas
>
> > From: Denisa Kera <denisa.kera at gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:11:48 +0000
> > Subject: Re: Journal of Peer Prudction on ERIH?
> > To: maxigas <maxigas at anargeek.net>
>
> > Going to the airport, but the base line is that when you apply for jobs,
> > tenure, evaluation etc you will run into a problem... ERIH would make
> > sense, yes send it to the rest to see what they think.
> > I like the people/networks the content, we neede to improve this, get the
> > missing data, give DOI to articles etc
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016, 05:07 maxigas <maxigas at anargeek.net> wrote:
>
> > > Denisa Kera <denisa.kera at gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Maxigas,
> > >
> > > Hi Denisa, nice to hear from you!
> > >
> > > > Can we prepare these three criteria about JPP so its accepted in ERIH
> > > > https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/
> > >
> > > Can I repost your message to the JoPP-public list?
> > >
> > > > I think it is becoming a good journal, especially in our community...
> > >
> > > I agree!  I am proud to say that we developed it into something like a
> > > veritable intellectual laboratory, at least from my perspective. :)
> > >
> > > > The main issues seems "
> > > >
> > > >   * ERIH PLUS requires that no more than two thirds of the authors
> > > > published in the journal are from the same institution."
> > > >
> > > > - do you have the data?
> > >
> > > No -- in fact I guess that the majority of issues don't include
> > > information on author's affiliation. :( Even worse, we are not doing
> > > well on the other criteria either:
> > >
> > > * All original articles should be accompanied by abstracts in English
> > > and/or another international language relevant for the field
> > >
> > > I am not even sure if there are abstracts published for papers, which
> is
> > > a pity because the editorial process of course already includes
> abstracts.
> > >
> > > * Information on author affiliations and addresses
> > >
> > > See above.
> > >
> > > * No more than two thirds of the authors published in the journal are
> > > from the same institution
> > >
> > > So as far as I see it, it would be quite a job to convert JoPP to
> > > conform these criteria.
> > >
> > > What are the benefits of inclusion?
> > >
> > > Is there somebody to work on this?
> > >
> > > Maybe we can include it on a roadmap?
>
> --
> maxigas, kiberpunk
> FA00 8129 13E9 2617 C614 0901 7879 63BC 287E D166
> http://relay70.metatron.ai/
>
> In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hub
> http://custodians.online
>
> Share this letter - read it in public - leave it in the printer. Share
> your writing - digitize a book - upload your files. Don't let our
> knowledge be crushed. Care for the libraries - care for the metadata -
> care for the backup. Water the ❀❀❀❀❀ - clean the volcanoes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> JoPP-Public mailing list
> JoPP-Public at lists.ourproject.org
> https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jopp-public
>

-- 

Giancarlo M. Sandoval

@revfutures <http://www.twitter.com/revfutures>

Revisionary Futures. <http://www.revisionaryfutures.com>
<http://twitter.com/sGiancarloLM>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ourproject.org/pipermail/jopp-public/attachments/20160506/3c5aeaf9/attachment.htm 